Tomas Hirst's Avatar

Tomas Hirst

@tomashirstecon.bsky.social

Strategy & Asset Allocation. Queasy metropolitan liberal. “Economist” - @t0nyyates

5,536 Followers  |  725 Following  |  5,926 Posts  |  Joined: 11.05.2023  |  2.2759

Latest posts by tomashirstecon.bsky.social on Bluesky

This is a cool paper on how direct lending interacts with private equity (and the underlying portfolio companies). knowledge.uchicago.edu/record/12380...

07.10.2025 12:58 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

The more I think about this the more I worry that the UK is lacking one of the growth narratives that might actually, you know, work…

06.10.2025 19:26 — 👍 9    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

*who almost certainly work in media

06.10.2025 23:45 — 👍 8    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Less energy use isn’t necessarily de-growth

06.10.2025 23:16 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

He’s just realised that, if there’s an afterlife, his odds ain’t great

06.10.2025 21:40 — 👍 9    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

LHR -> BOS (for anyone still keeping count)

06.10.2025 21:19 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Not sure how I feel about the long sleeves though

06.10.2025 20:03 — 👍 6    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

The Cameron project was that the state could pull back and the private sector would fill the gaps. There wasn’t really much outside of that conviction. And when it failed, the response was to keep plugging leaks rather than address the broader systemic issue causing the holes.

06.10.2025 19:57 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

We now have a choice about whether to go all in on “jack labour power up to 11 and see if we can wring out productivity gains” or a middle ground approach of encouraging business via incentives (at the marginal cost of households) while protecting labour rights. And there’s no party offering either!

06.10.2025 19:50 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Narratively, there was a period where labour had it a little too good vs capital so some rebalancing was inevitable. Then Cons overdid it and (big L)abour came back into power. They used brute force state spending to rebalance vs capital/labour frictions. And then Cam et al kneecapped that approach.

06.10.2025 19:47 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

That’s what they said about the mining communities. And what happened to those badgers?

06.10.2025 19:40 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Why do you want canine unemployment Alan?

06.10.2025 19:31 — 👍 5    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

The more I think about this the more I worry that the UK is lacking one of the growth narratives that might actually, you know, work…

06.10.2025 19:26 — 👍 9    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

Yeah, learning the binary wrong lesson from Sunak is a cardinal sin here - he couldn’t rescue the legacy and basically folded into a bad version of the alt-right model by the election. It was just a poor fit. People were tired of the Tories in government, and the party threw out the entire project.

06.10.2025 19:16 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

The most frustrating thing being that a pro-business, broadly socially laissez faire party would be (I think) really pressuring Labour right now. Path dependence is such a nasty constraint.

06.10.2025 19:00 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Fear of Reform will skew the result in the exact wrong direction for actually beating Reform. And at almost any point over the last two decades I would have chuckled - except for this one.

06.10.2025 18:43 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

We have firmly reached the stage of desperately wanting her to be better. Almost cheerleading for her to start actually doing the job.

06.10.2025 18:35 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Look at e.g. railway speculation, South American speculative bonds, the dot-com boom. This really isn’t that unusual.

06.10.2025 18:22 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

This isn’t a picture of Mel Stride and the shadow chancellor being misidentified on ConHome feels quite indicative of where the Tories are at.

06.10.2025 17:55 — 👍 242    🔁 73    💬 7    📌 8

Ok, so I think we need a rundown of Conservative economic theory and why the party cannot get its head around any coherent stance.

06.10.2025 15:18 — 👍 31    🔁 8    💬 1    📌 2

Oh to the party that promises all the above with absolutely no trade-offs

06.10.2025 17:00 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Mostly to their base - so think triple-lock etc

06.10.2025 16:57 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

The superpower is sort of…a seemingly limitless willingness to believe the hype. And I really mean that.

06.10.2025 16:57 — 👍 8    🔁 2    💬 1    📌 0

Yes I wish I had started with than point! Thank you for trudging all the way down thread to find it.

06.10.2025 16:52 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

Good thread here. One of the points made further down is that we really do need a centre right party with a coherent economic policy if we are going to generate the battle of ideas needed to improve economic performance in a world where the economic fundamentals aren’t generally favourable.

06.10.2025 16:50 — 👍 15    🔁 5    💬 3    📌 0

The bad thing is, trivially, this is an extremely large one-way bet.

But this is also an archetypical example of American exceptionalism - funnelling an enormous quantum of resource at a particular project such that you break through resource frictions quickly to push to development/testing stages.

06.10.2025 16:52 — 👍 5    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

(I actually think some parts of the libertarian contingent began to think of Brexit as the rapture in this regard - and now cling to it like the Lost Cause)

06.10.2025 16:21 — 👍 8    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Three stories

1) Oracle x OpenAI
2) NVDA investing in OpenAI
3) OpenAI’s agreement with AMD in exchange for warrants

All involve some form of weird financing, exchange of funds and more.

All because OpenAI has outgrown the private markets.

All bloody crazy

06.10.2025 16:05 — 👍 144    🔁 27    💬 8    📌 4

Thank you!

06.10.2025 16:18 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Thanks!

06.10.2025 16:18 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

@tomashirstecon is following 20 prominent accounts