@ghunkinking.bsky.social
So you made it up?
21.11.2025 22:20 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Please post the link
21.11.2025 22:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Show me a single mistake in the math?
21.11.2025 21:51 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0It's just not I showed you the proof that it isn't if you disagree, disprove my math.
21.11.2025 21:39 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0And you couldn't show a mathematical proof if your life depended on it while proclaiming bangers like βthe first derivative of the keeling curve is linearβ If you proclaimed 5+5 is 89 it wouldn't have been more wrong, your math is very unique.
21.11.2025 21:33 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Honestly, where did your math education stop? Youβre enthusiastic, Iβll give you that, but there are some very large gaps.
21.11.2025 21:18 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Iβve posted half a dozen proofs showing your assertions are wrong. I dare you to find a single mathematical mistake in any of them. In contrast, you keep throwing out one incorrect claim after another.
21.11.2025 21:17 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Wait, this, are you for real, did you even finish high school calculus?
Picking a few far-apart averaged points and checking whether those lie on a line tells you nothing about the global curvature of the averaged curve.
Linearity is about the whole smoothed function, not three cherry-picked samples
As a yard enjoyer, I think βconspicuous consumptionβ yard hygiene is actually fine. Theyβre just used too much. Iβve even seen them clearing bike lanes, do they think cyclists are that fragile just because of a slippery surface?
21.11.2025 20:40 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Where did you present a counter example post it again, and I will look at it and likely dismantle it.
21.11.2025 20:35 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0And in contrast to you, I actually show my math.
21.11.2025 20:30 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Because you make the same mathematically nonsensical claims again and again and again, as long as you do, and as long as Iβm not bored or have something better to do, I will disprove them again and again.
21.11.2025 20:28 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0If anything βlarger than the windowβ were unchanged except for scaling, then rolling-averaging an exponential or cubic wouldnβt straighten them, but it does.
That alone falsifies the claim.
Again, friend this is pretty simple college math.
A moving average isnβt a βsize cutoff.β
Because itβs a convolution, it mixes each point with neighbors and therefore changes every slope and curvature value, not just the small ones.
Large-scale changes get distorted, not just scaled.
Buddy again this is first year college math, you should really be looking into online classes or maybe there is a decent community college near you.
21.11.2025 18:27 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0How would that work who would we use instead of SpaceX?
21.11.2025 12:03 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0What are you guys investing your retirement savings in that makes you all so downbeat? Elder millennial here (1982), and my retirement accounts have done exceptionally well with just the cheapest ETFs I could find over the last few decades. Even with a 30% haircut, theyβd still be doing fine.
20.11.2025 20:28 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0