Atomic Allotment's Avatar

Atomic Allotment

@atomic-allotment.bsky.social

Nuclear Physics Graduate ☒️. Autistic. Socialist πŸ‰. British πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§. I enjoy challenging people's preconceptions on nuclear power and it's physics. Apologies if I don't reply, the social anxiety is real (Also why I don't post).

49 Followers  |  48 Following  |  25 Posts  |  Joined: 16.11.2024  |  2.3272

Latest posts by atomic-allotment.bsky.social on Bluesky

Oh, I completely agree. Any progress is good.
I appreciate that I'm very much in a minority that considers this a voting issue, but the prospect of potentially being able to throw my support behind a green party is new and exciting. I hope Zack continues to evolve this party. 😊

31.05.2025 20:47 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Zack is definitely a very promising figure and I'm sure he'd do a grand job if he became party leader.
The only point holding me back is his tepid support of nuclear power.
Though credit where its due, it's still a massive improvement over current and previous leadership.

30.05.2025 21:19 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

BREAKING: After telling us that if Hamas releases the hostages, the war ends, Israel is now telling us the hostages can't be released because that would mean the war ends x

20.04.2025 13:13 β€” πŸ‘ 391    πŸ” 158    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 6
Post image 26.01.2025 20:12 β€” πŸ‘ 1905    πŸ” 166    πŸ’¬ 35    πŸ“Œ 4

That's fine if you're running it offline, but if it's connected it's a real security risk. Even without downloading anything dodgy. 😊

21.12.2024 20:25 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

God I miss the 2019 labour party. 😒

10.12.2024 08:36 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It's a red flag for me because being the "green" party, I'd expect them to put climate policy pretty high on their priorities. This is in direct contradiction with their energy policy.
If they're not going to take their climate policy seriously, how can I trust that they'll take the rest seriously?

10.12.2024 08:35 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The reason I can't vote green is because of their energy policies. I can get behind more wind and solar, but to back it up with gas not nuclear? I don't know if it's the gas lobby or an anti-science bias, but that's a huge red flag to me.

09.12.2024 21:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 06.12.2024 19:52 β€” πŸ‘ 35557    πŸ” 3968    πŸ’¬ 325    πŸ“Œ 158

1/5 A groundbreaking Amnesty report published today concludes Israeli authorities are committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. www.amnesty.org.uk/genocide-rep...

05.12.2024 09:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1778    πŸ” 1188    πŸ’¬ 37    πŸ“Œ 141

"Most real farmers", stop with that true Scotsmen logic fallacy.
It will close the tax loophole hole for millionaires (good)
It will shaft family farms (bad)
And it won't directly impact private firms like Blackrock except giving them farms to take over on the cheap.
Or is that what you want?

25.11.2024 14:55 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

So, taking a Β£3mil farm. Β£2m is taxable at 10%. Β£200,000 tax bill every 40-50 years is not insignificant. And because of sky high land prices (more in some locations than others), that won't have a large chunk of farmland meaning revenue won't be high.

25.11.2024 14:50 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Again, I'm not against the inheritance tax.
Sure, you vision of nationwide children inheritance is wonderful, but that's not on offer, that's not happening.
Tax loopholes need to be closed - we agree.
The current proposal would make almost every family farm commercially un-viable.

25.11.2024 13:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

If farms are getting taxed at 10% total value over Β£1m every, what, 40-50 years?
In a few generations there won't be any family owned farms because it simply wouldn't be profitable.
I'm not against the inheritance tax but it needs fine tuning, there are nuances here you're ignoring.

25.11.2024 13:34 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Unfortunately Biden and Harris have undermined a lot of their voter base by maintaining Trump era policies. (For example, middle Eastern policy)

22.11.2024 07:21 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The ICJ never said that they are (to my knowledge) just that there's reasonable grounds to investigate that accusation. They're still in their "investigation" phase.

21.11.2024 14:26 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The warrants never got issued before. Israel and their allies objected to whether or not the ICC had jurisdiction.

21.11.2024 12:17 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Finally!

21.11.2024 12:16 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Situation in the State of Palestine: ICC Pre-Trial Chamber I rejects the State of Israel’s challenges to jurisdiction and issues warrants of arrest for Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant Today, on 21 November 2024, Pre-Trial Chamber I of the International Criminal Court (β€˜Court’), in its composition for the Situation in the State of Palestine, unanimously issued two decisions rejectin...

BREAKING:🚨The ICC has issued arrest warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant for war crimes 🚨

Source: www.icc-cpi.int/news/situati...

21.11.2024 11:59 β€” πŸ‘ 85    πŸ” 30    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 5

Again, feeding into the importance of the subs. πŸ˜„

21.11.2024 08:31 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Gimme your favorite mispronounced word? I’m really coming around on nookyuhler.

21.11.2024 04:11 β€” πŸ‘ 4612    πŸ” 60    πŸ’¬ 1547    πŸ“Œ 121

...okay? That's not what I was endorsing?
I was drawing a parallel between the new technology and time proven technology.

20.11.2024 16:28 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Erosion takes place on the turbine side which is the area that can be/is maintained. Though how often would that need doing?
I'm imagining very rarely though at this point I'll happily admit I'm out of my depth. :)

20.11.2024 16:27 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

SMRs are like the next evolution of submarine reactors. Both are designed for constant high output with bare minimal maintenance. But SMRs operate autonomously/remotely.
There's some cool designs out there that use pumps without moving parts (near impossible to break!).

Hope I got the tone right?

20.11.2024 16:22 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I made no reference to renewables as I agree that - in this example - they have no place.
Nuclear can and does get dismantled (though legacy designs are... challenging.
SMRs are designed to operate without physical intervention and core maintenance. I recommend that you look at a few designs (cool).

20.11.2024 16:19 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

So, say Microsoft or Amazon have decided to generate their own electricity on site. What source can they use for consistent and high power?
The only options are diesel generators or small nuclear.
As long as they're not left in charge of regulating it's safety, I see no issues.

20.11.2024 09:23 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Large data centers and other power hungry infrastructure need consistent power input. They use power from the grid (pushing everyone's rates up) or they can generate their own on site, which is better in efficiency and potentially more consistent with electricity rates.

20.11.2024 09:20 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Countries and people still use coal because its cheap* and easy.
*ignoring costs from climate change and pollution.
You can repair a reactor, just not really it's core. But when it can run for many decades almost constantly (high capacity factor), you get your bang for your buck. πŸ˜„

20.11.2024 08:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yoink!

20.11.2024 07:35 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

My politics

19.11.2024 15:10 β€” πŸ‘ 33    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

@atomic-allotment is following 20 prominent accounts