Bourgeois mfer's Avatar

Bourgeois mfer

@ghunkinking.bsky.social

215 Followers  |  158 Following  |  3,862 Posts  |  Joined: 14.11.2024  |  1.9453

Latest posts by ghunkinking.bsky.social on Bluesky

Post image 22.11.2025 02:12 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 21.11.2025 23:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 21.11.2025 23:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 21.11.2025 22:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 21.11.2025 22:45 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 21.11.2025 22:33 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

So you made it up?

21.11.2025 22:20 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Please post the link

21.11.2025 22:04 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Show me a single mistake in the math?

21.11.2025 21:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It's just not I showed you the proof that it isn't if you disagree, disprove my math.

21.11.2025 21:39 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

And you couldn't show a mathematical proof if your life depended on it while proclaiming bangers like β€œthe first derivative of the keeling curve is linear” If you proclaimed 5+5 is 89 it wouldn't have been more wrong, your math is very unique.

21.11.2025 21:33 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Honestly, where did your math education stop? You’re enthusiastic, I’ll give you that, but there are some very large gaps.

21.11.2025 21:18 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I’ve posted half a dozen proofs showing your assertions are wrong. I dare you to find a single mathematical mistake in any of them. In contrast, you keep throwing out one incorrect claim after another.

21.11.2025 21:17 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Wait, this, are you for real, did you even finish high school calculus?
Picking a few far-apart averaged points and checking whether those lie on a line tells you nothing about the global curvature of the averaged curve.
Linearity is about the whole smoothed function, not three cherry-picked samples

21.11.2025 21:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

As a yard enjoyer, I think β€œconspicuous consumption” yard hygiene is actually fine. They’re just used too much. I’ve even seen them clearing bike lanes, do they think cyclists are that fragile just because of a slippery surface?

21.11.2025 20:40 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Where did you present a counter example post it again, and I will look at it and likely dismantle it.

21.11.2025 20:35 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

And in contrast to you, I actually show my math.

21.11.2025 20:30 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Because you make the same mathematically nonsensical claims again and again and again, as long as you do, and as long as I’m not bored or have something better to do, I will disprove them again and again.

21.11.2025 20:28 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 21.11.2025 20:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 21.11.2025 20:19 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 21.11.2025 20:09 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 21.11.2025 20:02 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

If anything β€œlarger than the window” were unchanged except for scaling, then rolling-averaging an exponential or cubic wouldn’t straighten them, but it does.
That alone falsifies the claim.
Again, friend this is pretty simple college math.

21.11.2025 19:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

A moving average isn’t a β€œsize cutoff.”
Because it’s a convolution, it mixes each point with neighbors and therefore changes every slope and curvature value, not just the small ones.
Large-scale changes get distorted, not just scaled.

21.11.2025 19:50 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 21.11.2025 19:46 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 21.11.2025 18:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Buddy again this is first year college math, you should really be looking into online classes or maybe there is a decent community college near you.

21.11.2025 18:27 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

How would that work who would we use instead of SpaceX?

21.11.2025 12:03 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 21.11.2025 09:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

What are you guys investing your retirement savings in that makes you all so downbeat? Elder millennial here (1982), and my retirement accounts have done exceptionally well with just the cheapest ETFs I could find over the last few decades. Even with a 30% haircut, they’d still be doing fine.

20.11.2025 20:28 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@ghunkinking is following 19 prominent accounts