Fathom Deep's Avatar

Fathom Deep

@fathomdeep.bsky.social

"The soul becomes dyed with the colour of its thoughts"

516 Followers  |  1,035 Following  |  4,583 Posts  |  Joined: 15.11.2024  |  2.8243

Latest posts by fathomdeep.bsky.social on Bluesky

I have a somewhat adventurous Parisian friend. She once told me she drove into the city to attend an orgy, and that the biggest orgasm of the night was when she found a parking space immediately outside.

15.10.2025 16:14 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Grow up.

15.10.2025 15:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Paris has become one of the most appealing cities in Europe thanks to Anne Hildago's campaign to green-up and clean-up the streets.

This article is a load of shite.

15.10.2025 09:39 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Brave move, well done!

15.10.2025 05:19 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

And a lot is.

Then there's all the arable land currently used to raise food for cattle.

15.10.2025 04:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I believe I've read that small mixed organic farms can be more productive per mΒ² than large industrial ones, but that they require many more workers so are impractical in the modern economy. Is that fair to say?

14.10.2025 12:54 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Get rid of animal agriculture and we'd have land for food production and rewilding too.

14.10.2025 12:36 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

They do make me laugh...

14.10.2025 10:09 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Okay, that explains where I've been going wrong.

14.10.2025 08:32 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Selling commercial property isn't all that easy at the moment, not many buyers around. The tenants might have a chance if they can put in their own offer...

13.10.2025 19:30 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Oh my. If this is your kink then shopping in Paris would rock your world.

13.10.2025 19:19 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Women met peacefully to discuss issues including VAWG. Some (obviously male) trans activists smashed up the venue as an act of intimidation.

You're showing solidarity with the oppressors.

13.10.2025 19:07 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

And the Tories got 42.3%.

13.10.2025 18:46 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Do you think Polanski will get that many votes? Or is it more likely he'll split the left and give Reform an easy victory?

13.10.2025 18:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The reason the GP is overwhelmingly pro-trans is that it has purged every gender critical and feminist viewpoint.

13.10.2025 18:36 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

They're porcelain mushrooms, I think.

12.10.2025 08:09 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Lots of Jewish immigrants changed their family names to appear 'less Jewish' in an unfriendly world. My own ancestors included.

11.10.2025 16:10 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Which is a shame, I must say, because I otherwise like Polanski's recent energy.

11.10.2025 15:17 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The GP's position on trans issues (essentially the only party still willingly talking about it) will make them popular with some, but unelectable to others.

My own experience is that the party is riddled with a certain kind of smug misogyny.

11.10.2025 15:16 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

They use the tails from real mice.

11.10.2025 14:18 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

HRH King Charles has entered the chat.

11.10.2025 14:17 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

That's glorious. Amazing how spacious an interior can be when you dont have to worry about pesky crumple zones and air bags.

11.10.2025 07:07 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Oh Matt, you should've cancelled the direct debit the moment the last bill was paid! The useless buggers cant be trusted.

10.10.2025 15:07 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I'd really consider voting Green if it wasn't for this homophobic nonsense.

10.10.2025 15:04 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Lol

10.10.2025 14:48 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Great question. Nick Cave maybe? Steve McQueen? Bowie? Keanu? Lol.

The fact that they're all only 'maybes' says a lot.

10.10.2025 14:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Preach.

10.10.2025 14:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You are literally proving him right.

10.10.2025 05:53 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Maybe we're still at cross purposes... sorry, it's been a long day πŸ˜…

09.10.2025 15:58 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Oh... I think I understood your meaning? My point is that X has quite likely defamed the black guy in the photo, which is illegal. He could sue them for using his image in this way... perhaps even if it was an honest mistake (as they have a duty to check facts).

09.10.2025 15:57 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

@fathomdeep is following 20 prominent accounts