's Avatar

@highcourt.bsky.social

218 Followers  |  697 Following  |  40 Posts  |  Joined: 17.11.2024  |  2.3303

Latest posts by highcourt.bsky.social on Bluesky


I work in that area and saw that. Not sure what the reason was, other than as a show of force.

09.01.2026 00:23 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

One of us? This Gen Xer is not crazy like you people. I only drink iced coffee when it’s at least fifty degrees out

03.01.2026 02:34 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I’ll go with the 3rd just so I don’t have to let ICE agents or military members stay in my house

06.08.2025 23:59 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

2006 was good as it was a blue wave year

06.08.2025 19:07 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

True. I’m in the demographic that only uses Youtube for watching old sporting events, not for getting news/β€œvibes”

30.07.2025 14:57 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Going back to Fort Lee Nj?

30.07.2025 11:36 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Brooklyn Bagel in Arlington

11.07.2025 15:16 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

They fail to mention that FEMA didn’t preposition resources like Urban Search & Rescue Teams, which would have allowed them to to do life saving work as soon as the disaster declaration was signed on Monday. Prior to 2025, this was done routinely

10.07.2025 23:25 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Richardson was in New Orleans today for the FEMA Review Council meeting

09.07.2025 23:15 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

when bus fare was free in DC during COVID, the best part about it was that you could board by any door, not just the entrance by the fare box/driver. That made getting on/off the bus much easier, a big plus

08.07.2025 20:23 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

We all know socialists like to play fast and loose with the First Amendment under the guise of β€œmoney isn’t speech”

17.06.2025 22:20 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

FEMA doesn’t have block grants (a misused term).. Starlink does have contracts with FEMA funded out of the Disaster Relief Fund for satellite phone communications after disasters however

11.06.2025 14:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

This is under Title 10, but not the Insurrection Act, so Posse Comitatus Act still applies (military forces can’t be used for law enforcement purposes)

08.06.2025 03:00 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Posse Comitatus Act applies if the Guard is put in Title 10, and they can’t be used for federal law enforcement unless POTUS invokes the Insurrection Act.

07.06.2025 23:59 β€” πŸ‘ 14    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Correct, unless POTUS puts them in a title 10 status, the Gov has control of the California Guard.

07.06.2025 23:56 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The MAGA faithful celebrate the end of the Trump-Musk bromance Patrons of the pro-Trump Butterworth’s Restaurant hope that the feud that broke out Thursday between the two men marks the end of Musk’s influence in Washington.

I keep wanting to call this Bannon-World Capital Hill hangout β€œMrs. Butterworth’s”

www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...

06.06.2025 12:31 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Baked & Wired in Georgetown

30.05.2025 21:12 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Red chowder is Manhattan clam chowder. NE clam chowder is always white and milk-based

24.05.2025 17:02 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Arbitrary & Capricious

01.05.2025 02:13 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The building is actually overcrowded, as they took away all our telework and flex work schedules

30.04.2025 21:11 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

who’s going to issue Final Agency Decisions in EEO cases? Or decide appeals?

21.03.2025 18:11 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

i hated that movie when it came out, and was annoyed everyone else seemed to love it. Pup Fiction was by far the best movie of 1994

17.03.2025 01:06 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

hard pass

15.02.2025 02:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

i used to use their cafeteria, when it was still open

05.02.2025 21:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

it’s only acceptable if it’s offered to all federal employees on the same terms (unlikely)

04.02.2025 13:52 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I still have yet to see any authority cited for this offer,

04.02.2025 12:36 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Federal employees whose PII is accessed or disclosed w/o authorization could file a PrivacyAct complaint. That’s not ripe for legal action yet, until we have more facts. Other laws to consider: DOGE is basically a violation of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as it’s not authorized by Congress.

01.02.2025 19:15 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

True, but with this Supreme Court, I wouldn’t rule anything out, sadly.

24.01.2025 21:12 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Red state legislators would never allow it

24.01.2025 17:32 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, they’re supposed to have a charter listing their membership, which is required to be β€œfair and balanced”. Also required to publish meetings in the Federal Register, and make them open to the public

20.01.2025 04:07 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@highcourt is following 19 prominent accounts