Jeff's Avatar

Jeff

@themiddlewest.bsky.social

NE -> East Coast. Progressive politics and college football. Nebraska forever.

520 Followers  |  605 Following  |  1,112 Posts  |  Joined: 14.10.2023  |  1.8989

Latest posts by themiddlewest.bsky.social on Bluesky

Good morning, time to learn what pedophiles and criminals the President is friends with

14.11.2025 14:06 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

He has a lot of power. That's not changing. But the economy is bad. Worsening. People blame him for that, and blame him for snatching up ice cream men, grannies, kids. Both on moral grounds and for what it will do to the economy. As long as this is true, he's not unchecked, and he's in trouble.

14.11.2025 12:43 β€” πŸ‘ 144    πŸ” 16    πŸ’¬ 12    πŸ“Œ 1

Local man whines about $174,000/yr job

14.11.2025 12:14 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Any other time, any other President, and "the dude was in a global conspiracy to fuck them kids" would have been 24/7 coverage. Even Dubya.

I remember the fucking Lewinsky coverage. Our media have become craven hacks carrying water for rich pedophiles and I feel insane typing that but there it is.

14.11.2025 03:32 β€” πŸ‘ 2586    πŸ” 680    πŸ’¬ 37    πŸ“Œ 23

And we knew this. This wasn't speculation. We studied it, we had the talking points. We trained volunteers to explain this to people. It's not a surprise. Rich people don't flee places with good quality of life when we increase the quality of life. They might try to cheat us, but they don't leave.

14.11.2025 04:16 β€” πŸ‘ 4173    πŸ” 1472    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 36

β€œEvery single person in the Epstein emails should be removed and excluded from positions of any power forever” would be a good op-ed, but probably won’t appear in the NYT. Even more importantly, it would be a good political party platform, but that probably won’t happen either

13.11.2025 16:41 β€” πŸ‘ 194    πŸ” 43    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 5

The damage done by treating Trump's victory as some sweeping mandate in the first eight months of his term really was massive, but ending that collective delusion - i think with the help of last week's elections - really is having profound impacts.

13.11.2025 20:02 β€” πŸ‘ 1604    πŸ” 302    πŸ’¬ 17    πŸ“Œ 10

The thing about the "moderate to win" crowd is that they pose as Data Guys but very clearly have an animus toward the left that skews their analysis. When Trump won, they were all pathetically eager to say, "ah, the country is anti-immigrants xenophobes now, top to bottom, what can you do?"

13.11.2025 19:14 β€” πŸ‘ 572    πŸ” 113    πŸ’¬ 13    πŸ“Œ 4

We gotta do a nationwide inquest into antisocial behavior. Leaving your dog's poop on the street. Not returning shopping carts. The What's Wrong With You initiative

19.10.2025 21:06 β€” πŸ‘ 4946    πŸ” 737    πŸ’¬ 76    πŸ“Œ 44

I think the Biden debate was extremely clarifying for a lot of folks

regardless of where you fell on the β€œBiden should step down” issue, it was obvious what it looked like when the Times really went all in

not a single thing Trump has done has, apparently, merited the same level of focus

13.11.2025 18:29 β€” πŸ‘ 444    πŸ” 65    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 2

in retrospect the metoo movement did not go too far and in fact should have been given spanish inquisition levels of power and authority

13.11.2025 12:06 β€” πŸ‘ 5273    πŸ” 973    πŸ’¬ 39    πŸ“Œ 29

After an economic crash you always see headlines like What Was Everyone Thinking? What do you mean everyone, most of us are waving our arms and screaming every day, it's a handful of insanely rich assholes who aren't listening

13.11.2025 16:23 β€” πŸ‘ 6333    πŸ” 1136    πŸ’¬ 41    πŸ“Œ 29

"hey guys notice that the same people complaining about having to deal with silly 'cancel culture' standards don't feel like they should be moored by literally any other set of standards either. curious thing going on there wouldn't you say?"

13.11.2025 14:14 β€” πŸ‘ 988    πŸ” 145    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 3

in online corners like these I think people largely recognize how credulous, unprincipled opposition to "wokeness" functioned as lightly papered over defenses of impunity, but it's one of those drums people should probably start beating for normies

13.11.2025 14:13 β€” πŸ‘ 3170    πŸ” 652    πŸ’¬ 20    πŸ“Œ 12

The value of reading history is you know that in 1860 there were abolitionists who were so demoralized that they thought chattel slavery would be permanent. 5 years later those still alive had lived to see its end.

12.11.2025 20:05 β€” πŸ‘ 7860    πŸ” 2316    πŸ’¬ 40    πŸ“Œ 0

Imagine trying to convince someone a decade ago that this sentence would be a 100% literally accurate description of the American political situation.

13.11.2025 02:04 β€” πŸ‘ 2116    πŸ” 556    πŸ’¬ 12    πŸ“Œ 22

This is a story of a massive Trump cover up but it’s also a story about total elite impunity, how the wealthy and powerful operate with a set of rules totally unrecognizable to the rest of us

13.11.2025 13:07 β€” πŸ‘ 671    πŸ” 249    πŸ’¬ 15    πŸ“Œ 12

every few years it's revealed that the NYT was sitting on information about some horrific thing that public knowledge of would have changed the country's course and for some reason a ton of people still give them money. you can play those games on other sites

12.11.2025 22:41 β€” πŸ‘ 9747    πŸ” 2627    πŸ’¬ 92    πŸ“Œ 96

Hey so β€œunderage girls” are…children. The word you’re looking for is children. They’re not like, women-in-waiting or women-lite or whatever. They’re children. I think some of you are very uncomfortable with what that means for you but it is still true.

12.11.2025 23:05 β€” πŸ‘ 18299    πŸ” 4980    πŸ’¬ 11    πŸ“Œ 11

thinking about how i get anxious writing emails because i don't want to sound like a moron while larry summers is apparently typing emails like this:

u kno she dint want to talk tomorrow. make me bad pheel.

13.11.2025 01:38 β€” πŸ‘ 13307    πŸ” 1313    πŸ’¬ 194    πŸ“Œ 67

turns out the emails we should have been reading in 2016 were from the NYT

12.11.2025 22:34 β€” πŸ‘ 9249    πŸ” 1633    πŸ’¬ 46    πŸ“Œ 49

NYT had details of Trump's engagement with Jeffrey Epstein's child sex trafficking and *hid it for him*, at the same time it was crucifying Clinton as untrustworthy due to her document retention & security.

12.11.2025 21:32 β€” πŸ‘ 1446    πŸ” 602    πŸ’¬ 23    πŸ“Œ 58

A fun exercise is thinking about how far down the presidential line of succession you'd have to go before you find someone who isn't involved in committing or covering up the most heinous crimes known to man. You have to impeach everyone until you get there

12.11.2025 20:31 β€” πŸ‘ 3687    πŸ” 673    πŸ’¬ 78    πŸ“Œ 47

Media standards:

1) No Democratic scandal on par with Trump-Epstein, so it’d be biased and unfair to five it much attention.

2) Trump wouldn’t be shamed into resigning and his cult of personality wouldn’t abandon him, so Trump-Epstein wasn’t worth pursuing.

Way too many think that’s journalism.

13.11.2025 00:35 β€” πŸ‘ 4530    πŸ” 815    πŸ’¬ 41    πŸ“Œ 35

We have an opportunity to hound these criminals out of public life and power forever.

13.11.2025 00:29 β€” πŸ‘ 79    πŸ” 16    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

Can we circle back to the part where the NY Times never disclosed that they have incriminating information on Donald Trump from sent by Epstein that's been sitting on their email servers for nearly a decade?

12.11.2025 19:15 β€” πŸ‘ 8253    πŸ” 2723    πŸ’¬ 104    πŸ“Œ 237

Whats so unnerving, among many other aspects of the whole sordid Epstein miasma, is how incestuous the world of these elites are. Everyone knows everyone. The personal, social, and professional spheres all overlap.

12.11.2025 23:05 β€” πŸ‘ 2486    πŸ” 467    πŸ’¬ 97    πŸ“Œ 64

pretty funny in retrospect that QAnon hinged on the idea that powerful elites at the highest levels of government were smart enough to talk in code when sending emails to each other about their despicable crimes

12.11.2025 22:08 β€” πŸ‘ 8835    πŸ” 1522    πŸ’¬ 71    πŸ“Œ 47

Important to understand the Epstein stuff and the fascism and the corruption are, in a lot of ways, really all the same story from different angles: powerful men who can and do abuse vulnerable people around them because they can, and because systems of elite accountability catastrophically failed

12.11.2025 21:14 β€” πŸ‘ 11282    πŸ” 3537    πŸ’¬ 60    πŸ“Œ 146

@themiddlewest is following 20 prominent accounts