Jonathan Gienapp's Avatar

Jonathan Gienapp

@jgienapp.bsky.social

Professor of History and Law, Stanford University. Books on early Constitution: http://tinyurl.com/yynk95aa; and originalism and history: http://tinyurl.com/3dd5hnt6 jonathangienapp.com

1,390 Followers  |  419 Following  |  65 Posts  |  Joined: 20.02.2025  |  2.0907

Latest posts by jgienapp.bsky.social on Bluesky

My brilliant colleague Kate Haulman's new book is out today: The Mother of Washington in Nineteenth-Century America (Oxford, 2025). I'm obviously biased but it is really exquisite!

global.oup.com/academic/pro...

12.09.2025 02:01 β€” πŸ‘ 25    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1
Post image

When it addresses what history is most useful (founding-era) it raises an interesting q about Bruen's emphasis on *text*. Tho the court doesn't cite @jgienapp.bsky.social or Jud Campbell's work about the limited relevance of textual specification, that seems to be in the background of this worry.

27.08.2025 16:53 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Thanks! Much appreciated.

23.08.2025 15:40 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

If you're interested in constitutional governance (in this case US governance), I can strongly recommend this book from @jgienapp.bsky.social. Wonderfully lucid. And, as a (very) lay reader, I appreciated the reiterated arguments and the plain, pithy prose.

23.08.2025 08:44 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Against Constitutional Originalism A detailed and compelling examination of how the legal theory of originalism ignores and distorts the very constitutional history from which it derives inter...

7) In his new book @jgienapp.bsky.social argues that one cannot understand the Constitution without placing it into the contexts in which it was written-- none more so than the Founders' commitment to republicanism.

22.08.2025 15:39 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

directly in the face of recent historical scholarship by Jud Campbell, @jgienapp.bsky.social, and others, that demonstrates how rights at the founding were not conceived of as these textual objects only secured once codified in a constitution.

20.08.2025 14:01 β€” πŸ‘ 17    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1
Jonathan Gienapp

Jonathan Gienapp

Stephanie E. Jones-Rogers

Stephanie E. Jones-Rogers

πŸ“£ Catch OAH speakers Jonathan Gienapp & Stephanie E. Jones-Rogers in Sept at San Francisco St Univ! They'll be speaking Sept. 17 & 18 for SFSU’s Constitution & Citizenship Day Conference. #OAHLecturer

πŸ“… history.sfsu.edu/constitution...

🎀 Bring a speaker to your campus! www.oah.org/lectures/upc...

23.07.2025 20:07 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Bilder on Constitutional Regicide Mary Sarah Bilder, Boston College Law School, has posted Hater of Kings: Catharine Macaulay’s Constitutional Regicide and the Declaration of Independence, which is forthcoming inΒ Americans in Revolution, ed. Tom Cutterham and Sara Georgini (University of Virginia Press, 2026): Charles I (LC) The American Revolution was a constitutional regicide. At first glance it does not much resemble a regicide. Charles I had been executed in 1649. George III went on to live nearly half a century beyond 1776. But read the Declaration of Independence carefully and notice how large the king looms. The β€œpresent King of Great Britain” aimed to establish β€œan absolute Tyranny.” The eighteen usurpations each began with He, the king. The king embodied two particular political typologies: Prince and Tyrant. As such, he was β€œunfit to be the ruler of a free people.” This constitutional justification for regicide had been developed by British historian Catharine Macaulay in the fourth volume of her History of England. Macaulay’s history from James I to the execution of Charles I provided a historical model, theoretical explanation, and blueprint for would-be patriots. Because of Macaulay, on the far side of the Atlantic, American revolutionaries renounced their allegiance to the king–and to any king–without the complications and consequences of executing one.Β  --Dan ErnstΒ 
12.08.2025 06:13 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It’s been a hell of a run. Being Editor of @lawandhistrev.bsky.social has been the greatest honor of my career. But it had to end some time. I’ll be stepping down as Editor by next summer. I’ll give proper thanks to LHR’s Associate Editors & ASLH folks in due course. What a bittersweet moment!

07.08.2025 13:49 β€” πŸ‘ 46    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Hope you enjoy!

10.08.2025 20:59 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Balkinization: Gratitude, and a Reply in Two Parts A group blog on constitutional law, theory, and politics

Today the Balkinization blog features my reflections at the end of its seven-scholar symposium on my new book The Oldest Constitutional Question: Enumeration and Federal Power. You can find my short essay at the link below.

Many thanks to the participants.

balkin.blogspot.com/2025/07/grat...

25.07.2025 15:21 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
The Rise of the Imperial Presidency The once-obscure idea of a unitary executive is now central to debates over presidential power.

🚨Tuesday, Aug. 5 β€” Everything you need to know about the "Unitary Executive Theory" that's underwriting our new era of presidential lawlessness.

RSVP today πŸ‘‡πŸ» to get the link: brennan.swoogo.com/unitaryexecu...

@brennancenter.org @janemanners.bsky.social @jdmortenson.bsky.social @wuc3.bsky.social

25.07.2025 19:13 β€” πŸ‘ 29    πŸ” 16    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1
27.07.2025 14:35 β€” πŸ‘ 489    πŸ” 47    πŸ’¬ 16    πŸ“Œ 4

So thrilled to see @jgienapp.bsky.social's important book on this phenomenal list! Congrats to all! πŸŽ‰

28.07.2025 16:27 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Thanks!

28.07.2025 16:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

A very informative book. Well-deserved recognition.

28.07.2025 16:22 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Thanks so much!

28.07.2025 16:25 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The 2025 Cundill History Prize Longlist | Cundill Prize The jurors have chosen 15 exceptional titles to be longlisted for the 2025 Cundill History Prize.

Honored that my book is on the longlist for this year’s Cundill History Prize.

www.cundillprize.com/news/the-202...

28.07.2025 16:18 β€” πŸ‘ 71    πŸ” 15    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 3
Does Good Originalism Need Good History? One might think that originalism by definition is largely about history. After all, what does it mean to be "originalist" if not to be concerned prima

Interesting how originalists try to avoid historians' critiques. This, to me, is no more persuasive than the others. 'History' is what happened & our interpretations of it--you can't have a law of the past that isn't fundamentally yoked to trying to get that right.

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

23.07.2025 15:56 β€” πŸ‘ 118    πŸ” 22    πŸ’¬ 11    πŸ“Œ 4
Balkinization: Why Did the Framers Enumerate Congressional Powers? A group blog on constitutional law, theory, and politics

The final contribution to the Balkinization symposium on my new book *The Oldest Constitutional Question* is by Prof. John Mikhail of Georgetown. You can find it here:

balkin.blogspot.com/2025/07/why-...

@johnmikhail.bsky.social‬

Sometime soon, I'll post a response to all the symposium essays.

21.07.2025 00:51 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

This only makes me more excited. πŸ˜‰

17.07.2025 05:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
The Many Meanings of Enumeration For the Balkinization Symposium onΒ  Richard Primus,Β  The Oldest Constitutional Question: Enumeration and Federal Power Β (Harvard University ...

Brilliant essay by @jgienapp.bsky.social on Primus’s new book. balkin.blogspot.com/2025/07/the-...

13.07.2025 03:55 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Balkinization: Does Anybody Else Suffer from Enumerationism? A group blog on constitutional law, theory, and politics

Today's contribution to the Balkinization symposium on my new book, The Oldest Constitutional Question, is by Penn's William Ewald, who writes about contrasts with the British and German constitutional systems. You can find Professor Ewald's essay here:

balkin.blogspot.com/2025/07/does...

12.07.2025 15:18 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Balkinization: Will Richard Primus Get the Readership He Deserves (and the Country Needs)? A group blog on constitutional law, theory, and politics

The Balkinization blog has now posted commentary from Prof. Sandy Levinson (of the University of Texas) about my new book, The Oldest Constitutional Question. You can find Levinson's commentary at the link below.

balkin.blogspot.com/2025/07/will...

10.07.2025 17:02 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Symposium on Enumerated Powers Christina D. Ponsa-Kraus reviews my book

This week on the Balkinization blog, several excellent scholars will post essays reacting to my new book about enumerated powers. I'm honored by their engagement.

The first essay, by Prof. Christina Ponsa-Kraus of Columbia, is linked below.

open.substack.com/pub/richardp...

09.07.2025 19:46 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Here is my essay, "The Many Meanings of Enumeration," on Richard Primus's important new book, *The Oldest Constitutional Question: Enumeration and Federal Power*, as part of the symposium Balkinization is hosting on it.

12.07.2025 19:57 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Terrific book. A new way to think about an issue I thought I had a good handle on. Essential reading from @jgienapp.bsky.social

12.07.2025 15:49 β€” πŸ‘ 15    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@jgienapp is following 20 prominent accounts