Andrew Kim's Avatar

Andrew Kim

@andrewkim.bsky.social

Something something law, something something musicals

1,103 Followers  |  412 Following  |  351 Posts  |  Joined: 28.06.2023  |  1.9276

Latest posts by andrewkim.bsky.social on Bluesky

Post image

Steve.

08.11.2025 03:40 β€” πŸ‘ 18    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

We've seen all the fed courts greatest hits, such as ordinary preemption, complete preemption, Grable, abstention (several kinds!), ripeness, conflicting canons of statutory interpretation, and people improperly quoting "elephants in mouseholes," for some reason.

24.10.2025 04:13 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I've unfortunately spent most of my time on the Other Site, as all of the Degenerate Gamblers are over there. But I popped back on here to say #appellatebluesky, #appellatesky, or whatever we're calling it now should follow the developments on sports prediction markets.

24.10.2025 04:13 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
These platforms maintain that they offer financial services that shouldn’t be considered wagers. But are they really so different? β€œPragmatically, I think for the retail individual, they don’t see a difference,” says Kim. β€œI think retail individuals trading on these platforms are not thinking of it as not gambling. They’re just thinking of it as one more outlet for them to participate in the opportunity to put money on an event.” Recent research supports this, with a study from the American Gaming Association finding that most Americans view sports-related prediction markets as a form of gambling.10 But at the same time, Kim sees some legitimate arguments from these platforms that they are offering swaps and not wagers, at least when it comes to a strict reading of the law.

Slide from a report by the American Gaming Association, titled β€œNearly All Americans Recognize Sports Events Contracts as Gambling, Not a Financial Instrument”. Contents: β€œWhat are prediction markets most like? Thinking specifically about sports related prediction contracts now. Imagine a scenario where you pay 50 cents to buy a contract that the New York Yankees will win tonight’s game. If the Yankees win, you’ll be paid $1, if they lose you would lose your 50 cents and have nothing. Would you consider this specific type of sports prediction market to be:” Pie chart, showing 85% say β€œA form of 10% gambling, like sports betting”, 6% say β€œA financial instrument, like options or commodity futures”, 10% say β€œNot sure”.
(via the American Gaming Association)

These platforms maintain that they offer financial services that shouldn’t be considered wagers. But are they really so different? β€œPragmatically, I think for the retail individual, they don’t see a difference,” says Kim. β€œI think retail individuals trading on these platforms are not thinking of it as not gambling. They’re just thinking of it as one more outlet for them to participate in the opportunity to put money on an event.” Recent research supports this, with a study from the American Gaming Association finding that most Americans view sports-related prediction markets as a form of gambling.10 But at the same time, Kim sees some legitimate arguments from these platforms that they are offering swaps and not wagers, at least when it comes to a strict reading of the law. Slide from a report by the American Gaming Association, titled β€œNearly All Americans Recognize Sports Events Contracts as Gambling, Not a Financial Instrument”. Contents: β€œWhat are prediction markets most like? Thinking specifically about sports related prediction contracts now. Imagine a scenario where you pay 50 cents to buy a contract that the New York Yankees will win tonight’s game. If the Yankees win, you’ll be paid $1, if they lose you would lose your 50 cents and have nothing. Would you consider this specific type of sports prediction market to be:” Pie chart, showing 85% say β€œA form of 10% gambling, like sports betting”, 6% say β€œA financial instrument, like options or commodity futures”, 10% say β€œNot sure”. (via the American Gaming Association)

While the law is argued in court, the distinction may not ultimately matter much to its customers. β€œPragmatically, I think for the retail individual, they don’t see a difference,” said @andrewkim.bsky.social, a lawyer specializing in gaming law.

16.09.2025 20:09 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

I feel like CAFed is like the *least* partisan federal court of appeals...

30.08.2025 22:26 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Me, telling the story of D.C.: β€œSo, there was an agency called DOGE, named after something called a memecoin. A gentleman by the name of Big Balls worked for DOGE….”

11.08.2025 14:25 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Rehearing en banc in 3... 2... 1...

08.08.2025 15:45 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Hey Siri, play "Upgrade U" by Beyonce

08.08.2025 15:12 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This is an incredibly niche thought, but do women just have Revolutionary War military costumes in their closet, or what? So many Hamilton videos have popped up out of nowhere.

07.08.2025 01:27 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Using the "decline and suggest new time" function on Outlook is an act of aggression

04.08.2025 19:30 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Chris, we need to talk about the absolutely criminal accommodation rates at the Fringe...

04.08.2025 16:04 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The beatings will continue until morale improves.

01.08.2025 20:40 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Law Professor Answers Supreme Court Questions | Tech Support | WIRED
YouTube video by WIRED Law Professor Answers Supreme Court Questions | Tech Support | WIRED

me: mindlessly watching videos on YouTube

YouTube: www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_iM...

@stevevladeck.bsky.social

20.07.2025 02:41 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Between Les Liaisons Coldplayeuses and Donald Trump's signature being used for [censored], it's been a helluva 24 hours for this country.

17.07.2025 23:21 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

So proud.

16.07.2025 04:52 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Some of us have dysfunctional ABCC11 genes, thank you very much

12.07.2025 21:52 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Could have sworn 2019 was last year

12.07.2025 21:50 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

My colleague @andrewkim.bsky.social and I were proud to partner with Planned Parenthood in opposing certiorari in this case!

03.07.2025 20:51 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Is this the monkey's paw response to me saying earlier this year that the Court should take up more Rule 23 cases?

27.06.2025 14:30 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

About that

27.06.2025 14:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Welp

27.06.2025 14:04 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Just got off a red-eye, which lasted longer than this ceasefire.

24.06.2025 11:18 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Weird flex, but ok

09.06.2025 03:31 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Shockingly, I have actually practiced before the CIT (once).

29.05.2025 13:23 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Did not see USCIT coming in off the top rope

29.05.2025 00:28 β€” πŸ‘ 15    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Was the ship named Icarus

28.05.2025 09:37 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Kudos to the man playing Civ VI on this four-hour flight. Live your truth.

21.05.2025 23:13 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It's all fun and games until you're the only person up at 2am who knows how to run a Table of Authorities

17.05.2025 23:43 β€” πŸ‘ 37    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 1

First President-Pope Emeritus.

09.05.2025 02:51 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Well, he's also a Peruvian citizen, so I'm really asking about both.

09.05.2025 01:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@andrewkim is following 20 prominent accounts