Stacy Frederick's Avatar

Stacy Frederick

@sfederick.bsky.social

Science Defender Incognito Virologist tired of X_Hate

107 Followers  |  232 Following  |  289 Posts  |  Joined: 08.09.2024  |  2.156

Latest posts by sfederick.bsky.social on Bluesky

Preview
Judges Keep Questioning Herd Immunity Advocate’s Credibility "At this stage of the proceedings, the Court is simply unwilling to trust Dr. Bhattacharya."

www.importantcontext.news/p/judges-kee...

04.08.2025 13:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
NIH director Bhattacharya denies banned word list in meeting with staffers Bethesda Declaration signers insist that a list exists and further criticize new policies

Despite meeting with the Bethesda Declaration signers, Jay continues to repeat lies and disinformation.

These lies include:

NIH is not censoring grants based on keywords. cen.acs.org/policy/resea...

03.08.2025 02:29 β€” πŸ‘ 69    πŸ” 28    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 4

Would refuting even matter? We ain't changing minds at this point. Regardless, it wasn't published till the vaccine brought IFR down almost as low as they claimed. But remember, he used the pre-print to promote the GBD in early 2020.

03.08.2025 01:57 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Redirecting

True. The issue is that he conducts research of a similar nature to that of the Virologists he demonizes. This study, for example, could be misinterpreted as a "blueprint" to make super-deadly TB, just like he attacks @peterdaszak.bsky.social's work.
doi.org/10.1016/j.mo...

02.08.2025 22:43 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Remember the DEFUSE reviewers basically said, "Hey, this could be a weapon," but "no thanks." Why wouldn't an organization with unlimited resources, to which everyone swears allegiance and secrecy, make the weapon themselves? Why involve NIH civilians?

02.08.2025 21:44 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It would be helpful if you could also doggedly pursue the agency that reviewed DEFUSE. Your "blueprint" was provided to the US Army (not the NIH). Then "the China virus" appeared a few years later. When will Jay reveal exactly how and why NIH stole and secretly funded a DOD application?

02.08.2025 21:34 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

Federal agencies hiding out in a bunker

31.07.2025 23:46 β€” πŸ‘ 2853    πŸ” 1051    πŸ’¬ 68    πŸ“Œ 109

I couldn't resist

02.08.2025 15:47 β€” πŸ‘ 46    πŸ” 10    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 0

Turns out Richard Ebright too has a track record of publishing crap…who’d have thought it.

Just wait and see how much GoF research he does with dangerous pathogens at arms length….

02.08.2025 19:46 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

His chair was an academy member (Communicated by Carroll M. Williams, December 29, 1980).

02.08.2025 19:45 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Whoops I meant, [3H]cAMP (don't want to get sued).

02.08.2025 19:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I still can't get over the fact that the fathers of Molecular Biology gave the *teenage* future Mr. BioSafety a tube of radioactive dTTP and unfettered access to their labs.

02.08.2025 19:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Wow, not surprising, check out the acknowledgments

02.08.2025 16:20 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Seeing Richard Ebright's name reminds me of another recent thread...

bsky.app/profile/jere...

1/n

02.08.2025 15:30 β€” πŸ‘ 56    πŸ” 12    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 7

This is a fantastic story I did not know. Ebright and his college roommate were once celebrated as the next Watson & Crick. Check out the acknowledgments in his first paper. Times sure have changed. www.pnas.org/doi/epdf/10....

02.08.2025 16:14 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

OK, I held my nose and took a lookβ€” surprised to see Richard Ebright is now a straight-up White Nationalist. Who knew I could lose even more respect for a once great biochemist.

02.08.2025 14:03 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Who wants to log in to X and see how long it takes Ebright to go ballistic on Jeremy?

02.08.2025 12:52 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

Bhattacharya's entire FAME is built on falsified IFR data, which he used to encourage people to get COVID. That's what killed people, NOT a GOFRC.

02.08.2025 12:45 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Another straightforward take on the science of COVID origins, and the trouble with politicising it.

02.08.2025 12:34 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Another email to Bhattacharya about his interview and his continued statements that NIH's gain of function research caused the COVID pandemic and killed millions of people.

1/8

01.08.2025 21:11 β€” πŸ‘ 204    πŸ” 62    πŸ’¬ 11    πŸ“Œ 14

You keep giving him a pass on the fact that his entire FAME is built on falsified IFR data he used to encourage people to get COVID. That's what killed people, NOT a GOFRC.

02.08.2025 12:41 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

I sent a letter to Bhattacharya while listening to the mark-up.

More to come from this interview...

1/4

31.07.2025 17:06 β€” πŸ‘ 27    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Oh. My. God.

The disinformation that this MAGA/MAHA guy peddles is off the charts πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ

31.07.2025 13:05 β€” πŸ‘ 18    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Dr Bhattacharya is immune to facts he disagrees with. Why even bother meeting with your employees if you’re going to ignore what they’re telling you? The lack of accountability is appalling.

31.07.2025 10:46 β€” πŸ‘ 28    πŸ” 10    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

It's took 6 mos for fascism to take hold in the U.S. As a 66 yr old I've watched this motherfucking shit unfold for the last 44 years. Reagan should burn in hell for all eternity for what he/his regime did to America. Where we are today is a direct result. Also, Nixon NEVER should've been pardoned!

30.07.2025 19:08 β€” πŸ‘ 204    πŸ” 55    πŸ’¬ 10    πŸ“Œ 2
Preview
The Lab-Leak Hypothesis Made It Harder for Scientists to Seek the Truth Virus origin stories have always been prone to conspiracy theories. COVID disinformation has threatened researchβ€”and lives

More than 3yrs down the line this has held up surprisingly well, very much because of @lewan.bsky.social prescience borne from climategate and previous clashes with USRTK

What we couldn’t predict was how the conspiracists would destroy US biomed science
www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-...

30.07.2025 08:32 β€” πŸ‘ 45    πŸ” 16    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 0

What kind of a public-health moron would say, β€œWe have never talked about environmental exposures that may, say, cause cancer.”

30.07.2025 12:37 β€” πŸ‘ 1221    πŸ” 265    πŸ’¬ 66    πŸ“Œ 13
Video thumbnail

It has taken medical science 200 years to advance humans to the point where people are so healthy and living so long that they can deny that science and medicine is what got us here.

30.07.2025 11:57 β€” πŸ‘ 16528    πŸ” 5420    πŸ’¬ 413    πŸ“Œ 337
Preview
How conspiracy theories about COVID’s origins are hampering our ability to prevent the next pandemic The COVID pandemic likely began when the virus jumped from animals to humans, and didn’t start in a lab. But false narratives continue to circulate.

The politically weaponized "lab leak" theory is destroying both pandemic preparedness & all of American science.

Grateful to @kgandersen.bsky.social, @arambaut.bsky.social, @eddieholmes.bsky.social, & Bob Garry for their courage & commitment to our field.

theconversation.com/how-conspira...

29.07.2025 21:15 β€” πŸ‘ 142    πŸ” 55    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 3
Trump Administration Puts New Chokehold on Billions in Health-Research Funding The National Institutes of Health can’t award grants to outside researchers under a new White House restriction.

Really wish we were living on a normal timeline instead of dealing with this πŸ‚πŸ’©

www.wsj.com/politics/pol...

30.07.2025 00:34 β€” πŸ‘ 37    πŸ” 13    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

@sfederick is following 20 prominent accounts