โA simple comparison of means, with credible random assignment, beats a complex structural model with doubtful exclusion restrictionsโ - favourite quote so far
14.02.2026 06:09 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0@sometimesdata.bsky.social
Senior research scientist in mental health and wellbeing, looking for an excuse to #rstats
โA simple comparison of means, with credible random assignment, beats a complex structural model with doubtful exclusion restrictionsโ - favourite quote so far
14.02.2026 06:09 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Great read tho! Very nice overview
14.02.2026 05:52 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0X can cause Y without correlation, but the article only describes 3 ways this can happen. There are more! Eg Y may be multidetermined so X (and W, and Z) causes Y but the correlation isnโt detectable in the presence of other causes (or spontaneous Y occurrences)
14.02.2026 05:47 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Causes can exist without correlation, but they are hard to detect without a true experiment
14.02.2026 05:40 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0โEvery student learns that correlation does not imply causation. Few learn the converse: absence of correlation does not imply absence of causation. Both mistakes are common in applied work, and understanding why reveals something fundamental about what causal inference requires.โ
14.02.2026 05:39 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Mental health interventions are now digital but over 50% of the variance in effectiveness for stress is due to differences in design and features. Expert design is needed and throwing everything at the wall is not helpful: www.jmir.org/2025/1/e71253/
22.01.2026 21:46 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0We are responding to this call for evidence:
ec.europa.eu/info/law/bet...
Do you have concrete examples of the added value of #Rstats in the public or private sectors?
Include the most important factors (risk, lock-in, security, innovation...) to assess the added value.
Thanks!
Iโm in this tweet and I donโt like it
16.01.2026 19:40 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0It's coming: bsky.app/profile/hype...
31.12.2025 01:49 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Are young Gen Z men today becoming both more disengaged (not in education, employment or training) and more likely to desire children? How would we square that circle?
30.12.2025 06:25 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0tagging @rkwilkins.bsky.social because #HILDA is a great resource for fertility researchers but I don't know where to find them!
27.12.2025 06:27 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Is there something in the water of young men today?
27.12.2025 06:18 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 0facebook was listening... facebook is always listening
27.12.2025 04:09 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Would you like to look into Medicare claims for mental health support over COVID - I think subsidies were extended for extra psych visits but canโt find records or dates. Other subsidies or State-specific programs might have been provided as well. Could provide nice evidence for treatment efficacy
19.12.2025 07:45 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Rising trend in psychological distress among school-aged youth peaked in 2022, replotted from latest results of Mission Australia Youth Survey (2012-2025)
Latest data from Australia indicates mental ill-health among 15-19 year olds has already peaked. But what caused it to peak? And what caused it to turn around?
19.12.2025 07:27 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Indeed. It seems with sensible immigration policies (skill/education based perhaps) we could trust the market to distribute the population where it will be most productive and avoid most of the ill-effects of rapid decline
12.12.2025 15:51 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Does anyone else just surf LinkedIn hoping to find a job using R, Quarto, or Shiny? #rstats
10.12.2025 19:54 โ ๐ 8 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0That seems smart
28.11.2025 22:57 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0That makes more sense than the ANCOVA to me. But my thinking is you want the effect of time because that is the only variable in the implicit DAG which is producing the change.
28.11.2025 05:35 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Devils advocate if there is no treatment group ANCOVA is the wrong choice. It answers if pre predicts post. You want if measure changes over time. Second model does that.
27.11.2025 21:35 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0That's a tough decision to go through, but getting a PhD can sometimes be an albatross around your neck. It can be hard to know what the good and bad choices are while you are making them - bad luck now can look like a good choice in a few years time and we are all navigating by the rear view mirror
27.11.2025 01:40 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0America is great when kids can't play soccer because the secret police may steal their parents
12.10.2025 18:46 โ ๐ 23 ๐ 4 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Thatโs what drove me to always declare the method!
02.10.2025 05:56 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0plot provided by @Chris_said
01.10.2025 21:49 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Trend line plot showing major depressive episodes in US teenagers peaked in 2021 and have declined since then (Source data: National Survey on Drug Use and Health)
Major depressive episodes among US teenagers peaked in 2021 and have been declining since. More evidence challenging simplistic theories of teen mental health
01.10.2025 21:49 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I did not plan to read all 240 posts on observational evidence today. I did not WANT to read all 240 posts on observational evidence today. What did you do today? Sighโฆ
09.09.2025 17:32 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0The trouble with being an #rstats celebrity is that everything you post about statistics will be taken veeeery seriously :-P
06.09.2025 02:59 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0that seems like an odd design for an RCT (would it really be an RCT?). Do you have any real world examples in mind or were you just offering a thought experiment to challenge my (our?) assumptions?
05.09.2025 19:25 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0If we distinguish along those lines, then ANCOVA is always preferred when we have a clear expectation the groups do not differ at baseline (eg RCT). Where I'm unclear is the observational case when groups may differ and we want to decide whether to equate differences with ANCOVA (or matching etc)
04.09.2025 16:49 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0this would also help me understand @f2harrell.bsky.social position on this issue better. (Frank have you ever written anything on Lord's paradox I could read somewhere?)
04.09.2025 16:45 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0