austin

“we love the people inside so much we’re attempting to remove their legal status, right to work, and exile them to a violent failed state to which they have no ties”

Ultimately, Petitioners may, because of the arcane United States immigration system, return to their home country, involuntarily or by self-deportation. But that result should occur through a more orderly and humane policy than currently in place. Philadelphia, September 17, 1787: "Well, Dr. Franklin, what do we have?" "A republic, if you can keep it." With a judicial finger in the constitutional dike, It is so ORDERED. SIGNED this 31st day of February, 2026. 7um Jing FRED BIERY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Credit: Bystander Matthew 19:14 John 11:35 There is also the photo of the boy from the viral stories included.

Federal judge has ordered the release of Liam Ramos (the bunny hat boy) and his father. A brief and rather remarkable order. Clearly written to be shared widely, so please do. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

real e type vibes there… but several years ahead

JUST IN: #SCOTUS grants review in one case, Salazar v. Paramount Global. Q is whether tracking pixels on websites trigger a 1988 law aimed at secrecy for video rental lists, the Video Privacy Protection Act. 6th Cir said no: www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf...

jaderemedy • 4h ago And now comes the most nauseating part of this whole goddamn mess: the hypocrisy. The same loud-mouthed idiots who spent years screaming about tyranny are suddenly dead fucking silent, or worse, cheering, now that it's their side doing it. "ThEy'Re cOminG fOr OuR gUnS!" "GoVerNMenT oVerReAch!" "ShAll nOt bE inFrinGeD!" All that chest-thumping bullshit evaporated the second armed federal agents started terrorizing people they don't like. Let me get this straight: a civilian gets shot dead by federal agents, and the only thing you brainless cunts can muster is "well, DHS says he had a gun"? THAT'S your red line? Guns are sacred when they're strapped to your waist, but magically become a death sentence when they're used as a post-hoc excuse by the government? Either the Second Amendment applies to everyone, or you never believed in it at all. Fucking pick one and own it. This is exactly what tyranny looks like, by the way. Not jackboots marching in formation, but armed agents roaming neighborhoods, stopping people, killing civilians, and then daring the public to question it. Tyranny is execution followed by a press release. Tyranny is labeling the dead a "threat" so the state doesn't have to explain why someone's life just ended in the street. Tyranny is demanding obedience while shredding due process and calling it order. And all you so-called "freedom lovers" are fucking fine with it, as long as it's brown people, immigrants, protesters, or anyone you've already dehumanized. Turns out "don't tread on me" actually meant "tread on them." You weren't afraid of tyranny. You were afraid of losing dominance. There's a difference, and this moment exposes it completely. "Just comply" isn't a principle. It's cowardice dressed up as common sense. It's the language of people who have already accepted that the state gets to decide who deserves rights and who doesn't. And once you make that deal, don't act shocked when the line moves, because it always fuckin…

Absolute banger of a comment on r/military:

www.reddit.com/r/Military/c...

no question. fuck ice

elections are conducted by the states, not the federal government. it won’t be so easy.

if they’re detaining the pick jacket lady this would be next level lawlessness

well that’s an execution

👊🏽 D state AGs think they’re the only officials standing up to Trump. They are probably right. At this 🔥 town hall:
- Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield
- Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison
- California Attorney General Rob Bonta
🎁 By @sarahjeong.bsky.social:
is.gd/j7ZTEO

🧵 is.gd/oPQNTy

one of the clearest and earliest sign of the current schism was the split between joy and anger when presented with the prospect of taco trucks on every corner

a woman in a tan coat interviews a man in a black parka, the mayor of spitsbergen. it’s winter, snow covered, and looks like what you’d expect for the arctic, except for a colorful truck with “salsa“ “taco" and “mole“ in the background

watching austrian tv interview with the mayor of spitzbergen in the arctic circle, all part their round the clock coverage of this bullshit, and i’ll damned if it’s not a fucking taco truck. at 78 degrees north. amazing.

Photo by Pierre Lavie. Yes this is me. And I threw my Leica. It landed on the bass plate with hardly a scratch. Another Photographer grabbed it along with my phone and I was able to track him later. I was held face down tear gas deployed right in front of me and pepper sprayed directly into the eye.

yeah, they’re not registered tho…..

are they a data broker subject to delete act?

george floyd protests/riots; somali population + convenient fraud story; tim walz/anti democrat grievance; small enough to raid with a couple thousand agents… imo a lot of hooks to rw media narratives + knowing they’ll get the chaotic content they want, bonus if they find a pretext for escalation

you’ll sometimes get something to the effect of “where do you think your food comes from” and i do want to know what in all this has anything to do with ag policy, and in fact isn’t actively hostile to it

indeed, a network signal would be great. the closest to device signaling is ”ask app not to track“ in ios, which will zero out ad ids. a great many workarounds for advertisers, to be sure, though

it’s essentially an html header field sent by a client/browser with each website navigation request that can be detected via javascript on the destination website. i don’t think you could do that at a network level.

the times broke it down this morning (finally) including that he walked from behind to the front of the car

they figured it out this morning

jfc

these are outright lies

If you won't listen to us, maybe you'll listen to this horse.

In response to SSRN's removal of Professor Edwards's "The Originalist Case for the President's Power to Pardon State Offenses," I have posted "A Response to SSRN's Removal of Jerry Edwards's 'The Originalist Case for the President's Power to Pardon State Offenses'"
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

needless to say, those ag challenges are a ways off, are highly questionable on the merits, and much of the order will be challenged on constitutional grounds

it’s not a ban and doesn’t overturn state laws. it directs commerce dept to look at state laws and the ag to challenge those that the ag determines violate the commerce clause and inhibit “us ai dominance“, plus tries to withhold broadband funding for states that have laws the admin doesn’t like

Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered: Section 1.  Purpose.

the eo attempting to limit state ai laws is live www.whitehouse.gov/presidential...

Preparing a class touching on the origin of data protection law, found this amazingly prescient BBC interview (same year of Hesse legislation) x.com/BBCArchive/s...

and, all else equal, nearly every owner would probably be happy if it consumed less gas