Timo Lüddecke

This is joint work with @aecker.bsky.social

28.11.2025 13:25 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

More information (with additional results on DinoV3, SigLIP2 and Perception Encoder):

📄 Paper (in TMLR): openreview.net/forum?id=neM...
📊 Website: eckerlab.org/projects/deap/
💻 Code: github.com/timojl/deap

…or drop by our poster at the ELLIS UnConference on December 2nd in Copenhagen. #EuRIPS

28.11.2025 13:25 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

plot on relationship between performance and backbone properties

Based our performance data for all backbones, we analyze to which degree performance can be attributed to general properties of the backbone (input image resolution, feature dimension, number of parameters). We find strong relationships with all properties for semantic segmentation and depth.

28.11.2025 13:25 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

relative performance-runtime plot

A closer look into the three instance awareness tasks (instance discrimination, instance boundary detection, object detection) reveals that self-supervised learning outperforms vision-language (CLIP-style) pretraining.

28.11.2025 13:25 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

performance-runtime plots

We compare supervised, self-supervised and vision-language backbones with respect to instance awareness, local semantics and spatial understanding. Here we show the trade-off between forward pass runtime and local semantics and spatial understanding performance:

28.11.2025 13:25 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

📣 Paper alert: We present dense attentive probing (DeAP), a method to measure the representation quality of various vision backbones for dense prediction tasks. It uses small, parameter-efficient readouts with learnable masks to generate dense predictions from backbone features of any size.

28.11.2025 13:25 — 👍 5    🔁 2    💬 1    📌 0