Matt Baker's Avatar

Matt Baker

@mebakerlaw.bsky.social

Assistant Teaching Professor @EmoryPoliSci,@polsUGA PhD, @UFLaw JD, & @UCF Alum. Husband & Dad. Former PD. Trial courts, criminal law. Views my own

79 Followers  |  94 Following  |  12 Posts  |  Joined: 21.09.2023  |  1.7378

Latest posts by mebakerlaw.bsky.social on Bluesky

True! The proximity to the facts and parties might make DJs more inclined to take some action. Highly recommend @stevevladeck.bsky.social's recent discussions of the change in how appellate courts are weighing the equities on his Substack...things are coming in so fast it's hard to keep track!

13.06.2025 14:29 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Some of this might be because SCOTUS has been staying almost all of the administration's emergency petitions at this point.

13.06.2025 14:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Temporary Blocks: What You Need to Know About TROs and Preliminary Injunctions An explanation of two key legal concepts at the center of litigation challenging Trump executive orders.

Solid Lawfare article on this: www.lawfaremedia.org/article/temp...

13.06.2025 14:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

*insert vibes*

11.06.2025 18:52 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Thoroughly enjoyed attending the @emorycollege.bsky.social honors ceremony with my @emorypolisci.bsky.social colleagues last night!

12.05.2025 13:54 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I'm close to recommending a time machine to some who are unhappy. DeLorean, Hot Tub, Phone Booth, Time-turner...whatever you fancy.

08.05.2025 13:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

So timely and really helpful!

31.03.2025 15:34 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

From our new issue: "Gender, Race, and Interruptions at Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings" by Christina Boyd, Paul Collins, and Lori Ringhand. #APSRNewIssue www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

21.03.2025 15:00 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

As always, happy to see "One First" on a Monday morning! I start my American Legal System with students reading a selection from Contempt of Court to grapple with the authority of the Court. Thanks Steve!

10.02.2025 14:34 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"The loss of liberty to a generous mind is worse than death; and yet we know there have been those in all ages who for the sake of preferment or some imaginary honor have freely lent a helping hand to oppress, nay to destroy their country. . . ."

28.01.2025 18:34 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Argument in the Zenger Trial (1735) National Constitution Center Historic Documents Library record for Argument in the Zenger Trial (1735)

Teaching freshmen about Zenger's Trial (among other things) and Andrew Hamilton's closing argument feels rather timely... constitutioncenter.org/the-constitu...

28.01.2025 18:34 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
111. Ex parte Milligan and the Limits of Martial Law Although it was later narrowed, the Supreme Court's 1866 repudiation of Civil War-era military commissions remains a bulwark against military authority wherever civilian courts are functioning

In today’s β€œOne First,” I wrote about #SCOTUS’s 1866 decision in Ex parte Milliganβ€”and the limits on martial law and military rule for which it still stands. (It’s also a good excuse to talk about the first β€œclass photo” of the justicesβ€”from February 1867):

www.stevevladeck.com/p/111-ex-par...

02.12.2024 13:20 β€” πŸ‘ 197    πŸ” 51    πŸ’¬ 17    πŸ“Œ 8

Need to step up my recall of One Firsts of yore! Thanks!

02.12.2024 14:47 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Great read, as always! Would love to see some discussion of McCardle with this too, even though the Court didn't overturn Milligan, given the political pressure the Court faced a few years later.

02.12.2024 14:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@mebakerlaw is following 20 prominent accounts