George's Avatar

George

@fplstats.bsky.social

FPL only Bluesky account.

399 Followers  |  794 Following  |  154 Posts  |  Joined: 17.11.2024  |  1.9942

Latest posts by fplstats.bsky.social on Bluesky

Rice still getting 2 Bonus and a 6 pointer despite losing 2-1.

Such a consistent asset.

06.12.2025 14:29 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Hard to pinpoint which players to own.
Defenders never get defcon and lots of attacking rotation.

Would be interesting to see what their underlying numbers are over their period of good form…

02.12.2025 13:03 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I’m in the same boat, I think the Bluesky/X bubble is 95% but outside of that I reckon it’s much lower. Saving FH for another GW will be our differential

29.11.2025 13:11 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Dyche quote: β€œIt is like a bad back, a bit of a waking-up sort of injury – one of those ones where you sleep funny or twist funny.”

β€œAt this stage, we are not expecting it to be too serious and it is settling down already. We’re hopeful he will be right for the weekend.”

29.11.2025 09:34 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

TC feels like quite a nice differential.
Also I’d probably start Caicedo over Cucurella, almost nailed to get DC.
Then you could easily roll, I’m tempted by Thiago but just because everyone with a FH will have him this week

28.11.2025 18:06 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Wow, how is that affordable, and the rest of the team still looks good. Shame Salah and Isak are crap…

28.11.2025 16:18 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

No stick with it and keep the 1ft

01.11.2025 11:50 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Someone released information on which teams cause opponent players to get DEFCON, City were near the bottom because they are less direct and more controlled possession based.
Without seeing that information I would have agreed with you here.

31.10.2025 13:09 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Sanchez I would say slight mins risk, and when he doesn’t play it’ll be an *easy* fixture. Timber seems more nailed

10.10.2025 16:08 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Timber for 1 week

03.10.2025 06:50 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Your team looks strong, keep rolling

02.10.2025 08:53 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

WC seems tempting, need all those forest players gone…

30.09.2025 20:34 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Looks good, some nice differentials, really like Bowen and Sarr.

I’d say maybe Raya for Pope and someone instead of Timber, just in case if Ben White taking minutes away from him…

30.09.2025 20:29 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah Pedro to Gyok seems a strong move, although JP is nailed and has missed out last 2 GWs due to red cards. I still expect him to get returns.

Two spurs attack needs fixing, but maybe not with Leeds next.

I’ve got Wood and MGW so Wood to Gyok and MGW to a 7.6m or under midfielder for me.

29.09.2025 13:33 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I’m in a similar situation, used WC, BB and TC.

For all those players (maybe other than Cucurella) I can give an argument to hold for at least 2 GWs

Spurs are difficult because of CL rotation…

29.09.2025 13:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

If you want more confirmation bias, spurs’ defensive numbers are very good so far this season…

26.09.2025 15:23 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

Most of the data stuff I see here now is expected points, and that makes me sad. So here's some radars.

I updated last season's radar code just to check if Wirtz has been as bad as suspected, and the answer is basically yes.

22.09.2025 14:55 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

These visuals are so useful, could you do one for Bruno and Reijnders?

22.09.2025 14:58 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Exact same here, what a disaster

22.08.2025 18:55 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Ok thank you, I’m surprised by the lack of Kelleher on the Bluesky community, seems the flag has put a lot of people off

15.08.2025 13:47 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

What do you think the chances of Kelleher starting are? I’ve got Dubravka on the bench in case Kelleher doesn’t play…

15.08.2025 13:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

FH38 drip-feed thread. 🧡

Just a bunch of random research notes, findings and thoughts as I build a FH38 team.

For context, my rank is pretty poor (565k) - combination of bad luck, variance and going relatively rogue over the past # of GWs πŸ« πŸ˜… - but I do want to go out with a good GW ofc!

24.05.2025 12:01 β€” πŸ‘ 19    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0

Very strong, I was looking at the other Liverpool attackers too but I was put off by them only playing 60/70 mins

23.05.2025 18:14 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Enjoy the game!

21.05.2025 17:12 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Oh yes good point, Neto seems a safe pick for xMins then

12.05.2025 16:43 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Good shouts, I was thinking of getting a Villa mid. Hard to predict who starts though, same with Chelsea wingers.

12.05.2025 11:02 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Need a transfer tip for GW37…

I’m using FH38, so I need a one week punt for one of my 7 attackers.
Β£1.9 itb

Any suggestions?

12.05.2025 10:35 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah loads of people will do that too

28.04.2025 17:56 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This makes Isak > Ollie Watkins more appealing…
- Should get 90 most weeks
- 2 goals 2 assists in last 4 starts
- Good fixtures:
FUL
bou
TOT (after Europa semi)
mun (possibly after Europa final)

Ollie Watkins differential for final 4 games?

28.04.2025 15:55 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

FH38 has always worked well for me before. Once climbed me up from ~50k to 11k in the final game-week, but that is an extreme example

24.04.2025 16:48 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@fplstats is following 18 prominent accounts