Nate

I’d argue it’s justified based on the quality of most of the homes these national new home builders put out 🤣

I simply wouldn’t go to Texas

Would be interested in how THC consumption overlays with this. There is a reason the alcohol industry spent truckloads of money fighting legalization

a pile of money is sitting on a table and a person is taking money out of a box . ALT: a pile of money is sitting on a table and a person is taking money out of a box .

I’m buckled securely into my puts

Yeah I assume it is going down to test the next level at this point

I presume it made up completely of Bubbas

The risk doesn’t magically go away just because they didn’t have any this year…

Make fresh cranberry sauce, it is super easy much better

Gonna see a 7 handle

homer simpson from the simpsons is standing in front of a grassy field . ALT: homer simpson from the simpsons is standing in front of a grassy field .

Me who watches both shows regularly

Heard Eric on Bloomberg radio just before the close yesterday, he was a raging asshole

lol. Although one of the guys at the McLaren dealership did tell me there were some credit unions that would offer 144 month loans a couple of years ago (I was there looking at a normal ass car someone traded in, not a super car unfortunately)

The funniest part is giving your ex-wife all of your pre-tax accounts and keeping the taxable/cap gain assets in a divorce is such a win

Sounds confusing as well. Yeah we take Visa, well not *that* visa

*that*

They being said there are moral gray-ish ways to deflect it - liberal disclaimers, liability shifting via cursory attorney reviews (which legal zoom already does) etc

Yeah, you are right. You are articulating the way I feel about autonomous driving, the inflection point is not whether the software is better than humans, it is where it is nearly flawless because the liability should trace back to the manufacturer.

On one hand, I’d like to think what I do
Is irreplaceable, on the other I review absolutely malpractice-worthy documents from licensed attorneys on a regular basis. I’m getting closer to the Musk-esk argument “yeah, but human drivers make more mistakes” every day and it makes me sad, but it is true

Only if you are limiting your thinking to the existing paradigm (which, as a former practicing attorney, I am partial to). If AI gets good enough that is not necessarily true.

Since I sit on the finance side now, not sure what type of tools are being offered to attorneys on this front already. Risk on the client-facing side is regulatory overhang from all the bar associations, but the form based companies have found a way through

I could see two spots potentially - 1 actually helping people understand their various choices; 2 - Transmuting individual’s custom requests into concise legal language. It’s half baked idea for me, I’m sure someone is working on it already.

Docs need to be state specific, but relatively minor variations across states. Would be a natural progression for someone like a legal zoom but don’t know what they have in the pipeline

I think we could get there for software/AI generating Estate Planning docs for 95% of situations. I have the legal knowledge if someone has the tech knowledge for a side project..

To clarify, I was talking about our society more generally. If the promise of AI is realized, it is a windfall for a few and a potential disaster for most

It’s been a slow descent. Social media hallowed out the media, social media is tearing apart America at the seams. AI will finish us off if we don’t regulate it

People live in their own algo-created bubbles. They aren’t seeing the same headlines and news as you. They think the shutdown is about healthcare for illegals and Trump is using his own money to build the ballroom. They’ve never heard of Trump coin, they aren’t seeing the worst ICE actions

Hey I know one thing we could do to help some folks with health insurance affordability..

Wake up babe, the newest Elon vaporware pump just dropped