DGBassani's Avatar

DGBassani

@dgbassani.bsky.social

Widower dad of 3. Problem-solver living an unsolvable problem. Fatuity loather. Epidemiologist learning about complexity and networks. https://www.dlsph.utoronto.ca/faculty-profile/bassani-diego-g/ and https://www.isi.it/people/diego-bassani/

15,483 Followers  |  3,721 Following  |  1,660 Posts  |  Joined: 29.07.2023  |  1.8254

Latest posts by dgbassani.bsky.social on Bluesky


Preview
Introducing COS’s 2026–2028 Strategic Plan: Advancing Lifecycle Open Science The Center for Open Science (COS) has released its 2026–2028 Strategic Plan, outlining a focused, three-year direction for advancing openness, integrity, and trustworthiness in research.

COS has released its 2026–2028 Strategic Plan, outlining a focused direction for advancing openness, integrity, and trustworthiness in research. This plan aligns our work around Lifecycle Open Science (LOS)—research with publicly accessible plans, contents, and outcomes.

💡:

19.02.2026 14:13 — 👍 4    🔁 5    💬 0    📌 1

And 287M people!

19.02.2026 15:06 — 👍 5    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Video thumbnail

Normalize laughing derisively in men's faces when they deserve it.

18.02.2026 19:00 — 👍 25870    🔁 6272    💬 534    📌 1064

And many of us (voters) still remember what a being raised during a dictatorship was like. And how hard the fight for democracy was.

18.02.2026 20:34 — 👍 11    🔁 3    💬 1    📌 0

Not only pools, but most online based research. The intended respondent can easily prompt an LLM to respond instead of spending time answering.

17.02.2026 11:59 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

This is so invisible. So important

17.02.2026 03:21 — 👍 33    🔁 22    💬 5    📌 1
Preview
Wow, Elon Musk sure does like White people | Opinion Elon Musk, the world's richest man and a guy whose social media platform most companies still use, is a BIG fan of White people. Problematically so.

Terrific piece by @rexhuppke.bsky.social on Elon Musk, White Nationalist

16.02.2026 16:57 — 👍 1256    🔁 400    💬 41    📌 29

Twice! And we understood!

16.02.2026 21:36 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

the culture of silicon valley has bred a narcissism where a lot of folks think they can use agents to become the architects of a future society when, respectfully, they‘re becoming useful idiots to the billionair/trillionaire ai class and i think “token anxiety” is the gut realizing that.

15.02.2026 17:40 — 👍 158    🔁 30    💬 2    📌 0

Reminder that Francesca Albanese is not being targeted for a sentence twisted and lifted out of context in a speech.

She is being targeted for daring to name the names of giant companies complicit in the crime of genocide.

They would rather destroy international law than be accountable to it.

15.02.2026 17:32 — 👍 1271    🔁 540    💬 12    📌 7
Screencap: Are the lords of artificial intelligence on the side of the human race? That’s the core question I had for this week’s guest. Dario Amodei is the chief executive of Anthropic, one of the fastest growing AI companies. He’s something of a utopian when it comes to the potential benefits of the technology that he’s unleashing on the world. But he also sees grave dangers ahead and inevitable disruption.

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/12/opinion/artificial-intelligence-anthropic-amodei.html

Screencap: Are the lords of artificial intelligence on the side of the human race? That’s the core question I had for this week’s guest. Dario Amodei is the chief executive of Anthropic, one of the fastest growing AI companies. He’s something of a utopian when it comes to the potential benefits of the technology that he’s unleashing on the world. But he also sees grave dangers ahead and inevitable disruption. Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/12/opinion/artificial-intelligence-anthropic-amodei.html

Starting reading (or starting too, I doubt I'll make it all the way through) Douthat's interview with Amodei from a couple of days ago. From the jump it seems like yet another example of credulous journalist platforming tech CEO high his own hype.

(A 🧵, short or long depending on when I give up.)>>

15.02.2026 16:11 — 👍 90    🔁 18    💬 8    📌 4
Video thumbnail

"What they fear most is these mass movements leading eventually to some kind of accountability.”

@mehdirhasan.bsky.social and @naomiaklein.bsky.social discuss how Trump and Epstein’s elite circle fear mass movements that could bring them down.

Watch the full episode: zeteo.com/p/naomi-klei...

15.02.2026 17:26 — 👍 257    🔁 85    💬 5    📌 1
Expert engagement and evidence use in treaty negotiations
24 Pages Posted:
Anna Bezruki
affiliation not provided to SSRN

Chloe Batie
Yale University

Colin Carlson
Yale University

Date Written: February 10, 2026

Abstract
Science-and evidence-based decision-making are core values in global health, but in multilateral processes, they often take a backseat to politics. The Pandemic Agreement requires Parties to use "the best available science and evidence as the basis for public health decisions for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response," but is the treaty itself evidence-based? In this chapter, we trace how scientific and technical evidence were introduced into the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body. External experts were a key source of advice, especially on legal issues, but they were mostly excluded from the negotiations. Over time, Member States began to treat Relevant Stakeholders as a secondary source of technical expertise, introducing potential conflicts of interest into the process. In the end, scientists and stakeholders successfully leveraged scientific authority to facilitate the incorporation of One Health approach to pandemic prevention (Articles 4 and 5)-but otherwise, the treaty was shaped more by politics and pragmatism than by science. Moving forward, the Conference of Parties will be an opportunity for Member States to establish formal channels for scientific evidence synthesis and engagement-or to preserve a status quo that falls substantially behind evidence-based global governance in other areas.

Keywords: Citation networks, evidence-based policy, One Health, Pandemic Agreement, scientometrics, World Health Organization

Expert engagement and evidence use in treaty negotiations 24 Pages Posted: Anna Bezruki affiliation not provided to SSRN Chloe Batie Yale University Colin Carlson Yale University Date Written: February 10, 2026 Abstract Science-and evidence-based decision-making are core values in global health, but in multilateral processes, they often take a backseat to politics. The Pandemic Agreement requires Parties to use "the best available science and evidence as the basis for public health decisions for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response," but is the treaty itself evidence-based? In this chapter, we trace how scientific and technical evidence were introduced into the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body. External experts were a key source of advice, especially on legal issues, but they were mostly excluded from the negotiations. Over time, Member States began to treat Relevant Stakeholders as a secondary source of technical expertise, introducing potential conflicts of interest into the process. In the end, scientists and stakeholders successfully leveraged scientific authority to facilitate the incorporation of One Health approach to pandemic prevention (Articles 4 and 5)-but otherwise, the treaty was shaped more by politics and pragmatism than by science. Moving forward, the Conference of Parties will be an opportunity for Member States to establish formal channels for scientific evidence synthesis and engagement-or to preserve a status quo that falls substantially behind evidence-based global governance in other areas. Keywords: Citation networks, evidence-based policy, One Health, Pandemic Agreement, scientometrics, World Health Organization

Figure 1. Evidence use in the WHO Pandemic Agreement negotiations: (A) by user type
and evidence type; and (B) by individual users and documents. Flows are proportional to
the number of instances. In panel B, shaded flows represent self-citations by individual
contributors (purple) or by organizations (red).

Figure 1. Evidence use in the WHO Pandemic Agreement negotiations: (A) by user type and evidence type; and (B) by individual users and documents. Flows are proportional to the number of instances. In panel B, shaded flows represent self-citations by individual contributors (purple) or by organizations (red).

Figure 2. Evidence use networks connecting documents (red) and users (blue). Edge width
and node size is proportional to the number of references made. For visual clarity, only the
most influential nodes are labeled. Layout is based on network connections and readability,
and does not necessarily reflect node properties (e.g., centrality).

Figure 2. Evidence use networks connecting documents (red) and users (blue). Edge width and node size is proportional to the number of references made. For visual clarity, only the most influential nodes are labeled. Layout is based on network connections and readability, and does not necessarily reflect node properties (e.g., centrality).

NEW‼️ For the forthcoming Pandemic Agreement travaux préparatoires edited by @alexandraphelan.bsky.social, we did a deep dive on how experts and evidence shaped the negotiations. What we found is a microcosm of global health: limited time, high stakes, and familiar shady actors like Big Pharma. (1/3)

12.02.2026 22:01 — 👍 52    🔁 14    💬 1    📌 2
Preview
This Is What It Looks Like When Nothing Matters Welcome to the internet’s nihilism crisis.

I wrote about something I've been thinking about for a long time. A kind of post-ironic collapse in our politics and culture where nihilism has become the lingua franca of the internet and beyond. It links Kirk, Clavicular, Epstein, memestock/coin stuff, mass shooters. I hope you'll read it.

14.02.2026 17:21 — 👍 1018    🔁 264    💬 38    📌 50

I've been asked about how to deal with the fear of speaking out. So, I wrote about it!

Fear and Fascism.

SUFS Blog: www.standupforscience.net/blog/fear-an...

Substack: open.substack.com/pub/sciencef...

@standupforscience.bsky.social #StandUpforScience

15.02.2026 13:51 — 👍 91    🔁 27    💬 4    📌 6
Preview
The billionaires' eugenics project: how Epstein infiltrated Harvard, muzzled the humanities and preached master-race science Edge - Jeffrey Epstein's favourite intellectual salon - was sold to me as a gathering of the world's finest minds, writes Virginia Heffernan. The files reveal it was something far darker: a decades-lo...

NEW: Read this terrific piece @virginiaheffernan.bsky.social for @thenerve.news in which she unpicks Edge.org, the hugely influential 'salon' funded by Epstein & threaded through with race science & eugenics.
1/

www.thenerve.news/p/epstein-bi...

15.02.2026 11:18 — 👍 1832    🔁 1041    💬 55    📌 125
Post image

My brother Garry has dementia and is currently lost somewhere in the Chester area. If anyone should spot him please call the police on 999. We'd appreciate reposts. @shitchester.bsky.social

14.02.2026 20:00 — 👍 486    🔁 1016    💬 36    📌 21
Credit: Fabrice Coffrini / AFP / Getty

Brazil's Lucas Pinheiro Braathen, center, winner of an alpine ski, men's giant slalom race, jumps in celebration on the podium flanked by second placed Switzerland's Marco Odermatt, left, and third placed Switzerland's Loic Meillard, at the 2026 Winter Olympics.(AP)

Credit: Fabrice Coffrini / AFP / Getty Brazil's Lucas Pinheiro Braathen, center, winner of an alpine ski, men's giant slalom race, jumps in celebration on the podium flanked by second placed Switzerland's Marco Odermatt, left, and third placed Switzerland's Loic Meillard, at the 2026 Winter Olympics.(AP)

What a great photo of Brazilian alpine skier Lucas Pinheiro Braathen, the first South American to ever win a medal at the Winter Olympic Games.

14.02.2026 21:06 — 👍 6826    🔁 1091    💬 63    📌 68

Too many people amassing astronomic wealth fundamentally do not believe in the idea that all people are equal and deserve equal rights, and they are spending their money on those ideas. This is the story.

13.02.2026 13:15 — 👍 148    🔁 78    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

My Cartoon for Thursday's Toronto Star

11.02.2026 21:09 — 👍 550    🔁 178    💬 21    📌 21

I have plenty of reservations about the reliability of funnel-plots and z-curves and such, as well as their interpretation.....

But holy shit look at that.

10.02.2026 15:17 — 👍 45    🔁 16    💬 7    📌 1

"Overall, broad claims of generalized learning gains resulting from AI/LLMs appear premature; the current evidence is insufficient to support robust policy or practice recommendations."

10.02.2026 16:01 — 👍 5    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

Everyone should go read "More Work for Mother," by Ruth Schwartz Cowan.

10.02.2026 14:43 — 👍 26    🔁 10    💬 1    📌 0
Preview
a close up of a woman 's face with a disney logo on the bottom right Alt: Woman winking

"Find lost dogs with Ring's new Search Party" is the tag line they're using.

"Lost dogs"

09.02.2026 02:33 — 👍 347    🔁 63    💬 9    📌 1

Maybe it wasn’t… i don’t know

09.02.2026 01:53 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

Bad Bunny “together we are America”

09.02.2026 01:35 — 👍 11083    🔁 2221    💬 88    📌 159

But what was written on the football?

09.02.2026 01:43 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

I was saying to my kids “well done” when the prop tv was showing the Grammy’s speech and then I said “oh… superb master of all well dones!!!”

09.02.2026 01:42 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Statler and Waldorf have more of a comment than a question

07.02.2026 15:00 — 👍 368    🔁 65    💬 12    📌 1

As someone very wise once told me: you have no idea who people really are. And what they’ll confess privately. To lawyers, therapists, and their enablers.

She also said the partner of a monster is there to bask in the thrill and help burry the corpses. They don’t leave because they are in it.

07.02.2026 04:22 — 👍 23    🔁 7    💬 2    📌 0

@dgbassani is following 20 prominent accounts