5
24.11.2025 15:18 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@davidkhopps.bsky.social
Freelance cricket and travel writer (just), ex ESPNcrinfo & Guardian. Social Liberal. Beach hotel at suitelanka.com. Leeds fan. Often exasperated.
5
24.11.2025 15:18 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0There's fair criticism and there's the sort of totally unacceptable stuff that people have to suffer day after day on X.....
24.11.2025 10:27 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Also, a great Villa wall. He can see sod all until that ball comes dipping and swerving over the wall. Execute it well and it goes in.
24.11.2025 10:23 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Brilliant dipping free kick. Totally unsaveable. I'm with Joe Hart. There again, I let in some soft ones in Leeds Sunday Combination Division 6 so I'm very forgiving that way....
24.11.2025 10:21 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I agree we looked disorganised after the subs and change of formation. But you simply can't prep for an exceptional free kick like that. (Or blame Perri).
24.11.2025 10:18 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Fair about Harry Brook!
24.11.2025 07:21 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Tough luck has happened about 4 matches now? So is that just tough luck and we deserved much better? Or is character fate? (With apologies to Thomas Hardy students everywhere). I like Daniel Farke for the "Southgate reasons" but he needs a miracle now. Little individual brilliance to bale him out.
23.11.2025 19:32 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0When, rarely, he did sub proactively (at 1-1, as you said) it didn't make sense. With Okafor a terrible defensive winger, Stach's injury had already exposed us on the left. Then going James for Tanaka made it worse surely? OK, Gudmundsson slipped, but a lot was being asked of him with that change?
23.11.2025 19:28 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I am reluctantly coming to that view. He is landed by a lack of creative players. But he has been so conservative in the Premier League and routinely tends to sub too late. Throwing on about 4 attacking players for the last 15 minutes - a favourite response - smacks more of desperation than tactics.
23.11.2025 18:45 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0England to prepare with pink golf balls ahead of day-night Brisbane Test.
22.11.2025 09:55 โ ๐ 27 ๐ 6 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 0Nice to know at a time when Test cricket is barely recognisable that Yorkshire, at least, are keeping up traditions by having another row over Geoffrey Boycott. ๐คฃ
archive.is/Pb1ID
I blame this Test match on mobile phones personally.
21.11.2025 13:01 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Nice. Macbeth particularly apt methinks.
21.11.2025 12:39 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Never too late
21.11.2025 12:34 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0They canโt even quite sync their own commentary with the pictures!
21.11.2025 12:06 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0The days when you remember how good Sky's cricket coverage is...
21.11.2025 09:07 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 2 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 0He had already retired 3 years earlier
20.11.2025 19:54 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0That probably makes both of them then. ๐คท
20.11.2025 18:43 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Iโve just watched Steve Smithโs excruciating pre-Ashes, smug sledge of Monty Panesar. OK, Montyโs appearance on Celebrity Mastermind was a guilty pleasure, but I reckon even Monty could answer the question about whether Smith was being a bit of a c***. #ashes
20.11.2025 18:17 โ ๐ 11 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 4 ๐ 0Yes, I realise I have just put up an anti-democratic argument, and the slippery slope concern is valid, but I just wish that some people were up to the task. There again, I have never forgiven people for Brexit or for a racist being 30% in the polls.
20.11.2025 12:54 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I've not got a problem with this. I don't have a huge amount of faith in juries. The couple I've sat on, too many people hadn't got a clue what was going on. The theory is a damn sight better than the practice.
20.11.2025 12:32 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0New take on Covid. ๐คฃ
20.11.2025 12:28 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I do find these sort of vacuous questions utterly tiresome. Why can't the BBC take a lead, underline its worth, and aim to be more intelligent?
www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/202...
I've compromised. I'm up at 5am and plan to whizz through the first 2 sessions with the fast forward button. I mean, who needs to watch people walking back to their mark? (Some people question my ability to get up at 5 anyway). Slightly more faith in England than the TNT commentary team. We'll see.
20.11.2025 11:35 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Hereโs a good one for yer. Got up at 515am to clear all snow off daughterโs car for her. She was at work at 6.In me Dressing gown & trainers I was. Cleared it all off,she came out,got in car,thanked me & drove off, Went back to get int house. Sheโd fkin locked me out. Had to get out lass up. ๐๐
20.11.2025 05:59 โ ๐ 20 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 0Oddly, I am weirdly grateful to know that ๐คฃ๐คฃ๐คฃ
18.11.2025 19:58 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Well, Iโve finished The Hack, and, yes, the sub-plot is overly protracted in the early episodes, but I am still bewildered by The Guardianโs critical review of a series that lauds it for a necessary and lonely battle against phone hacking. Seriously, with all due respect, with friends like thatโฆ. ๐คทโโ๏ธ
18.11.2025 19:49 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0POV: you are a young woman celebrating a recent academic success
17.11.2025 19:20 โ ๐ 20320 ๐ 3251 ๐ฌ 3186 ๐ 817Qualifying reminding us why the World Cup is the greatest thing ever. If only there wereโฆ
www.amazon.co.uk/Secret-Histo...
The survey also asked about refugees being able to apply to become citizens. A plurality (44%) agrees that โIf someone was granted refugee status and lived legally in Britain for six years, they should be able to apply to become a British citizen, regardless of how they arrived in the UK to claim asylum,โ while a third (33%) disagree. Six in ten Labour voters (62%) and Lib Dems (60%) are supportive of refugees being able to become citizens, regardless of how they arrived in the UK, while 20% of Labour voters disagree. Conservatives are split, with 40% agreeing that refugees should be able to apply to become a British citizen, regardless of how they arrived in the UK, while 42% disagree. Reform voters respond quite differently, with 68% disagreeing with the statement.
A problem with politicians - our Prime Minister Keir Starmer seems to be a paradigm example - trying to appeal to views they don't really understand or empathise with - that generates lurid overcompensation: so "control" becomes not control + decency + fairness but control as performative cruelty
17.11.2025 15:26 โ ๐ 42 ๐ 13 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0