Jeremy Bierbach's Avatar

Jeremy Bierbach

@basilok.bsky.social

Antifa lawyer practicing immigration and citizenship law in the Netherlands; researcher on EU citizenship HoyaBScUvALLBLLMPhD πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆmarried to https://bsky.app/profile/stefanmakesthings.bsky.social https://gram.social/basilok

846 Followers  |  616 Following  |  271 Posts  |  Joined: 05.09.2023  |  2.2444

Latest posts by basilok.bsky.social on Bluesky

Fascinating thing about the Dutch obsession with asylum is that the Netherlands is running a unique experiment with two groups: non-European refugees, who are cooped up in abysmal conditions, excluded from everything and blamed for social disruption, petty crime and inciting far-right hooliganism …

15.10.2025 08:51 β€” πŸ‘ 21    πŸ” 14    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Republicans Go All In on Anti-Trans Messaging More than half of GOP ads in Virginia are focused on trans issues. Officials plan to run similar attacks in North Carolina's Senate race.

More than half of Republican ads in Virginia are focused on trans issues. Officials say they plan to run similar attacks in North Carolina’s Senate race.

www.theassemblync.co...

#transgender #trans #LGBTQ #LGBTQIA

15.10.2025 09:38 β€” πŸ‘ 29    πŸ” 16    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 2
Preview
Voormalig UvA-docent Laurens Buijs betuigt spijt in de rechtbank. ‘Het klopt, het is allemaal uit mijn pen gekomen’ Online intimidatie: De lijst van collega’s, journalisten en artsen die het tussen 2024 en begin 2025 moesten ontgelden door de bedreigingen van Buijs is lang. Dinsdag stond de oud-docent terecht voor ...

Het is voor velen, ook voor Buijs zelf, intens verdrietig hoe dit gelopen is.

De politici en media die Buijs' geestesziekte voor "cultuuroorlog aan de UvA" aanzagen, het universiteitsbestuur dat er n zware onderzoekscommissie aan wijdde - hebben die nu iets geleerd?

www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2025/...

15.10.2025 08:12 β€” πŸ‘ 52    πŸ” 17    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
Studentenabonnement Volkskrant Een Volkskrant-abonnement afsluiten als Student? Voor Studenten is het Abonnement geheel Gratis zolang je Studeert.

Ben je of ken je een mbo-, hbo- of wo-student tussen de 16- en 25 jaar: let op: studenten krijgen een gratis abonnement op de Volkskrant of Trouw, Het Parool, AD, Brabants Dagblad, ED, Tubantia, BN DeStem, PZC, De Stentor, De Gelderlander. Spread the word!

abonnement.volkskrant.nl/studenten?pr...

14.10.2025 08:11 β€” πŸ‘ 71    πŸ” 43    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 4

They don’t see themselves as enforcing immigration laws. They see themselves as deciding who gets to be American

14.10.2025 04:14 β€” πŸ‘ 289    πŸ” 88    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 1
Post image Post image

Ze staat op plek 24 van de kieslijst van @groenlinks-pvda.bsky.social en zat gisteren naast @franstimmermans.groenlinkspvda.nl toen hij in een Amsterdams cafΓ© werd bedreigd door een groepje extreemrechtse mannen. Dit schreef @fatihyaabdi.bsky.social op Instagram over die gebeurtenis:

13.10.2025 19:52 β€” πŸ‘ 231    πŸ” 100    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 7

Deze beeldtaal is buitengewoon schadelijk. Ze wekt de indruk dat Nederland van alle kanten wordt bestookt door migranten, versterkt de obsessie met migratie als hΓ©t probleem van onze tijd en legitimeert daarmee de zogenaamde β€˜anti-immigratieprotesten’.

12.10.2025 20:10 β€” πŸ‘ 454    πŸ” 111    πŸ’¬ 34    πŸ“Œ 8
Preview
"Dutch nationality plan is a desperate act of political bravado" - DutchNews.nl In any democratic society, immigration law is an outlier. Normally, the people directly affected by laws should have a say in how they are made. But immigration and naturalisation laws are different, ...

I got to vent my opinion in DutchNews on the caretaker Dutch cabinet’s nationality law proposal. I could have devoted just as many words to the appalling lack of quality English-language news coverage of Dutch politics and of Dutch-language news coverage of proposals affecting ordinary migrants.

09.10.2025 07:17 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
β€˜Ik ben geen populist’, zegt VVD-leider Dilan YesilgΓΆz Dilan YesilgΓΆz | lijsttrekker VVD: Ze staat onder zware druk, door dalende peilingen en openlijke kritiek vanuit haar eigen partij. Toch houdt Dilan YesilgΓΆz vast aan haar inhoudelijke koers, hoewel z...

Het zou zo maar kunnen dat dit interview van @lamyae.bsky.social en Pim van den Dool het laatste zetje geeft aan een enorme verkiezingsnederlaag van de @vvdonline.bsky.social.
www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2025/...

08.10.2025 18:24 β€” πŸ‘ 44    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 4

We komen echt nooit meer uit de wurggreep waar NLse media sinds de aanslag op Fortuyn in zitten, om vooral niet links over te komen en niet beschuldigd te worden van het β€œdemoniseren” van rechts.
Deze 23-jarige overcompensatie richting zelfs de kleinste rechtse partijen gaat echt nooit meer weg.

07.10.2025 20:32 β€” πŸ‘ 276    πŸ” 75    πŸ’¬ 14    πŸ“Œ 0

Plans to further reduce EU standards for expulsion of non-EU citizens, via @statewatch.bsky.social

06.10.2025 16:43 β€” πŸ‘ 32    πŸ” 20    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 3

Adrie is een van de beste dokters die ik ooit heb gehadβ€”ik baalde ervan toen ik niet meer in het centrum van Amsterdam woonde en naar een nieuwe huisarts moest. In bepaalde opzichten was hij ook inspirerend voor mijn praktijk als advocaat, de manier waarop hij onverbloemd en goudeerlijk advies gaf ❀️

06.10.2025 10:10 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
We slaapwandelen naar het eind van de democratie zoals we die kennen

We slaapwandelen naar het eind van de democratie zoals we die kennen

04.10.2025 10:06 β€” πŸ‘ 99    πŸ” 40    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 5

β€˜Dat de VVD nog altijd geen afstand neemt van Wilders’ asielplannen, evident extreem-rechts geweld niet subiet veroordeelt, krankzinnige Trump-moties over β€˜antifa’ steunt en nu uitgeprocedeerde asielzoekers in Oeganda wil lozen, heeft ieder laatste restje vertrouwen ondermijnd.’

06.10.2025 08:09 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

you! are! a! lawyer!

I fear that the legal community will act like Trump admin's lawyers are normal lawyers--like they'll get nice firm jobs and their law schools will invite them to talk to students, etc--but the lawyers facilitating Trump's lawlessness should be professionally and socially shamed

06.10.2025 03:30 β€” πŸ‘ 2013    πŸ” 412    πŸ’¬ 52    πŸ“Œ 9
Video thumbnail

This is the home of Diane Goodstein, a federal judge who ruled against Trump last month.

Members of her family were still inside, but survived by jumping out windows.

Just yesterday Stephen Miller claimed left wing judges were terrorists & state power was needed to stop them.

06.10.2025 03:15 β€” πŸ‘ 481    πŸ” 290    πŸ’¬ 27    πŸ“Œ 43

Yarvin convinced a bunch of credulous tech billionaires that they needed to back an extreme, dumb, & wildly unpopular politics to β€œsave western civilization.” We’re now getting that politics on steroids, and now he’s all β€œoh no, these policies are unpopular, must flee the country to save ourselves.”

05.10.2025 18:24 β€” πŸ‘ 795    πŸ” 246    πŸ’¬ 47    πŸ“Œ 16
Video thumbnail

NEW: Extraordinary scenes in Amsterdam this afternoon (Sunday, Oct 5).

An estimated 250,000 bring the city to a standstill; people all wearing red to show solidarity with Palestine πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ

(πŸŽ₯ Ahmed Zantac)

05.10.2025 15:07 β€” πŸ‘ 11356    πŸ” 4312    πŸ’¬ 251    πŸ“Œ 332

It is morally wrong to want a computer to be sentient. If you owned a sentient thing, you would be a slaver. If you want sentient computers to exist, you just want to create a new kind of slavery. The ethics are as simple as that. Sorry if this offends

05.10.2025 12:46 β€” πŸ‘ 4039    πŸ” 938    πŸ’¬ 76    πŸ“Œ 90

It was huge!

05.10.2025 14:33 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

And yes these means nuking the filibuster.

10 min in: πŸ’£ filibuster
12 in: expand Court
15 in: confirm slate of Justices w/o hearings
20 in: expand House, John Lewis Act
22 in: DC statehood
25 in: strip Trump hires of civil service protections.
30 in: break up DHS

03.10.2025 02:21 β€” πŸ‘ 108    πŸ” 29    πŸ’¬ 10    πŸ“Œ 2
The Government now asks us to reverse the preliminary
injunctions in these cases. We see no reason to do so. The
Government is right that the Framers of the Citizenship Clause
sought to remove the stain of Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 119
How.) 393 (1857), which shamefully denied United States
citizenship to "descendants of Africans who were imported into
this country, and sold as slaves," even when the descendants were born here. Id. at 403. But the Framers chose to accomplish that
just purpose in broad terms, as both the supreme Court in United
States . Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), and Congress in
passing Β§ 1401(a) have recognized. The Government is therefore
wrong to argue that the plaintiffs are not likely to succeed in
showing that the children that the EO covers are citizens of this
country at birth, just as the Government is wrong to argue that
various limits on our remedial power independently require us to
reverse the preliminary injunctions.?

The Government now asks us to reverse the preliminary injunctions in these cases. We see no reason to do so. The Government is right that the Framers of the Citizenship Clause sought to remove the stain of Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 119 How.) 393 (1857), which shamefully denied United States citizenship to "descendants of Africans who were imported into this country, and sold as slaves," even when the descendants were born here. Id. at 403. But the Framers chose to accomplish that just purpose in broad terms, as both the supreme Court in United States . Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), and Congress in passing Β§ 1401(a) have recognized. The Government is therefore wrong to argue that the plaintiffs are not likely to succeed in showing that the children that the EO covers are citizens of this country at birth, just as the Government is wrong to argue that various limits on our remedial power independently require us to reverse the preliminary injunctions.?

The analysis that follows is necessarily lengthy, as we
must address the parties' numerous arguments in each of the cases
involved. But the length of our analysis should not be mistaken
for a sign that the fundamental question that these cases raise
about the scope of birthright citizenship is a difficult one.
β€’It
is not, which may explain why it has been more than a century since a branch of our government has made as concerted an effort as the
Executive Branch now makes to deny Americans their birthright.

The analysis that follows is necessarily lengthy, as we must address the parties' numerous arguments in each of the cases involved. But the length of our analysis should not be mistaken for a sign that the fundamental question that these cases raise about the scope of birthright citizenship is a difficult one. β€’It is not, which may explain why it has been more than a century since a branch of our government has made as concerted an effort as the Executive Branch now makes to deny Americans their birthright.

Thus, it is no surprise that, when presented with even
more uncontroverted evidence by the State-Plaintiffs about the
need for an injunction of the current breadth, the District Court
again found that a narrower injunction would leave unremedied
"administrative and financial harms." We therefore decline to
conclude that the District Court has abused its discretion in
fashioning relief. See Philip Morris, Inc. v. Harshbarger, 159
F. 3d 670, 680 (1st Cir. 1998) (explaining that "[als a general
rule, a disappointed litigant cannot surface an objection to a preliminary injunction for the first time in an appellate venue"
because doing so deprives the district court of the opportunity to
"consider [the objection] and correct the injunction if necessary,
without the need for appeal" (quoting Zenon, 711 F.2d at 478)).

Thus, it is no surprise that, when presented with even more uncontroverted evidence by the State-Plaintiffs about the need for an injunction of the current breadth, the District Court again found that a narrower injunction would leave unremedied "administrative and financial harms." We therefore decline to conclude that the District Court has abused its discretion in fashioning relief. See Philip Morris, Inc. v. Harshbarger, 159 F. 3d 670, 680 (1st Cir. 1998) (explaining that "[als a general rule, a disappointed litigant cannot surface an objection to a preliminary injunction for the first time in an appellate venue" because doing so deprives the district court of the opportunity to "consider [the objection] and correct the injunction if necessary, without the need for appeal" (quoting Zenon, 711 F.2d at 478)).

The "lessons of history" thus give us every reason to be
wary of now blessing this most recent effort to break with our
established tradition of recognizing birthright citizenship and to
make citizenship depend on the actions of one's parents rather
than -- in all but the rarest of circumstances -- the simple fact
of being born in the United States. United States v. Di Re, 332
U.S. 581, 595 (1948). Nor does the text of the Fourteenth
Amendment, which countermanded our most infamous attempt to break
with that tradition, permit us to bless this effort, any more than
does the Supreme Court's interpretation of that amendment in Wong
Kim Ark, the many related precedents that have followed it, or
Congress's 1952 statute writing that amendment's words in the U.S.
Code.
The District Court's order for entry of the preliminary
injunctions is affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded for
further consideration consistent with this decision.

The "lessons of history" thus give us every reason to be wary of now blessing this most recent effort to break with our established tradition of recognizing birthright citizenship and to make citizenship depend on the actions of one's parents rather than -- in all but the rarest of circumstances -- the simple fact of being born in the United States. United States v. Di Re, 332 U.S. 581, 595 (1948). Nor does the text of the Fourteenth Amendment, which countermanded our most infamous attempt to break with that tradition, permit us to bless this effort, any more than does the Supreme Court's interpretation of that amendment in Wong Kim Ark, the many related precedents that have followed it, or Congress's 1952 statute writing that amendment's words in the U.S. Code. The District Court's order for entry of the preliminary injunctions is affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded for further consideration consistent with this decision.

BREAKING: The First Circuit rejects Trump's executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship. In the New Jersey-led multistate case, the appeals court, in a 100-page ruling, keeps the nationwide scope of the injunction blocking the EO in place. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

03.10.2025 21:28 β€” πŸ‘ 2212    πŸ” 622    πŸ’¬ 10    πŸ“Œ 42

Watching this, with that observation in mind, is a seriously uncanny way to begin the spooky season πŸ‘»πŸ‘ 

03.10.2025 23:02 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The New Deal Masterpieces Threatened by Trump’s D.C. Downsizing Your great-grandparents paid Ben Shahn and Philip Guston to create gorgeous public murals. Next year they could be rubble.

Nobody else is writing about this, so please re-post my two-part series about the imminent sale of what one expert calls β€œthe Sistine Chapel of New Deal art.” Preservationists need to move fast.

Part one:

newrepublic.com/article/2010...

Part two:

newrepublic.com/article/2010...

03.10.2025 15:41 β€” πŸ‘ 69    πŸ” 40    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 5

I think there is wisdom in this approach. If the Court overturns birthright citizenship, it is Writing On the Wall in the biblical Feast of Belshazzar sense.

03.10.2025 22:28 β€” πŸ‘ 226    πŸ” 35    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 1

You can't remove due process from *anyone*

Not foreigners, not drug dealers, not anyone.

02.10.2025 16:04 β€” πŸ‘ 29    πŸ” 13    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ’‘ Als je dan toch al in gesprek gaat met vertegenwoordigers van extreemrechtse partijen, doe het dan zo als Frank Hendrickx & Sara Berkeljon in de @volkskrant.nl vandaag...

www.volkskrant.nl/politiek/lid...

02.10.2025 12:56 β€” πŸ‘ 31    πŸ” 14    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 3

Fascisme staat ook in het woordenboek.

02.10.2025 07:36 β€” πŸ‘ 180    πŸ” 40    πŸ’¬ 13    πŸ“Œ 1

The doctor touches John Searle’s carotid, feeling for a pulse and looking at her watch.

Searle opens one eye and whispers weakly, β€œPlease… just get it over with and say it.”

The doctor sighs and says, β€œI now pronounce you dead.”

β€œMurderer” Searle whispers as he expires.

01.10.2025 21:40 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@basilok is following 20 prominent accounts