Naive question: I thought targeted was about sensitivity -
why ng?
@michaelsteidel.bsky.social
#Cellzome #TeamMassSpec #Proteomics opinions are my own
Naive question: I thought targeted was about sensitivity -
why ng?
It's called the Agilent 6495D.
03.01.2026 10:32 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Not a conference, but worth flagging:
EMBO Practical Course โTargeted proteomics: advanced tools for biomedical researchโ Barcelona, 8โ13 Nov 2026
Line-up not announced yet, but previous editions organized by @maccoss.bsky.social with invited speakers incl. Alexey Nesvizhskii and Vadim Demichev.
Proteomic Ruler question:
In Wiลniewski et al., MCP 2014, the histoneโDNA proxy seems implicit.
Is there any explicit reference stating that the Ruler uses only core histones (H2A/H2B/H3/H4) and excludes H1?
#proteomics #massspec
I agree MaxLFQ isnโt meant for absolute quantification.
But that still doesnโt explain the complete lack of correlation with UPS2.
From my experience, iBAQ and MaxLFQ usually correlate well (Rยฒ ~0.78, non related example dataset shown), suggesting they track the same MS1 signal.
As shown in the DIA-NN paper, the mobility term contributes only negligibly to the discriminant score, suggesting that measured CCS -even with good IM resolution - might simply be too affected by gas-phase ionโion / ionโneutral interactions to provide a stable, high-specificity constraint โฆ
06.12.2025 14:16 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0With a quadrupole we know exactly which precursor m/z window was isolated -the precursor mass is tightly defined with a well-characterised error. My question was whether CCS can provide anything close to that level of search-space restriction for database searching.
06.12.2025 14:12 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0My point rather was whether precursor CCS can actually constrain the search space during database searching not just what Da-equivalent tolerance it has.
06.12.2025 14:04 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Asking for a friend: Is intrinsic specificity of CCS high enough to serve as an effective in silico precursor filter during database searching?
06.12.2025 12:24 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0โVery interesting! Do you know whether ProteomeSciences is already testing the new DXT tags with selected customers or collaborators, or is it still entirely in-house at this stage?โ
20.11.2025 11:54 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Bonus, info about DIA multiplex tags, up to 30-plex:
"trademark DXT for our DIA multiplex tags...advances have been made in DXT multiplexing since ASMS with the number of tags increased from 6 to 11 and with the potential to
increase these to beyond 30"
Fantastic project led by @bo-wen.bsky.social. Excited to see the future uses of AI and transfer learning in proteomics. #massspec #proteomics
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Which LC & Flow?
07.10.2025 16:38 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Surprised that u go so low. With EvoSep 24 min method we can load lots more on our Ultra2 until reaching saturation especially with ICC2.0
07.10.2025 14:56 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0How much are you loading per injection? Is ICC 2.0 enabled on the Ultra2? And which library are you using?
07.10.2025 06:01 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0True โ but the odd part is that the Human Reference Proteome is not really โcanonical onlyโ. Non-canonical entries from TrEMBL are included, yet the curated SwissProt isoforms are missing default. Thatโs what undermines the idea of a high-quality reference set.
02.10.2025 06:34 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0On a separate note: I was surprised to find that none of the non-canonical SwissProt isoforms are included in the official human reference proteome (UP000005640).
Anyone know whatโs going on here? ๐ค
#proteomics #bioinformatics @pwilmarth.bsky.social il
By the way.. 43% of current TREMBL entries will be dropped soon anyway insideuniprot.blogspot.com/2025/06/capt...
30.09.2025 14:22 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Hey #TeamMassSpec,
Many non-human proteomics studies still search against taxon-filtered FASTAs.
โ Redundant sequences
โ Inflated search space
โ
Reference proteomes cut redundancy, improve annotation, and make results comparable.
๐ Time to move beyond taxon filters. #proteomics #massspec #uniprot
Without #2, a lower ion count is needed just to be sure that the full MS range is scanned, but with more accurate ion counts, you can go to the max S/N without losing ions on the edges.
This could also work for the Orbitrap Astral.
Bonus: DIAPASEF on Thermo - patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/de...
With ๐๐๐-๐ก๐ก ๐ฎ.๐ฏ.๐ฌ Preview (Academia-only for now), we showcase the transformative new capabilities that have been developed in the past months. Download: github.com/vdemichev/Di...
26.09.2025 09:52 โ ๐ 29 ๐ 6 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 0Thanks @pwilmarth.bsky.social - also included the less-redundant "one protein per gene" db here ...Has anybody assessed potential benefits of the reduced search space on sensitivity?
25.09.2025 21:21 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0aaah guess its "hidden" there :)
25.09.2025 13:39 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Great thanks! Where can I find the one protein per gene option?
25.09.2025 13:34 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Hey #TeamMassSpec,
When you run proteomics on non-human species (mouse, rat, macaque, etc.) โ which protein FASTA do you prefer?
Taxonomy-filtered UniProt (all entries)
Reference proteome (SwissProt+TrEMBL)
Ensembl/GENCODE
Something else?
๐ฏ
06.08.2025 21:07 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Astral Zoom hits >7,000 protein groups & 67,000 precursors โ on a 500 SPD EvoSep ENO run.
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
Is that narrow windowed thin-PASEF?
09.07.2025 21:49 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0DIA, DOA, DUI, DDA, etc. Here is a comparisons of some quantitative proteomics methods from a POV you might not have seen before:
github.com/pwilmart/qua...
Sciex in the game.
Pretty impressed by ScanningSWATH data on the new ZenoTOF 8600.
#TeamMassSpec