Oh, weβre keeping the Associate Professor titles? I thought we might just go down to βAI Training Prompter and Reply Verification Instructor.β
24.02.2026 17:20 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@drfreedom.bsky.social
Dr [of the philosophy of] freedom. Yes, it does sound like a Marvel villain. Do-er of philosophy & law (US & UK) | BA, LLB, AM, PhD | Research freedom & free expression | Republicanism/non-domination | Constitutional lawyer(?) | π³οΈβπ | he/him | π³οΈββ§οΈ rights!
Oh, weβre keeping the Associate Professor titles? I thought we might just go down to βAI Training Prompter and Reply Verification Instructor.β
24.02.2026 17:20 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Itβs not supposed to read well?
Sorry, I thought one of the purposes of university was the provision of knowledge. An important part of which allegedly involves communication of that knowledge to the public in various forms.
Are we now just engines of AI slop?
*looks at our rule of law*
I donβt know, we seem to not be doing too terribly.
(Get back to me after the next election, though π¬)
Here's @genevievelakier.bsky.social on some of the ways in which First Amendment doctrine should evolve in recognition of "the free speech dangers that are created by authoritarian structures of control in civil society" knightcolumbia.org/blog/the-ant...
23.02.2026 20:02 β π 7 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0At this stage, I feel fairly confident in saying that the NHS/national health agencies have been taken over by dangerously anti-scientific cranks and that it will probably take at least a generation (and several changes of government) to fully wash them out.
20.02.2026 22:13 β π 66 π 18 π¬ 3 π 0SCOTUS actually did its role and checked executive power?
I thought we loved the unitary executive, he can do whatever he wants theory? (Though it may now be the he can do whatever he wants until he starts messing too much with the money machine theory).
What, and when, is a purported law βthe lawβ?
17.02.2026 12:51 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0This is common good constitutionalism.
13.02.2026 19:25 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0According to (some) Labour, they cannot change the FWS judgment. Since UKSC brought us βclarity.β
So, apparently PS is dead. Rewrite the textbooks!
Everything bad about tyranny & the arbitrary exercise of power, that republican political theorists warned about, is demonstrated endlessly by Republican politicians.
13.02.2026 11:50 β π 13 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0I had to teach judicial review today ππ
Bring on the gin. And/or wine.
Good that EHRC wrong on service provision; employment context certainly not favourable
13.02.2026 11:20 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Palestine Action JR βοΈ
EHRC Interim Guidance π
*sigh*
"We accurately misreported the information, why are you coming for us?"
12.02.2026 19:37 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0In a functional country, this would be a scandal. A service suffering only from chronic underfunding was ripped apart because the media created a myth of 1000s of complaints of malpractice. The truth - as in my familyβs experience - was very different.
www.thepinknews.com/2026/02/11/n...
I wish *someone* would just consult literally any competent philosopher that ever took even just one philosophy of mind module, once upon a time in undergrad, perhaps decades ago.
Because the tech bros have no idea what they're talking about, and please can we stop listening to them.
I cannot speak to cases for which I have no particulars, I can only state what the law actually holds. And, to point out the obvious: government can sometimes act unlawfully.
11.02.2026 10:07 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The difficulty is what is viewpoint vs non-viewpoint discrimination. And, we can think that Universities do engage and ought to engage in some kinds of viewpoint discrimination as a pedagogical function (e.g. choosing not to teach/invite poor scholarship).
11.02.2026 10:00 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0There are (legal) principles here, at ECHR level, and similar US First Amendment law shares similar ideas around 'viewpoint discrimination,' which is what is typically engaged in these cases.
TL;DR: If government cannot rescind an invitation on the basis of viewpoint, neither can a university.
Explanation: Universities are public authorities under the HRA, and therefore have the same (similar) Art 10 obligations as other government & public institutions. And HE (Freedom of Speech) 2023.
Very different from e.g. US private universities and how we think about their speech rights.
Passed my Life in the UK test today.
Was it easy? Yes.
Is it a dumb test? Also, yes.
You mean, wait for it... hormones change the body? You don't say.
(This is just how biology works. I'm also tired of the 'unfair advantage' argument when athletes are quite literally praised for genetic/biological advantages over other players).
Sorry, I canβt find the originalist. Can some point me to who the originalist is?
03.02.2026 20:23 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The tech bros are all creeps.
Can we finally stop listening to them now?
Opened Bluesky. Saw this. Will now be closing Bluesky for the day.
30.01.2026 18:37 β π 3 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Anyway congrats to our Free Speech Champions(tm) who helped usher in the most censorious American government since the Palmer Raids
30.01.2026 13:23 β π 4776 π 910 π¬ 40 π 21I refuse to put the outlook app on my phone
30.01.2026 15:09 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Sex Matters v City of London/Hampstead Heath judicial review full judgment.
Permission REFUSED.
www.judiciary.uk/judgments/se...
And this is why we need philosophy & humanities.
29.01.2026 08:48 β π 4 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Such a disingenuous βoffer.β
ICE isnβt after criminals. Theyβre going after anyone they want, including US citizens.