Past Me Dev's Avatar

Past Me Dev

@developerpast.bsky.social

41 Followers  |  88 Following  |  170 Posts  |  Joined: 21.02.2025  |  1.8813

Latest posts by developerpast.bsky.social on Bluesky

I'm missing Honolulu, San Diego, and, oddly, Seattle.

26.10.2025 18:50 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

35.

26.10.2025 09:28 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

15+17=2*16. 13+19=2*16. 4*16=64

21.10.2025 02:23 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

So, you don't actually know what the principle of fulfillment actually says, do you? Glad we could clear up that you are full of shit.

21.10.2025 01:52 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

You should go read it, and see how it explicitly rejects Christian fulfillment doctrine.

'We hold the Jewish people in special regard because their covenant with God has never been revoked, for "the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable"'

21.10.2025 01:48 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It really, really is not. See, frex, Pope Francis' Evangelii Gaudium from 2013.

21.10.2025 01:42 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

So, you are seriously claiming that the Catholic tradition and, say, the Baptist tradition are congruent? That their understanding of what it means to be "Christian" are identical?

21.10.2025 01:37 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
a cartoon man says that 's the neat thing in front of stairs ALT: a cartoon man says that 's the neat thing in front of stairs

You could try answering the question asked instead.

20.10.2025 23:47 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Unless you are La Croix, a picture of a thing is not viewed as equivalent to the thing. The "filled with courage and integrity" referred to the members deciding, not the photos.

10.10.2025 13:55 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Donald Knuth didn't take a sabbatical to create TeX for nothing. Stop using XML for typesetting!

01.10.2025 01:49 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
GCD :: Cover :: Adventure Comics #389

It's Adventure Comics #389, Mr. Collector.

www.comics.org/issue/23303/...

27.09.2025 22:56 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

Same, and then it came back at half-strength when they upped my dose. Luckily it is fading much quicker this time.

26.09.2025 12:22 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Right there with you. These are magic, as far as I can tell.

26.09.2025 09:46 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Witty. Pithy. Good with a link.

19.09.2025 23:27 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

You have it entirely backwards. They aren't looking at anybody in particular, they are seeking suspects. When you hand then a list of 10000 suspects, they will start with them. Without that, they have to investigate the scene and cast the net as wide as possible. Why make it easy for them?

19.09.2025 15:40 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Winnowing the potential set of folks from "any one of the 340 million people in the USA" to "any of these 10000 folks" is quite literally doing their job for them. Don't do that. 2/2

19.09.2025 15:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

You have absolutely no idea what data sets the police have access to. Doing a first pass over that list to obtain information about the car they drive, any warrants they have, and what demographics the police know about them is a sub-second search. Doing a LPR search is another brief lookup. 1/

19.09.2025 15:34 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Wut?

Tens of thousands of names is a *tiny* data set. You have literally no idea what you are talking about.

19.09.2025 15:19 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

The fact that you confuse pseudonymity for anonymity really hurts your credibility here. They are not the same thing, not even close.

You're also flatly wrong in your assertions here and upthread but frankly I'm past the point of caring. You're a buffoon. Ta ta.

18.09.2025 11:40 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You consistently misunderstand, and have crossed the line into being an ass, so let me spell it out in words of as few syllables as possible so you might finally understand:

I. Do. Not. Care. What. They. Want.

Protest. Is. Not. The. Place. To. Ask. Me. To. Join. Their. Org.

Fuck. Their. Cult.

17.09.2025 23:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Look, if you're going to go full Sephiroth on us, we're going to mock you. It's pure reflex. You earned this all by your lonesome.

17.09.2025 21:30 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Anonymous would be the modern one that springs to mind.

French resistance to the occupation in WWII is an older one.

Pretty much any cell-based resistance or revolutionary movement is going to be allergic to recordkeeping.

17.09.2025 20:40 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Think of it as Pascal's Wager, but for fascism. I can sign or not sign. The government can grab that info, or not. The only bad outcome for me is sign/grab, so by not signing, I guarantee avoiding that outcome.

I'm still going to go protest, though, because signing up has NOTHING to do with that.

17.09.2025 19:22 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The most effective defense we have right now is this administration's incompetence, and you are advocating for *doing their job for them*.

Making it orders of magnitude easier to identify opponents of this administration makes it take orders of magnitude less manpower to accomplish the same work.

17.09.2025 19:02 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Truly ironic that he pops off about cowardice when he blocked me for asking questions.

17.09.2025 17:30 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Why does a protest need organizers?

17.09.2025 16:26 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Oh, so now you're just lying about this?

"Don't register for the protest" is nowhere near "don't get involved" and you know it. Guess I'll just remove all assumptions you are acting in good faith.

17.09.2025 16:26 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

So why is organizing a protest so important if I can just show up to do so?

17.09.2025 16:23 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Kinda ironic for you to call this cowardice when you duck all the questions thrown your way.

17.09.2025 16:23 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Why not? Why do they need contact info for me if I just decide to show up and protest?

I see you assert this a lot, but you offer no evidence, and I'd really like you to give some.

17.09.2025 16:22 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@developerpast is following 20 prominent accounts