Erik Peinert's Avatar

Erik Peinert

@erikpeinert.bsky.social

Assistant Professor at Boston University Political Science. PhD Brown University. Comparative and international political economy. Competition, market power, and maybe lots of other things. Views my own. https://www.erikpeinert.com/

979 Followers  |  764 Following  |  67 Posts  |  Joined: 06.11.2023  |  1.9951

Latest posts by erikpeinert.bsky.social on Bluesky

“Capitalism forces you to wake up at 7am against your body’s natural rhythms” no that’s Taylorism and if you don’t like living in a society that coordinates effort to ensure a better outcome for all then I don’t think you’ll love the alternatives

24.11.2025 11:49 — 👍 429    🔁 30    💬 70    📌 109

i really struggle to understand why centre left parties do not like universities, do not like the soft power we wield (imagine getting to educate the children of your geopolitical rivals!!!! IMAGINE!!!). i dont believe that albo, starmer, etc are this stupid, it's got to be hatred. but y.

24.11.2025 11:36 — 👍 137    🔁 17    💬 6    📌 4

In normal democracy terms, we've in bad shape and things are getting worse.

In consolidated authoritarianism terms, we're doing pretty well, as the regime is haphazard, meeting resistance, and growing increasingly unpopular.

Depends on one's perspective. I started using the latter standard in Jan.

22.11.2025 17:48 — 👍 1454    🔁 303    💬 34    📌 9

Elsewhere everyone’s laughing about Grok’s sycophantic answers about Musk’s intelligence and physical prowess, but the project is to make the truth too expensive (in terms of time and resources) for ordinary people to find. Most users will accept the ‘truth’ provided by the model owners.

20.11.2025 13:21 — 👍 200    🔁 41    💬 2    📌 2

If this is what they are doing with the AI, what do you think they are doing with the much simpler and easier to control algorithm that chooses which posts you see and which of your posts are seen by others?

12.11.2025 04:56 — 👍 2630    🔁 691    💬 34    📌 18

Yep:

"Caving as they were winning the fight, and as Trump abuses power to hurt regular people (withholding SNAP benefits, canceling flights) supposedly as 'punishment' for the shutdown, sets a nightmare precedent."

10.11.2025 12:37 — 👍 401    🔁 115    💬 17    📌 6
Post image

The entire project here is so cynical. "We have to end foreign aid until we fix unemployment and bad schools!"

ok are you working to fix those problems?

"No."

09.11.2025 14:58 — 👍 754    🔁 90    💬 18    📌 7
NYT headline: Judge Orders Trump Administration to Fully Fund Food Stamps This Month

The Justice Department later said it would appeal, leaving the program known as SNAP in limbo.

NYT headline: Judge Orders Trump Administration to Fully Fund Food Stamps This Month The Justice Department later said it would appeal, leaving the program known as SNAP in limbo.

The Trump administration is now literally *fighting* to deny food to 42 million people, more than a third of them children.

Read that again.

www.nytimes.com/2025/11/06/u...

07.11.2025 02:21 — 👍 1485    🔁 564    💬 41    📌 37
Post image

For no particular reason today

06.11.2025 20:46 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Americans admire Singaporean governance but then wonder why they can't get the same level of skilled governance while considering everyone who works for the state evil and unworthy of their salary. Telling!

04.11.2025 23:55 — 👍 137    🔁 21    💬 3    📌 2
Many people have asked me what I'll do if — as is incredibly likely at this point
- Trump tragically wins the nomination. Will I coalesce around the nominee and support "my" party, they wonder?
The answer is no. Also hell no. Also how dare you even ask me that?
I have spent months calling Trump what he is: a conman, a tyrant, a pathological liar, a flamboyant despot, a fraudster, a big government liberal, progressive in a very poorly fitting and unconvincing conservative costume, a Planned Parenthood apologist, an unrepentant philanderer, a crook, a creep, a fascist with a spray tan, a reality TV Mussolini, a Caligula with bad hair, etc.
How could I possibly vote for a guy who I've just described this way? How could I possibly unite around this man when I've spent months correctly observing the fact that he's a scam artist who lies about everything, including his opposition to illegal immigration?

Many people have asked me what I'll do if — as is incredibly likely at this point - Trump tragically wins the nomination. Will I coalesce around the nominee and support "my" party, they wonder? The answer is no. Also hell no. Also how dare you even ask me that? I have spent months calling Trump what he is: a conman, a tyrant, a pathological liar, a flamboyant despot, a fraudster, a big government liberal, progressive in a very poorly fitting and unconvincing conservative costume, a Planned Parenthood apologist, an unrepentant philanderer, a crook, a creep, a fascist with a spray tan, a reality TV Mussolini, a Caligula with bad hair, etc. How could I possibly vote for a guy who I've just described this way? How could I possibly unite around this man when I've spent months correctly observing the fact that he's a scam artist who lies about everything, including his opposition to illegal immigration?

When they say they’d never support Fuentes, ask them about what they used to say about Trump. This is from a now deleted piece on The Blaze from Matt Walsh

04.11.2025 16:34 — 👍 494    🔁 136    💬 10    📌 4

Border Patrol agent Lairmore testifies that he was not injured by the sandwich, but he felt the impact through his ballistic vest.

The sandwich came apart and "kind of exploded" on his chest upon impact, he says.

"I could smell the onions and mustard."

04.11.2025 15:32 — 👍 10705    🔁 2161    💬 1107    📌 2643

The problem with most of Yglesias’s advice for Democrats is that Republicans do the opposite and win all the time. So it’s either bad advice or evidence of an asymmetric playing field, which he never addresses.

04.11.2025 13:11 — 👍 809    🔁 123    💬 18    📌 4

This magazine just fired all of their politics staffers

03.11.2025 21:59 — 👍 5151    🔁 1944    💬 90    📌 27

It’s not ever about the numbers—you can bring insane audience engagement, views, eyeballs to your verticals, shape the conversation in wonderful ways, win awards and on and on

And they still will nuke your job and your entire desk in the name of capital consolidation and kissing the fucking ring

03.11.2025 20:45 — 👍 1468    🔁 343    💬 9    📌 18

Alright I fucking wrote about this. It was apparently necessary to vent my rage about this this afternoon, because that took me two hours to get it all out and onto the page.

03.11.2025 23:08 — 👍 754    🔁 247    💬 9    📌 19

You don’t get to name your kid X Æ A-12 and then say “or whatever his name is” about anyone else.

03.11.2025 21:23 — 👍 10039    🔁 1782    💬 122    📌 23

Once again - just like they don't shut the government down when they control all of its branches & refuse to swear in elected representatives of the other party - normal, mainstream, pro-democracy political parties do not make restricting suffrage the central pillar of their policy platform.

03.11.2025 18:07 — 👍 218    🔁 72    💬 2    📌 0

This is insane, and now I know why a helicopter buzzing repeatedly woke me up at 4:30am that day. This time they wanted to be done before the traffic started, but the helicopter might've given it away? This cruelty needs to be widely publicized. @marisakabas.bsky.social @georgetownuni.bsky.social

03.11.2025 17:27 — 👍 129    🔁 62    💬 2    📌 1

-Sep 30: USDA releases guidance saying they can use contingency fund
-Oct 10: USDA tells states to prepare for lapse
-Oct 23: USDA deletes guidance saying they can use contingency fund
-Oct 24: USDA says it can’t use contingency fund
-Oct 31: Courts tell USDA to release funds
-Nov 1: no funds go out

03.11.2025 14:31 — 👍 874    🔁 383    💬 19    📌 31

The messaging debates are disconnected from the fact that bills that Democrats brought to the floor of Congress have provisions that poll extremely well, whereas the bills that the GOP brought to the floor in Trump I and Trump II are among the least popular bills ever seen in modern polling

01.11.2025 21:10 — 👍 389    🔁 68    💬 9    📌 0

Let’s be clear, most EBT users are white. The reason he’s specifically lying about “weaves” and we’ve seen so many AI fakes of Black women ranting about food stamps is they need to make BW the face EBT because they know many Americans don’t care if Black people suffer, and some actually wish for it.

01.11.2025 17:22 — 👍 6013    🔁 1927    💬 174    📌 93

This is part of the war over How We Remember the Pandemic

Always remember the truth: it was a big deal, most regular people were sensible at the time, the anti-vaccine craziness set in late & has been trying to rewrite history ever since

31.10.2025 13:28 — 👍 860    🔁 190    💬 28    📌 12

“some people abuse SNAP” your soul is rotten

30.10.2025 17:35 — 👍 11900    🔁 3014    💬 223    📌 224

unbelievable

31.10.2025 12:39 — 👍 8    🔁 6    💬 0    📌 1

A bajillion is a lot and this still underestimates how much more this mattered than almost anything else

30.10.2025 19:06 — 👍 5    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
In fall 2022, ahead of the midterm elections, Garland opted to freeze both the classified documents and election investigations because of what some officials believed was his overly cautious reading of a DOJ policy not to take any public action close to an election.
Trump was not even on the ballot and had not yet declared his presidential candidacy for 2024.
But Garland nonetheless imposed the freeze.

In fall 2022, ahead of the midterm elections, Garland opted to freeze both the classified documents and election investigations because of what some officials believed was his overly cautious reading of a DOJ policy not to take any public action close to an election. Trump was not even on the ballot and had not yet declared his presidential candidacy for 2024. But Garland nonetheless imposed the freeze.

The selection of Garland as AG and his failure to act was about ten bajillion times more consequential than any campaign strategy decision

www.msnbc.com/msnbc/news/t...

30.10.2025 15:02 — 👍 2601    🔁 527    💬 83    📌 62

@erikpeinert is following 20 prominent accounts