Scott Product

Big day for Graham today!

And it should be fine as long as…

Great glinner insights here from Tadhg Hickey c/o the Alexei Sayle podcast

c/o c&b

Yep, and at the same as doubling down on the defamation of Paisley.

I’m sure his solicitors are super happy about all of this

It’s amazing, the worst people always turn out to be the worse people

Racist tweets trigger warning "How about we kick the monkeys out of our countries" "Oh? How many blacks has he deported" "No we need zero blacks."

Keira Bell is the "gender critical" movements celebrity detransitioner, and is currently spearheading a legal challenge to trans healthcare, and this is the horrendously racist shit she has been retweeting.

This should be enough for the mainstream not to platform her. She's obviously a hatemonger.

He’s threatening to release a “400 page dossier” he and others have compiled on the individual.

Which is an amazing considering he’s in the middle of legal action and trying to defend himself against accusations of online harassment

You act like you're surprised :D

Kind of like the Nazi’s rejecting special and general relativity because it was Jüdische Physik”

Joey Barton to pay an extra £35,000 to Jeremy Vine The ex-footballer had already agreed to pay £75,000 over a series of defamatory social media posts.

This is just republishing some of the original claims, isn't it?

That cost Barton a LOT of money. He paid £75k + legal costs and apologised for the initial defamation and subsequently had to pay another £35k for repeating after Vine too legal action

www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...

Glinner's barrister is estimating 18 months

It's weird that he'd say calling someone a nonce is a triviality (ask Joey Barton or Lozza Fox), especially given his legal team vigorously fought against it being defamatory.

So there are a lot of steps remaining, and some of what I've said is almost definitely incomplete or wrong because I'm not a lawyer

Glinner's will have to submit another defence taking into account the prelim issues rulings. After that, there'll be further disclosure of documents and evidence, exchange of witness statements and pre-trial reviews to ensure all issues have been identified and narrowed.

It looks like preliminary issues are settled now.

The judge has asked the parties to agree on a timetable for written submissions on who bears costs for the preliminary issues trials. He said he suspects this will lead to another hearing

Don't forget his essential work on PUMP DEPOUNDING

What the what now? Is this verifiably true?

And so everyone is clear, these are the 11 defamatory statements and their meaning that Graham must defend.

Underlined text is deemed a statement of opinion, while the rest are statements of fact.

Hey David! Congratulations on this and the previous win. It's incredible how much court time was spent deciding whether "nonce" was defamatory.

I hope he's held to account for his actions in court, and if the only way forward is a settlement, it's accompanied by a full apology for his actions.

Three years ago, Judith Butler predicted in a Guardian interview that “gender-critical” feminists would not be part of the fight against fascism. This caused a massive “GC” backlash, prompting The Guardian to censor the interview. And yet here they now are, definitively proving Butler correct.

hey Graham, do you have a court date for your defamation trial?

Irrespective of who wins it’ll be amazing seeing your incredibly poor behaviour pored over for everyone to see in excruciating detail. Are you planning on giving evidence?

I can't get on with Frank Herbert's Dune series, I read the first one and didn't get anything of value from it. Love the Villneuve films and even the David Lynch interpretation (to an extent) but it just seemed like schlocky sci-fi. I think this is a me problem :D

I'm looking forward to the frustration this ding dong will experience as it becomes clear how little authority the head of an advisory commitee to the executive has.

And how little power the executive has over the budget.

It'll be the most entertaining civics lesson of all time

It looks like an unlimited company has more control over company valuation for the IHT calculation of passing on the company membership than a company limited by share capital.

It's the same tactic the Brexit-backing billionaires and Tory donors, the Bamford Bros, use with JCB.

They're currently under investigation by HMRC and facing a potential tax bill of £500m. I'm hoping an unlimited company, at best, delays scrutiny rather than escapes it. We'll see

“you have to”

Oh no, am I going to be arrested?

lol, why would your answer to everything be “I’M NOT SAYING ITS NONCES, BUT ITS NONCES”

It’s a really weird preoccupation to have.

Have a word with yourself

Why would a teen be concerned about their sexuality?

Fucking ada

You know if a kid asked a teacher if it was normal to be gay the teacher was free to say it was abnormal but proscribed from saying it was normal.

Why would you ever draft a law like that?

You know the problem with s28 wasn’t the law or its enforcement but the normalisation of the idea that gay or lesbian relationships were degenerate.

And it sounds like you’d be happier if it hadn’t been repealed