For what it's worth, I appreciate you
28.05.2025 03:00 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
@eemikula.bsky.social
For what it's worth, I appreciate you
28.05.2025 03:00 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I had some real New England pride in 2020 when the canned soups at the grocery store were cleared out except for the Manhattan stuff
24.05.2025 16:25 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Remove a letter, ruin a movie
AWS
Hi, Iβm autistic and Iβm the mayor of my city.
17.04.2025 01:54 β π 24160 π 4652 π¬ 624 π 164A few weeks before you go moldy, but nevertheless, a few weeks standing testament to mankind's contempt for the natural order. Who wouldn't want that?
19.01.2025 03:59 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The fact that it wasnβt will forever be Americaβs shame.
05.01.2025 03:07 β π 47480 π 10462 π¬ 1535 π 499What's such a shame is if the US committed to walkable cities, it'd probably blow everything that exists out of the water. I've lived in a couple of mixed use apartment complexes here and they're incredible. You can cut out so many car trips by having certain amenities onsite, then for the rest
01.01.2025 02:42 β π 183 π 12 π¬ 9 π 0Strong endorse. Iβve never found it credible that the VPN provider was magically more trustworthy than the ISP.
22.12.2024 18:22 β π 78 π 6 π¬ 4 π 0Little Kitty VERY interested in Little Kitty Big City. @littlekittybigcity.bsky.social
01.12.2024 00:24 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Trump when asked about replacing Obamacare
11.09.2024 02:41 β π 1677 π 384 π¬ 12 π 11I'll admit I'd never really considered the fact that I'm more likely to be harmed by dictionaries than you, since you'll never be found anywhere near one.
11.11.2023 04:00 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0You said "because the original moron thinks that OED only cites "anti-semetism" and thus he's correct"
That was incorrect.
But whatever. Keep imagining an entirely different discussion than the one we've had. In your head you impressed everyone. That's what counts, right?
Okay. So criticize HIM for THAT instead of me entirely different things where your statements are just factually wrong.
11.11.2023 03:51 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0And I shouldn't have to tell you what the problem is with falsely representing both what a person says and also what a dictionary says. I really shouldn't.
11.11.2023 03:45 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Lol
bsky.app/profile/radi...
Cute way to respond to proof your reading comprehension sucks.
11.11.2023 03:41 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0One that doesn't like daylight saving time. A real degenerate.
11.11.2023 03:39 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0He supported Oxford. Oxford supports both. And you now pretend that he said that Oxford only supported one.
You're just plain way off base here.
Which words of mine exactly?
11.11.2023 03:37 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0No, that's not what the "original moron" said at all.
11.11.2023 03:36 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Do you just plain fantasize what other people might be thinking, and then argue against that?
11.11.2023 03:35 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 1Let me help: I only ever commented on what Oxford SAID, because I was responding to a comment that was suggesting someone following Oxford wouldn't use both.
I said nothing about what Oxford is. You're imagining this to be about something entirely different.
I wasn't aware that I ever made any claim at all about what it is.
11.11.2023 03:27 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0And I'm just trying to help keep you from losing track of that point and wandering off into misunderstanding what a dictionary says. You're welcome.
11.11.2023 03:25 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0If that's your point then maybe try sticking to that point, especially since your point here was wrong about Oxford.
11.11.2023 03:22 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Then why are you complaining that he has also used that form?
11.11.2023 03:17 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0