Rubio is Trump's diplomatic beard.™
15.02.2026 06:28 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@kdbyproxy.bsky.social
I used to write laws… then I invented Knee Defender. ex-HPSCI, ex-Senate tech, taxes, trade/FP, ethics, antitrust… crime & even reputed parliamentarian
Rubio is Trump's diplomatic beard.™
15.02.2026 06:28 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Literal lol.
15.02.2026 04:00 — 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0And I recognized that the first one was old, as it was before they swapped in the guy falling off the ski jump for "the agony of defeat."
15.02.2026 03:57 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Burned into my adolescent brain: "The thrill of victory and the agony of defeat!" Also: Jim McKay. That is all.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vi2q...
"all the ways"? We shall see. 🛋️
bsky.app/profile/rinc...
The absurd hyperlocal drama I am in invested in: an LA bagel truck chain called (help) Yeastie Boys did a collaboration with the New York Post’s new California branch. Painted trucks red, handed out mock papers. You’re never gonna believe this but bagel truck patrons aren’t Murdoch fans, turns out
15.02.2026 01:59 — 👍 1504 🔁 126 💬 50 📌 24House Practice Manual (2024) § 24. In General; Vote Changes [snip] When a vote is being taken by electronic device, a Member is permitted to change such vote by reinserting the voting card in a voting station during the first 10 minutes of a 15-minute vote or by the Clerk’s announcement in the well after the Chair has asked for changes. 114-2, May 19, 2016, p 6772. During five-minute votes or two-minute votes, a Member is permitted to change a vote at the voting stations at any time. Following the expiration of the minimum time for voting by electronic device and the closing of electronic voting stations, but before the Speaker’s announcement of the result, any Member may either change a vote or cast an initial vote in the well by use of a ballot card.
TODAY'S QUESTION: Why do House Republicans – vociferous proponents of the so-called "SAVE [America] Act" – vote by electronic device when they could vote by the much more secure method of paper ballots?* 🤯
(* – aka, "ballot card")
#HRules
I watched it as a kid... I watched everything on ABC's Wide World of Sports, including the annual arm wrestling championships from Petaluma, California. 😳
15.02.2026 03:36 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0This is so niche. 😉👍🏻
15.02.2026 03:07 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Congrats to those who had "Olympic curling controversy" on their BINGO cards!
Oh, Canada.
www.si.com/winter-olymp...
Package of corn burgers.
15.02.2026 00:05 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0New plank fish just dropped.
14.02.2026 23:53 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 022 USC 7423, subsections (a) to (g) of the "American Servicemembers' Protection Act of 2002" - searchable text is here: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?hl=false&edition=prelim&req=granuleid%3AUSC-prelim-title22-section7423&num=0&saved=%7CZ3JhbnVsZWlkOlVTQy1wcmVsaW0tdGl0bGUyMi1zZWN0aW9uNzQyMQ%3D%3D%7C%7C%7C0%7Cfalse%7Cprelim
22 USC 7422, subsection (c), of the "American Servicemembers' Protection Act of 2002" - waiver authority - searchable text is here: uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:22 section:7422 edition:prelim) OR (granuleid:USC-prelim-title22-section7422)&f=treesort&edition=prelim&num=0&jumpTo=true
DATA: Statutory limitations and statutory presidential waiver authority from the 2022 "American Servicemembers' Protection Act", 22 USC 7422 & 7423.
#ICC #Trump
3/
It's meaningless. Rubio is Trump's diplomacy beard.
14.02.2026 21:56 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Guy on the left: "You got me out of bed for this?"
14.02.2026 20:09 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0"devolve" – a word Trump never actually uses.
14.02.2026 20:03 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0@martinanav.bsky.social
14.02.2026 19:53 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Other than impeachment and conviction, any idea on what (if anything) would be a remedy for that?
14.02.2026 19:47 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Objections in the early 2000s to political activity by *former* officers seem remote and almost quaint. But there's a pretty direct line between references to “my generals,” and “my military,” to "my voters."
14.02.2026 19:43 — 👍 9 🔁 2 💬 2 📌 0The Law Dork home page right now Exclusive: DHS based its newest refugee attack on a Trump proclamation that stated it would n... New documents filed in a key refugee case in Minnesota shed light on a broad, aggressive plan to review all refugees admitted since the start of the Biden administration. The D.C. District Court strikes back Three judges issued three rulings protecting constitutional rights in cases relating to Trump admin actions against federal inmates, Alien Enemies Act… Feb 12 • Chris Geidner Opening up the Trump admin's attack on Minnesota refugees to greater public scrutiny On Tuesday, Law Dork, with Public Justice, filed a motion to improve access to a key court case challenging ICE's new effort to detain thousands of… Feb 11 • Chris Geidner DHS's investigation of a man who emailed a DHS lawyer is over — but not the concerns it raises After 99 days, DHS retracted an administrative subpoena targeting a man following his exercise of his First Amendment rights — but never explained why… Feb 10 • Chris Geidner Two judges on the Fifth Circuit gave Trump exactly what he wants to enact mass detentions On Friday night, Judges Edith Jones and Kyle Duncan split with more than 150 judges who have ruled against the Trump admin's unilateral, harsh… Feb 8 • Chris Geidner 150 days of Kavanaugh stops, and it just keeps getting worse Kavanaugh stops would always be bad. As a tool in the Trump administration's authoritarianism arsenal, they are worse. The consequences are everywhere. Feb 5 • Chris Geidner The unfathomable Minnesota transcript that must be read, as it tells the reality of America today "I am not white, as you can see," Julie Le — a government lawyer — told a federal judge on Tuesday. "And my family's at risk as any other people that… Feb 4 • Chris Geidner
I spend my days (and many nights) diving into what's going on across the country, working to make what's happening in our courts — from district courts to the Supreme Court — and broader government accessible to everyone.
Sign up for Law Dork today to help make that work possible: www.lawdork.com
C) The next morning, Sunday, the president, seen live on the White House website, speaking from the Oval Office, tells America what he has done, stating (among other things) that he did it pursuant to the authority granted him by Article II of the Constitution.
2/
2029 – A new US president.
HYPOTHETICAL:
A) October – At The Hague a warrant is issued for Trump's arrest to be tried for war crimes.
B) Two weeks later, late on a Sat, w/o notice, the president has Trump taken into custody, flown to The Hague, turned over to the International Criminal Court.
1/
A portion of Trump's Truth Social post: "... our dinner, he was very respectful about our meeting - But with everything I have done in bringing our Country back from 'OBLIVION,' why wouldn't he be? But then I noticed his show started to devolve into the same old story - Very boring, ANTI TRUMP, no mention of the PERFECT Border, Lowest
As if Trump ever uses the word "devolve".
14.02.2026 16:52 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0This is a bizarre Britishism, the person is not meaning to be obscene athough they are meaning to be rude and annoying
14.02.2026 01:52 — 👍 265 🔁 3 💬 14 📌 7JUST IN: Knight 1st Amend. Institute & American Oversight ask 11th Circuit to force Judge Aileen Cannon (Trump) to release Vol. II of Special Counsel Jack Smith's report AND to block her from ordering it destroyed as Trump's co-defendants have asked. Doc: www.documentcloud.org/documents/27...
13.02.2026 23:19 — 👍 788 🔁 365 💬 16 📌 12A good read. Facebook account owner gets the ACLU to push back against a DHS subpoena and... DHS folds.*
(* – past performance may not be indicative of future results)
DHS is being more aggressive than ever targeting anonymous social media accounts that have spoken out against ICE, asking Big Tech to hand over information on users without signed judicial warrants
story w/ @sheeraf.bsky.social
www.nytimes.com/2026/02/13/t...
A dear friend of mine passed today from a sudden, hospital-acquired infection. I’ll have more to say about her, but among many other things she was a lifelong birdwatcher. In honor of her and in lieu of #FridayNightZillow, asking for pics of favorite birds you’ve seen. I’ll start
14.02.2026 00:42 — 👍 780 🔁 52 💬 187 📌 4Big Dick Toilet Salesman, thinking about firing the person who thought he should be on a panel with AOC.
bsky.app/profile/ocas...
Clips from Hinds' Precedents of the House, re tie votes, specifically re tie votes on appeals of rulings of the chair. From Feb 1, 1840, that a tie vote would sustain the ruling (section 4569); from March 4, 1898, that a tie vote apparently would not sustain the ruling (section 5239).
Clips from Hinds' Precedents of the House, re tie votes, specifically re tie votes on appeals of rulings of the chair. From May 31, 1790, that a tie vote apparently would sustain the ruling (section 6956); from May 12, 1852, that a tie vote would not sustain the ruling (section 6957). The chair said, "The burden of getting a majority is with the affirmative."
In the Senate, a tie vote loses.
In the House, a tie vote also loses, UNLESS it's on an appeal of a ruling of the chair, in which case the precedents say it wins… sometimes. 🤷🏻♂️
NB: When a ruling is appealed, the vote is on this question – "Shall the decision of the Chair stand?"
#HRules #SRules