Loved giving a talk at the Biophysical Society Meeting @biophysicalsoc.bsky.social in the Motility & Cytoskeleton Subgroup Symposium. Thanks to Katya Grishchuk for the invite! So good to be in San Francisco again and catch up with everyone!
27.02.2026 20:21 —
👍 12
🔁 2
💬 0
📌 0
Mitosis lovers, get ready for Dubrovnik! 🔬🎉
I’m super excited to be organizing the 4th Mitotic Spindle Conference with Nenad Pavin, and we can’t wait to see you there!
Want your abstract to be selected for a talk? Submit by Feb 8!
www.phy.pmf.unizg.hr/~mitosis/
#SpindleCroatia2026
02.02.2026 08:22 —
👍 28
🔁 15
💬 1
📌 0
PhD position in my lab!
28.01.2026 17:25 —
👍 40
🔁 36
💬 1
📌 0
Thanks, @focalplane.bsky.social!
21.01.2026 13:50 —
👍 4
🔁 1
💬 1
📌 0
Reappraisal of motor protein CENPE's role in bringing chromosomes together in preparation for accurate cell division
📷 @krunovuk.bsky.social & @ivatolic.bsky.social @institutrb.bsky.social in @natcomms.nature.com
➡️ bpod.org.uk/archive/2025... with
John Ankers
12.12.2025 10:35 —
👍 3
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
Researchers in Croatia, join us tomorrow at 9:30 in Zagreb or online to explore ERC grants! I’ll be sharing my experience from both sides of the table - as an ERC panel member and a grantee (Consolidator + Synergy). Bring your questions! @erc.europa.eu
link.europa.eu/dXQmbr
09.12.2025 18:56 —
👍 2
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
Do people outside academia understand the potential of EU basic research? I’ll be speaking in Session 2 “Let’s Pop The Balloon” at Zagreb Science Communication Forum 2025, on stepping outside the research bubble and reaching wider publics. scicommforum.eu
01.12.2025 19:35 —
👍 4
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
When our institute’s legendary PR team tells our science story 🤩 @krunovuk.bsky.social @erc.europa.eu
www.nature.com/articles/s41... www.nature.com/articles/s41...
25.11.2025 15:20 —
👍 7
🔁 2
💬 0
📌 0
A golden Zagreb morning before work
31.10.2025 20:47 —
👍 14
🔁 2
💬 0
📌 0
Congrats @krunovuk.bsky.social on this remarkable work! Thanks @erc.europa.eu, www.hrzz.hr, and www.srce.unizg.hr for supporting us!
29.10.2025 17:08 —
👍 4
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
We propose a kinetochore-centrosome feedback mechanism controlling chromosome movement: chromosomes near centrosomes rely on CENP-E because high Aurora A activity boosts Aurora B at kinetochores, restricting end-on attachments. CENP-E counteracts this by downregulating Aurora B.
29.10.2025 17:08 —
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Notably, the dependence of polar chromosomes on CENP-E can be bypassed by using constitutively dephosphorylated Hec1, emphasizing the role of Aurora kinase-mediated Hec1 phosphorylation in preventing congression when CENP-E is absent.
29.10.2025 17:08 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Does Aurora A at spindle poles directly promote Aurora B activity at kinetochores? Yes, our results show that acute inhibition of Aurora A reduces Aurora B activity at polar kinetochores, accompanied by a decrease in the number of polar chromosomes.
29.10.2025 17:08 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
At poles that contain centrioles, high Aurora A kinase enhances Aurora B activity on kinetochores of polar chromosomes, increasing phosphorylation of microtubule-binding proteins and preventing stable microtubule attachments in the absence of CENP-E.
29.10.2025 17:08 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Centrosomes inhibit the initiation of congression in the absence of CENP-E, and depletion of centrioles allows chromosomes near acentriolar poles to initiate congression independently of CENP-E.
29.10.2025 17:08 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
In our second paper, we asked why only polar chromosomes depend on CENP-E for congression. We inhibited Plk4 to generate spindles where one pole had centrioles and the other did not. Strikingly, the acentriolar pole (on the right in the movie) rarely had polar chromosomes.
29.10.2025 17:08 —
👍 1
🔁 1
💬 1
📌 0
And now… part two of our twin papers on how chromosomes find their place before division! Led by @krunovuk.bsky.social at @institutrb.bsky.social, out in @natcomms.nature.com!
doi.org/10.1038/s414...
doi.org/10.1038/s414...
Missed the thread on the first paper? Catch up:
bsky.app/profile/ivat...
29.10.2025 17:08 —
👍 27
🔁 6
💬 1
📌 0
In sum, the first paper shows that chromosome congression is coupled with biorientation, with CENP-E linking the two. A thread on the second paper is coming soon! Congrats @krunovuk.bsky.social on this amazing work! We appreciate support from @erc.europa.eu, www.hrzz.hr, and www.srce.unizg.hr.
21.10.2025 11:13 —
👍 7
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
We propose that congression operates as a negative feedback loop between the activity of Aurora kinases that oppose congression by destabilizing end-on attachments, but also activate CENP-E, which then promotes congression by opposing the activity of Aurora kinases.
21.10.2025 11:13 —
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
In our model, stabilization of end-on attachments without CENP-E is delayed due to Aurora kinase-mediated phosphorylation of microtubule-binding proteins and expansion of the fibrous corona, which obstructs attachments. CENP-E counters this by reducing phosphorylation.
21.10.2025 11:13 —
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Why can’t kinetochores start their movement without CENP-E? Is dynein holding them? No. This is due to Aurora kinases that oppose the formation of end-on attachments near the spindle poles. When Aurora B is inhibited in the absence of CENP-E, kinetochores start to move!
21.10.2025 11:13 —
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
To directly test if congression is coupled with biorientation, we performed STED super-resolution imaging. Indeed, reactivation of CENP-E led to a gradual transition from lateral to end-on attachments on polar chromosomes.
21.10.2025 11:13 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Chromosome congression involves progressive capture and stabilization of end-on microtubule attachments, based on recruitment of the attachment marker Astrin, together with a gradual reduction of SAC and fibrous corona proteins on kinetochores.
21.10.2025 11:13 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
We found that without CENP-E kinetochores move in the same manner as normally, just not as frequently. Thus, CENP-E is not required for chromosome movement during congression, challenging the current view, but instead for the initiation of this movement.
21.10.2025 11:13 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
@krunovuk.bsky.social pushed the limits of long-term live-cell imaging by simultaneously imaging hundreds of cells for 24 h using lattice light-sheet microscopy. By adding chemical inhibitors, he tested a time-resolved hierarchy of molecular networks working during congression.
21.10.2025 11:13 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Do you know how chromosomes travel to the spindle midplane in mitosis? The motor protein CENP-E is crucial for this. Without it, some chromosomes stay trapped at the poles. The current model says it glides kinetochores along microtubules... but does it really?
21.10.2025 11:13 —
👍 4
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Two back-to-back stories on mitosis led by my incredible postdoc @krunovuk.bsky.social at @institutrb.bsky.social, in which we challenge the gliding model of CENP-E-driven chromosome congression! Today in @natcomms.nature.com
doi.org/10.1038/s414...
doi.org/10.1038/s414...
21.10.2025 11:13 —
👍 76
🔁 26
💬 2
📌 4
#Mifobio2025
Focus on the module 5:
👉 Physical measurements, control and handling -Mechanobiology
We are delighted to welcome Professor @ivatolic.bsky.social
Ruđer Bošković Institute
Lecture : “Mechanobiology of the Mitotic Spindle”
👉 imabio-cnrs.fr
#GDRimabio #microscopy #biological_imaging
05.10.2025 15:58 —
👍 18
🔁 8
💬 2
📌 1