Chris Taylor

I agree, so it will only be a tiny amount deported. Those with jobs or in training are fine.

Yes. If we have offered you asylum and you throw tat back in our face by not acceptoing work or training, then you only have yourself to blame.

That isnt true, we had return agreements but never returns direct to france.

only if the wont take up the work or education fast track.

Why arent you mentioning the work and study sceheme...does that not earn you enough likes here Peter?

Thhe ones the policy is reinstating.

Well, yes, the idea is deter that route of entry and support safe and legal routes.

This issue seems to me like it isnt a technical one, the validation is gives must be by design?

So do we hate Denmark for its migration policy, or love them for the green ones?

Maybe, but in my home city, loads have planning permissions are granted, then stall, I assume due to issues getting the projects financed. Planning is sometimes an easy scapegoat.

You should.....but here is an idea, maybe question some Americans too.....no....ok

What a stupid name for the event. Park your ego.

The high value assets, not belongings.

The policy reintroduces them.

Yeah, I think that's true, odd, but true. Im no big fan of them to put it mildly, but the hatred for them is way out of proportion.

The polls said and say you are right about those policies, the same polls will say today's immigration policies are popular too.

Read the policy, IF they have assets or income they will be expected to contribute. At least understand what it is you are criticizing.

The thing is, to some extent, it has to be, in order to be a deterrent. Accompanied by safe and legal routes its the only solution.

The hard left will never accept that truth.

They are both right.

That is a big oversimplification.

Yeah, there is a lot of that about.

Which bit?

No, it wasn't true.

It's plain not true.

So everybody who gets here with a child gets an automatic right to stay?

She said it several times today in the house.

No.

No

What?