What, RD is involved????
Any shred of credibility left that this campaign had has now been completely obliterated.
@calliencd.bsky.social
Middle aged woman trying to work out where she stands in this โsaneโ world. ๐ณ๏ธโโง๏ธ๐ช๐บ๐โโฌ๐ฆ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ Am I ever wrong? Yes, just like everyone else. Do I have doubts? Yes of course, I wouldnโt trust anyone who didnโt.
What, RD is involved????
Any shred of credibility left that this campaign had has now been completely obliterated.
(Stupid but to be expected from McSweeny/Starmerโs Labour project).
10.11.2025 07:29 โ ๐ 6 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Iโm not surprised that the telegraph has wound themselves up into a rightwing snowflake frenzy over this, but given this is the report of one man with an axe to grind it is stupid that anyone else is taking any of the parts outside the main point seriously.
10.11.2025 07:29 โ ๐ 9 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0As suspected, most of this so-called report seems to be about the author moaning that his own views werenโt given more priority than others. The trans section is just a screed of outrage that trans people exist and heโs upset the bbc isnโt bullying them more.
10.11.2025 07:29 โ ๐ 11 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Like every one of these cases, it always comes done to the complainants just being deeply unpleasant people and are annoyed at being rightfully seen as such.
07.11.2025 13:50 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Yes I was interested in quite how this so-called commitment manifests. Like most cowardly/hostile organisations they seem to think by saying something it makes it true. . .
07.11.2025 13:21 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Re: resignations in 2023, so about the time that the Baroness went fully public with her outright anti-trans stance once she saw a kindred spirit in Badenoch, GANHRI started making noises (subsequently aborted) of their unsuitability and of course those bullying allegations which just faded away . .
06.11.2025 16:50 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Wow, really helpful, thanks!
So, knowing BP's temperament I'm assuming we will be stuck with AR for another 4 years - ๐.
But on the other hand at least AH will be ditched next year. ๐ฎโ๐จ
This isn't to say that BP can't find just as unpleasant people to replace or bolster them . . . ๐
Ah useful to know! So do we know how long how long the more vicious anti-trans commissioners have got?
06.11.2025 15:17 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I canโt work out if he is completely sh***ing his pants or so utterly lacks self awareness that he is the antithesis of authenticity.
06.11.2025 15:15 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I see that Wesley Streeting is on the News Agents - (because of course he is - no doubt who their preferred successor to Starmer is) - talking about Mamdani and how important it is to be authentic.
06.11.2025 15:15 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Ok, so notwithstanding that no one except GCs know what so-called โgender ideologyโ is, in what way are GCs pro or even neutral towards trans people if they are, according to you not โanti-transโ?
06.11.2025 13:58 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Oh thanks for the info. So are commissioners on a fixed term? I'm thinking mainly of how much longer do we have to endure the anti-trans insider activities from certain current commissioners. . .
On a related issue only 24 days till we see the back of the Baroness!
Are these replacement positions or completely new ones. If they are replacements, who would they be replacing?
05.11.2025 23:08 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Agree, but they are going to try enact as much damage as they can in the process of this tantrum.
04.11.2025 08:56 โ ๐ 8 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Interesting to note that the article refers to โgender critical โactivistsโโ rather than the Guardianโs more usual false positive spin: โwomenโs rights โcampaignersโโ.
Could be nothing, but looks like a subtle shift. . .
But I thought that PM single handed 'killed woke' - or at least that is what he has been saying. . . .
31.10.2025 15:46 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0A great example of pathetic and ignorant gas-lighting.
31.10.2025 00:24 โ ๐ 9 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0They do see, they just donโt care. Their hatred is so intense that they are happy to destroy the lives of all women as long as at least one trans woman is destroyed and in the process.
30.10.2025 22:15 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Dear Lib Dems, you had an opportunity here, but you blew it. You chose cowardice and bigotry and demonstrated to everyone on the fence that you are just an orange version of the Labour Party. Please enjoy your continued pathetic existence on the fringe.
30.10.2025 22:11 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Gosh, she is getting desperate isnโt she!
Only 33 days to go before sheโs gone though!
We are just under 4 years out, so the whole exercise is not to be taken seriously - but this is first time I've seen any model suggest these two lose their seats . . . I don't actually expect them to lose their seats (well, I think WS will) but it does demonstrate their unpopularity aptly.
28.10.2025 11:05 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Just fed these numbers into EC's seat predictor (with tactical voting); while it still gives Reform a win, the silver lining is that with these numbers both Keir Starmer and Wes Streeting would lose their seats! (KS to the Greens, WS to an independent).
www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/fcgi-bin/use...
So 'four Labour Cabinet Ministers' offered words of comfort to TM after a so-called offence from their own colleague. . . yet another indication of the moral lacuna at the heart of this government.
I wonder who they were . . . ?
That said I'm glad she won if only to indulge in the schadenfreude of Phillipson losing.
25.10.2025 20:35 โ ๐ 6 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I guess we'll see, I don't hold out a great deal of hope given her equivocation on issues in the past - while at the time I think I gave her the benefit of the doubt but that goodwill has evaporated from any Labour candidate a long time ago . . .
25.10.2025 20:35 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0'She believed that standing was the right thing to do when it was clear no one else from cabinet was prepared to stand' - says an 'ally' of Phillipson. . .
Definitely giving vibes of - I never wanted your stupid job anyway . .
Such graciousness in defeat. . .
www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
Hang on am I reading that right. . . โI would be astonished if . . . those questions will be addressedโ. So they are saying they donโt expect the โquestionโ of trans rights will be addressed???
Intentional? Typo? Freudian slip. . . ?
That is a very good point - irrational hatred, tends to lead to irrational actions!
25.10.2025 16:21 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Also on the spite front, while Iโm hardly a huge fan Lucy P, or anyone in Labour for that matter, I have been amazed at the vitriolic nature of BPโs campaign. It wasnโt just that LP was BPโs opponent, but she seems to hold a seething loathing of her.
25.10.2025 14:50 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0