Counterintuitive but makes sense: wfh doesn’t encourage a “work from anywhere” world, rather it reinforces large cities bc long commute times become less of a disutility
04.08.2025 08:25 — 👍 15 🔁 6 💬 1 📌 0@p-hunermund.com.bsky.social
Professor of Technology and Economic Policy | Co-founder of causalscience.org | Associate Editor at Journal of Causal Inference | Executive Team at Academy of Management TIM Division
Counterintuitive but makes sense: wfh doesn’t encourage a “work from anywhere” world, rather it reinforces large cities bc long commute times become less of a disutility
04.08.2025 08:25 — 👍 15 🔁 6 💬 1 📌 0A reminder that the 70+ year-old research discipline of AI is much bigger than genAI, much bigger than just deep learning, much bigger than Big Tech. AI includes symbolic reasoning, multi-agent systems and statistical machine learning and is used for astrophysics, renewable energy and climate models
04.08.2025 07:24 — 👍 63 🔁 15 💬 3 📌 2I make a cross-over once in a while 😉
04.08.2025 07:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Meta information in the supplementary Word file 🙄
04.08.2025 06:16 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0And yes, it immediately came back. But luckily only because of some formatting issues. 😅
04.08.2025 05:06 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Submitted a paper today. Every time I have this TikTok in my head. youtube.com/shorts/6kllg...
03.08.2025 15:28 — 👍 14 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 1Twitter seems like an endless monologue from Tom Buchanan about the "rise of the Colored empires"
03.08.2025 13:18 — 👍 103 🔁 11 💬 5 📌 1Stephen Nunez @socio-steve.bsky.social • 13h The AK in AK-47 stands for "Assault Knife" Steve @rapidlydownhill.bsky.social • 3h No. The AK-47, or Avtomat Kalashnikova model of the year 1947. Designed by Mikhail Kalashnikov. Avtomat translates to Automatic (or contextually to Automatic Machine). Kalashnikova means it "belongs" or is "of" Kalashnikov, the designer. Stephen Nuñez @socio-steve.bsky.social • 2h No it's assault knife. Just like how the AR in AR-15 stands for assault rifle. Steve @rapidlydownhill.bsky.social • 2h Still unconvinced? Stephen Nuñez @socio-steve.bsky.social • 2h Look is assault rifle and assault knife. Does exactly what is says on the tin. You Internet weirdos make everything more complicated than it needs to be. Steve @rapidlydownhill.bsky.social • 2h So. No acceptance of facts? Fair enough. You can believe what you want. I might have expected more from an apparently well educated person. Expect others to learn but not be willing to do so yourself. Resorting to insults is another sign of your insecurity. Good day sir.
03.08.2025 13:04 — 👍 884 🔁 71 💬 41 📌 11Because historical counterfactuals are hard to pin down for most people, and the resulting epistemological uncertainty is frequently supplanted by prevailing culture war narratives.
03.08.2025 12:47 — 👍 10 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0What a fantastic accomplishment -- and what a fantastic story! www.quantamagazine.org/at-17-hannah...
03.08.2025 12:13 — 👍 292 🔁 88 💬 5 📌 61/ An 'army mafia' has developed within Russia's invasion force in Ukraine, operating with near-impunity to smuggle commodities back into Russia and strip seized industries to sell for personal profit. A Russian commentary highlights the difficulties of tackling it. ⬇️
03.08.2025 11:21 — 👍 243 🔁 53 💬 7 📌 4I'm skeptical whether economists will be able to lead the revolution to causal in industry. They are too deeply invested in their quasi-experimental methods and by now seem to be too narrow-minded to change.
03.08.2025 11:23 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0🗣️ @aligarciaherrero.bsky.social joins Théo Storella & @yuyunzhan.bsky.social for a podcast discussion on the evolving landscape for European companies operating in China and their shifting strategies amid rising economic uncertainty and geopolitical tension. #EconSky
🔗 Listen here: buff.ly/Z3aJAWB
That's a good point. It's exactly the problem of eliciting expert domain knowledge from diverse stakeholders ("no causes in, no causes out") that we're currently working on. Causal AI is more demanding in that regard than simply running XGBoost or using PyTorch out of the box.
03.08.2025 10:57 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Here: using DAGs to show how dangerous DML is www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi...
03.08.2025 10:23 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It'll fade. DML is just too convenient to sanctify your regression models using the big data/ML moniker with.
03.08.2025 10:21 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Why not gonna happen?
03.08.2025 10:19 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Dann können wir uns wenigstens weiter überlegen gegenüber den unwissenden Normies fühlen.
03.08.2025 10:18 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Good, that gives me confidence. Bayesian meta-analysis won't be the next big thing, though.
03.08.2025 09:39 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Me preparing for the next AI winter—from which #CausalAI will emerge as the next big thing
03.08.2025 09:37 — 👍 15 🔁 1 💬 4 📌 0Not following the discourse too much, but "Sydney Sweeney has good jeans" is a bad slogan, isn't it?
03.08.2025 06:15 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0That's why a new Bond will have such a hard time to revitalize the franchise. Britain has lost too much of its cool.
03.08.2025 06:11 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0to be clear, australian voters would not support this because one of our deep deficits as a nation is that we dont believe in the value of intellectual ambition in any way, this is not a case of albo being stupid (there are many of those but) we as a group are stupid
03.08.2025 03:24 — 👍 22 🔁 1 💬 3 📌 0It's not nice to compare Judea with Yoda
02.08.2025 20:20 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Dude.
02.08.2025 18:12 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Big thanks to Professors Katz, Abraham, Dynan, and Troske for this wise and quick response.
02.08.2025 16:53 — 👍 34 🔁 5 💬 1 📌 0Well played.
02.08.2025 17:57 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Would the Jedi or the Sith be more likely to develop Bayesian statistics?
02.08.2025 17:32 — 👍 30 🔁 3 💬 8 📌 1In Europe
02.08.2025 17:27 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Bluesky doesn't seem to be the right place to get an unbiased answer to that.
02.08.2025 17:25 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0