Mostly Replies

Somehow, as an atheist, I have no problem with this whatsoever. An atheist surely is not motivated by this reasoning but it shows that it is indeed motivated reasoning.

In this case, things that stereotypical girls like = having breasts and vaginas

Either one.

Learning about multiple religions and science in school is good. Students would still be free to practice their religion on their own right?

Give me an example of a law that you think should be on the books to make it so freedom of religion is no longer ridiculous.

Abuse is bad of course but freedom of religion means that you get to believe what you want. It doesn't mean you get to abuse ppl. Telling ppl what you believe and other ppl believing it too is not, in itself, abuse. Freedom of speech may result in abuse too. Is freedom of speech also ridiculous?

Just like 2 states decided to split their electoral votes, proportionaloty gives us much better representation. EC should also be proportional in the same way. Senators too. The party names in this article need some work though. Plus we'd need to get the divided Congress to vote for this 😐

I don't think you can separate church and state without freedom of religion. Those two things are one thing.

What alternative is there? Taking away someone's right to think something can only create a totally unenforceable crime. You can criminalize what ppl do to others, but not really what they think. What should we do instead of liberty?

Keep your hands off of my not even allowed to do that.

Demonstrating that two competing gods were trying to make it seem like the other one existed would falsify atheism.

Decrying DEI because you think it means hiring unqualified ppl over more deserving candidates while simultaneously hiring cronies with no qualifications or experience of any kind (or supporting those who are) is just maximally hypocritical.

13 states. I'm all for it.

Truly the most predictable thing. McBride was right to just let them show their whole ass. Surprised it was this fast. The funniest part is Boebert saying she learned her lesson and it won't happen again. Lol they want this to happen over and over forever until every1 learns the same obvious lesson.

Make em peel it off if they care. In the meantime, it's Schrodinger's cat.

Let's make millions of tiny little middle finger stickers to put over the sex on everyone's driver's license.

They are saying gametes on purpose to erase you. This is not an ignorant accident. Your disappointment is their clearly stated goal. This is their attempt to have 0 intersex or trans ppl, legally speaking. Just remember that such erasure only happens on paper and they can't erase real ppl!

That's how you know whether you are safe or in danger...the gametes.

I am hesitant but tempted to find a silver lining. They have painted themselves into a corner. They have narrowed sex down to a single thing so ppl should just ignore that thing, since it has nothing to do with anything. Trans ppl aren't asking to change gametes!

Exactly. They don't give a f&@k about those things. The harm is the point. Infant surgery will likely become mandatory. They think gametes are science and hormones aren't.

That is what they want more than anything in the world. They don't care if it makes sense. Only one thing is binary about sex so they went with that. It will be terrible for certain ppl and that is what they want.

Not ignorance...they are purposefully talking about gametes in order to include intersex ppl under this. That is why they didn't say chromosomes or reproductive anatomy. There is only one thing binary about sex so they went for that.

Look at the language. There is a reason why the talked about gamete production. It's because they plan on using this to cover all trans and intersex ppl.

Large reproductive cells you mean?

They want to make sure that intersex ppl are also sorted into the two categories. Every word is calculated. But carving out gender identity means this is just the beginning of the shit they plan on doing.

That is why they used that language...so they can sort intersex ppl into a binary too. Gamete production is the only thing binary about sex classification.

Humans don't produce both sperm and eggs at once. That is why they chose the language. It's the only thing about sex that is binary. The thing is that for trans and intersex rights, gametes are unrelated to gender identity and social practices.

They are trying to enforce a binary and gamete production is the only thing about sex classification that is binary. They will use this to enforce a sex binary for everyone.

Their end goal is to split intersex ppl into male and female categories based on gamete production since gamete production is the only aspect of sex that is actually binary. The strategy is all or nothing and the winner is: Nothing!

But that has big "be right back" energy and Jesus would've known he used to be God and would've said so. Also, his cruxifiction made the story work which implies that it was acted out with no actual sacrifice or even inconvenience for God.