It may or may not surprise you to learn that @warren.senate.gov was trying to tackle this problem *before* she was even a member of SASC.
04.08.2025 13:37 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@wjrue.bsky.social
Nat sec, defense, and Dawgs. Was: DASD Force Development & Emerging Capabilities, Sen Warren NSA, OSD CAPE. Always: Girl Dad. Marine. Bulldawg. ATLien. Once and future fly fisher.
It may or may not surprise you to learn that @warren.senate.gov was trying to tackle this problem *before* she was even a member of SASC.
04.08.2025 13:37 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Privatizing housing worked out so well for military families. What could go wrong here?
www.military.com/daily-news/2...
This rules.
11.06.2025 12:27 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0We will not tolerate this slander of such a Good Girl!!
03.05.2025 23:54 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Good thing we helped Republicans keep the government open otherwise a bunch of organizations would have been shuttered and people laid off.
15.03.2025 22:05 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Not only are they likely beginning the process of rolling back many of the grooming standards that have been updated in recent years, it looks like they are cracking the door open to revisiting women in combat arms MOSs too.
(Hope Iβm wrongβon all counts.)
Ahem, Taiwan, call your office.
10.03.2025 21:17 β π 7 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0Such strong defense. Much lethality.
03.03.2025 01:00 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0SASC typically doesnβt hold public nomination hearings for the Service JAGs but Democrats on the committee must demand one. They should refuse unanimous consent on their nominations if they donβt get that hearing too.
23.02.2025 15:51 β π 43 π 16 π¬ 2 π 0Every Chief and Combatant Commander that wasnβt fired probably needs to be asked this series of questions as well.
22.02.2025 14:04 β π 19 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0Sadly, with these blatantly political firings, every single general and flag officer nominee going forward must be asked publicly under oath by SASC what sort of loyalty oaths, if any, they swore to the Administration.
22.02.2025 11:36 β π 104 π 33 π¬ 2 π 1What the absolute fuck
22.02.2025 00:50 β π 31 π 2 π¬ 2 π 1Agree that this is shaping up to be the real test, but now that theyβve signaled a willingness to go along with impoundment at the domestic agencies, itβll be that much harder to keep DOD exempted.
(This was foreseeable to anyone who spent more than 5 seconds thinking about it.)
Anyway, Impoundment Fairy coming home to roost soon enough it appears.
20.02.2025 00:03 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0How do Roger Wicker and Susan Collins feel about major cuts to non-submarine shipbuilding? (They no like.)
So theyβll want to keep buying LPDs and DDGs, but they canβt force the admin to keep writing those MYPs either.
Rinse and repeat across 48 other states and 435 Congressional districts.
BUTβ¦ Now that theyβve signaled their willingness to go along with impoundment at the domestic agencies like NIH and Dept of Ed, whoβs going to force the Admin to spend all the money Congress will still probably give DOD?
19.02.2025 23:55 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0So my guess, and itβs just a guess because I have no idea what Congressional Republicans are thinking, is that defense spending is one of a tiny category of things that Congress will continue to do whatβs in their interest, and that means appropriating what they want (not what the Admin wants).
19.02.2025 23:52 β π 1 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0Congress has been willing to go along with the real and announced cuts to many other agencies and insodoing are ceding their Article I power of the purse.
What are they going to do now that the cuts are coming for defense?
Keep in mind that by exempting many categories of things (such as missile defense, nukes, etc.) that the cuts will be much steeper than 8% on the remaining categories. Is end strength protected? What about training/readiness? 5th gen aircraft? R&D? The list goes on.
19.02.2025 23:42 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0Trying to imagine what would happen if a Democratic Administration did this and my brain is melting.
19.02.2025 23:37 β π 5 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0Ordering a completely arbitrary 8% cut to the defense budget *before* drafting your National Security Strategy and National Defense Strategy is WILD. www.washingtonpost.com/national-sec...
19.02.2025 23:33 β π 17 π 7 π¬ 2 π 0Totally agree. Relatedly, this is why I am skeptical that any administration will be able to marshal the necessary resources to fight China after a move against Taiwan.
These folks couldnβt be bothered to wear a mask. Imagine asking them to drive their cars less because we need JP-5/8.
Itβs going to take every last bit of my willpower to not skeet my way through the next few years, huh.
25.01.2025 03:21 β π 7 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0