+1 I rarely get much stuff done when caring for the kids, except when the dishwasher needs unloading :-D
10.08.2025 17:28 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0@modrakm.bsky.social
Biostatistics/bioinformatics at Charles University, 2nd faculty of Medicine. Bayesian in practice, but not a fan of Bayesianepistemology. Main on fedi: https://bayes.club/@modrak_m Blog: https://martinmodrak.cz
+1 I rarely get much stuff done when caring for the kids, except when the dishwasher needs unloading :-D
10.08.2025 17:28 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0New paper with @richarddmorey.bsky.social now out in JASA, where we critically examine p-curve. Below is Richard’s excellent summary of the many poor statistical properties of p-curve (with link to paper). I wanted to add some conceptual issues that we also tackle in the paper.
09.08.2025 21:18 — 👍 50 🔁 19 💬 2 📌 2Cover page for the manuscript: Morey, R. D., & Davis-Stober, C. P. (2025). On the poor statistical properties of the P-curve meta-analytic procedure. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2025.2544397
Abstract for the paper: The P-curve (Simonsohn, Nelson, & Simmons, 2014; Simonsohn, Simmons, & Nelson, 2015) is a widely-used suite of meta-analytic tests advertised for detecting problems in sets of studies. They are based on nonparametric combinations of p values (e.g., Marden, 1985) across significant (p < .05) studies and are variously claimed to detect “evidential value”, “lack of evidential value”, and “left skew” in p values. We show that these tests do not have the properties ascribed to them. Moreover, they fail basic desiderata for tests, including admissibility and monotonicity. In light of these serious problems, we recommend against the use of the P-curve tests.
Paper drop, for anyone interested in #metascience, #statistics, or #metaanalysis! @clintin.bsky.social and I show in a new paper in JASA that the P-curve, a popular forensic meta-analysis method, has deeply undesirable statistical properties. www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.... 1/?
08.08.2025 18:55 — 👍 263 🔁 118 💬 17 📌 26this is really good -- completely aligns with where ive come to myself on this after much difficulty and costly error
03.08.2025 09:08 — 👍 30 🔁 2 💬 3 📌 0My experience also supports that. The workout/exercise stuff was explained to a hopeless ~22yo me by a friend and he was right: the effects of workout on your mental state and relationship to your body are both more important and easier to achieve than any noticeable change in your appearance.
03.08.2025 18:49 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0So I think there is a niche of things like tool benchmarks where what you want to do is empirics in silico and this type of prereg can make sense. Though I agree that in a fashion typical to COS they assume a single type of simulation study they are familiar with is the only possible type..
30.07.2025 19:24 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0And already at the time there was a long history of unfulfilled claims that the next game revolution will be in AI. Turns out that "smart" or "optimal" and "fun to play" only very rarely align. "smart" often meant hard to debug, hard to tweak to match design goals and expensive computation 2/2
29.07.2025 09:28 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It's just terminology: when I was involved in game AI (2010s), ~90% of industry-oriented articles self-described as AI were on navigation, finite state machines and behavior trees (kinda like decision trees). Making something that's fun to play with/against and eats little CPU is hard! 1/2
29.07.2025 09:28 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Malnutrition is on a dangerous trajectory in the #Gaza Strip, marked by a spike in deaths in July.
The crisis remains entirely preventable. Deliberate blocking and delay of large-scale food, health, and humanitarian aid has cost many lives.
Statement from WHO.
www.who.int/news/item/27...
Haha, so chatgpt's new agent feature has a warning that if you send the agent to do stuff, it may give bad people access to your data. Necessary, I guess, but if this is true it'd make it fairly useless, no?
I mean to me the main use case would be giving it access to sites requiring login.
Yes. To be fair to the species, the things we called "artificial intelligence" so far definitely include: if-then rules, curve fitting, route planning, brute-force search over all possible combinations.
24.07.2025 15:38 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Why would you waste compute on item-level random effects when you can use beta binomial?
18.07.2025 05:59 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0My current sincere belief is that penalized splines are essentially magic that you can use almost always with almost no penalty. (look, Gaussian processes, I love you too, you are very elegant, but you are just much more finicky and give very similar results)
17.07.2025 14:04 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0My impression is that in wet-lab bio this is stronger test than in psych - you would often do a mini +/- exact replication of a previous results as baseline/positive/negative control for an experiment you are running. I was involved (stats) in one case where this proved a previous result wrong.
17.07.2025 13:58 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 02nd day of conference has been more informational and familiar to me, but others report learning a lot. My takeaway right now is, and this is not news, is open access movement has done a lot of damage while increasing access to increasingly poor research. Not even a hot take I don’t think
15.07.2025 14:48 — 👍 25 🔁 7 💬 4 📌 0Twitter Is Dead, X Is Elon’s Personal Propaganda Platform, Where Grok Checks His Feed Before Answering
Last week, Elon Musk's Grok AI started spewing extreme antisemitism, calling itself "MechaHitler" and pushing conspiracy theories about Jewish people. But that wasn't the most revealing part of…
If you can point to a package that implements it, I'd be happy to add it to the mix!
13.07.2025 04:37 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I think we really ought to consider the dramatic rise in popularity of podcasts and video essays as conclusive disproof of the 'everyone hates lectures' idea in pedagogy. Turns out that, even when faced with many alternatives, many people just like to be told something at length.
12.07.2025 14:14 — 👍 270 🔁 44 💬 14 📌 2It was surprisingly hard to find a package that would compute profile intervals in a simple and reliable way for NB regression, so I was very glad for glmmTMB!
11.07.2025 13:23 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I'd also expect the stuff to be fragile - best estimator of phi in fixed effects regression may not be the best with random effects or when you put predictors on phi, ... 2/2
11.07.2025 09:44 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I purposefully didn't :-D The point I am trying to make is that sticking to default settings and standard packages carries higher risk in freq than in Bayesian methods (at least sometimes, caveat, caveat, ...). Few people have the expertise to fine-tune their freq estimator (I certainly don't). 1/2
11.07.2025 09:44 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0This is happening because actual honest small-sample-guaranteed frequentist computation is hard for non-trivial models and often requires solutions specific to a single class of models. The general freq. methods (profile likelihood, Wald intervals, ...) only work in the large data limit. 3/3
11.07.2025 05:48 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0A plot of coverages of 95% intervals of brms, glmmTMB, gamlss and glm.nb for a between-group difference in negative binomial model. Brms attains good coverage, but other approaches result in too low coverage across the board.
It neg. bin regression, exact Bayesian answer is much closer to a correct frequentist answer (worst-case coverage of 95% intervals) than standard frequentist approaches. Not sure how general phenomenon this is. 2/
11.07.2025 05:48 — 👍 13 🔁 4 💬 3 📌 0New on the blog: Using Bayesian tools to be a better frequentist
Turns out that for neg. bin. regression with small samples, standard frequentist tools fail to achieve their stated goals. Bayesian computation ends up providing better frequentist guarantees. www.martinmodrak.cz/2025/07/09/u...
How can we reform science? I have some ideas. But I am not sure you’ll like them, because they don’t promise much. elevanth.org/blog/2025/07...
09.07.2025 13:40 — 👍 273 🔁 131 💬 17 📌 44New #rstats blog up!
solomonkurz.netlify.app/blog/2025-07...
This is the first in a brief series where we use {brms} to learn {Stan} code.
Many thanks to @fusaroli.bsky.social and @stephenjwild.bsky.social for their helpful reviews.
NPR's Gaza producer faced Israeli military fire, private U.S. contractors pointing laser beams at his forehead and masked thieves as he tried to get food from a U.S.-supported group.
07.07.2025 12:16 — 👍 365 🔁 136 💬 15 📌 9Just registering my take that inverse probability of treatment weighting is very naturally Bayesian. See www.andrewheiss.com/blog/2021/12... (plus I comment at the end on how to take the final step and do a joint model of weights and outcome)
28.06.2025 13:53 — 👍 5 🔁 1 💬 2 📌 0This is from Haaretz, an Israeli news site. It proves that Israeli concentration camp soldiers have been ordered to deliberately shoot at unarmed Palestinians waiting for humanitarian aid.
No Western media will run this story or even refer to it, because real Western journalism is mostly dead.
Venn diagram with Bono in the left circle, an oboe in the right, and a bonobo in the centre.
Venn diagram
21.06.2025 08:27 — 👍 4807 🔁 1054 💬 146 📌 103