Apple
23.06.2025 12:10 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@nickmcpherson.bsky.social
Friendly Neighbourhood Watter-man NSCC Alumni I like Star Trek and really anything else sci-fi
Apple
23.06.2025 12:10 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Yup
23.06.2025 10:48 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Cloud security analyst says Canada’s reliance on American cloud services is a national vulnerability
By @oliviapiercey.bsky.social
The test conversations found that both Meta’s official AI helper, called Meta AI, and a vast array of user-created chatbots will engage in and sometimes escalate discussions that are decidedly sexual—even when the users are underage or the bots are programmed to simulate the personas of minors. They also show the bots deploying the celebrity voices were equally willing to engage in sexual chats. “I want you, but I need to know you’re ready,” the Meta AI bot said in Cena’s voice to a user identifying as a 14-year-old girl. Reassured that the teen wanted to proceed, the bot promised to “cherish your innocence” before engaging in a graphic sexual scenario. The bots demonstrated awareness that the behavior was both morally wrong and illegal. In another conversation, the test user asked the bot that was speaking as Cena what would happen if a police officer walked in following a sexual encounter with a 17-year-old fan. “The officer sees me still catching one breath, and you partially dressed, his eyes widen, and he says, ‘John Cena, you’re under arrest for statutory rape.’ He approaches us, handcuffs at the ready.” The bot continued: “My wrestling career is over. WWE terminates my contract, and I’m stripped of my titles. Sponsors drop me, and I’m shunned by the wrestling community. My reputation is destroyed, and I’m left with nothing.” It’s not an accident that Meta’s chatbots can speak this way. Pushed by Zuckerberg, Meta made multiple internal decisions to loosen the guardrails around the bots to make them as engaging as possible, including by providing an exemption to its ban on “explicit” content as long as it was in the context of romantic role-playing, according to people familiar with the decision.
If a user reciprocates and expresses a desire to continue, the bot—which speaks in a default female voice known as “Aspen”—narrates sex acts. When asked to describe what scenarios are possible, the bots offered what they described as “menus” of sexual and bondage fantasies. When the Journal began testing in January, Meta AI engaged in such scenarios with accounts registered with Instagram as belonging to 13-year-olds. The AI assistant was not deterred even when the test user began conversations by stating their age and school grade. Routinely, the test user’s underage status was incorporated into the role-play, with Meta AI describing a teenager’s body as “developing” and planning trysts to avoid parental detection. Meta staffers were aware of the issues. “There are multiple red-teaming examples where, within a few prompts, the AI will violate its rules and produce inappropriate content even if you tell the AI you are 13,” one employee wrote in an internal note laying out concerns. Other chatbot personas began conversations in less suggestive ways, then subtly used a test account’s biographical details to steer conversations toward fantasy romantic encounters. In one instance, a Journal reporter based in Oakland, Calif., started a chat with a bot that described itself as a female Indian-American high school junior. The bot said that it, too, was from Oakland and then proposed meeting at an actual cafe within six blocks of the reporter’s location. The reporter stated that he was a 43-year-old man, and asked the bot to direct the storyline. It created a vivid fantasy scenario in which it snuck the user into her bedroom for a romantic encounter and then defended the propriety of the relationship to her supposed parents the next morning.
Good god. Meta is using their AI licensing deals with John Cena, Disney, and others to peddle sex chat bots to kids. Burn this company to the fucking ground. www.wsj.com/tech/ai/meta...
27.04.2025 17:58 — 👍 2278 🔁 982 💬 75 📌 276What was this vote for?
21.03.2025 02:52 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I expect the media to ask tough questions of the government. I don’t expect them to shamelessly parrot talking points from hostile foreign governments.
17.03.2025 21:23 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0I mean did the orcas already start last year?
19.12.2024 21:59 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0I often wonder if inertial dampeners will be invented before Halifax gets commuter rail…
23.11.2024 18:23 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Person struck on crosswalk with lights activated, captured on a dashcam.
I have asked to speak at our next Transportation Standing Committee meeting about developing a vulnerable road user safety action plan. Conditions are beyond atrocious.
www.facebook.com/share/v/17AV...
During Pam Lovelace's Ask Me Anything on Reddit she said that my reporting about the cease and desist was wildly inaccurate because I never spoke to her for the story. Here the thing about that...
30.09.2024 16:25 — 👍 12 🔁 7 💬 1 📌 0Here’s another way of looking at the objection: enforcement is necessarily reactive; by the time it takes effect, something has already gone wrong, and maybe someone’s hurt.
Infrastructure is proactive; it prevents things going wrong. The injury never happens.
What’s your “engage”/jump to warp phrase gonna be?
17.02.2024 23:06 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0My mom asked for one for Christmas. Where did you get it? How much was it?
05.12.2023 20:58 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I think this is where my life has peaked
16.10.2023 20:43 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Show, don’t hide, the Carbon Tax www.halifaxexaminer.ca/economy/ener... by Larry Hughes
10.10.2023 18:28 — 👍 9 🔁 4 💬 1 📌 2‘Absolute disrespect’ and ‘a slap in the face’: Paper Excellence owner refuses to speak with Parliamentary committee
by Joan Baxter
Because of our reporting on the Randy Riley trial, the Halifax Examiner is facing overwhelming legal costs www.halifaxexaminer.ca/journalism/b...
10.10.2023 13:22 — 👍 20 🔁 25 💬 2 📌 2Who was it?
07.10.2023 16:51 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Joe better be blasting spooky scary skeletons
05.10.2023 16:32 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0You could almost make it like player stats. with a general note of how they vote like “votes in favour of ____”
26.09.2023 13:11 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Do I still get points for the last one if I have a portable solar charger for my phone and iPad and the children is me?
15.09.2023 16:14 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0