burt

charli etsy X

a tumblr post by supercumrat64 every rush song geddy lee: one thousand years i've been roaming these halls, looking for that cruel, cruel wizard... to unslap my Balls! *plays a synth solo and a bass solo at the same time*

kind of disturbed at how much all the slop is affirming my nostalgia for 80s and 90s stuff. i do not want to be that guy

DATA: Captain, I believe they are referring to the "Artificial Intelligence" of 2025.

PICARD: "AI"?

DATA: Yes sir. In the 21st century, capitalists were using "language learning models" for entertainment, such as art, film, and a practice known as "gooning," which

PICARD: Yes thank you Mr. Data

david manlet

every truth social trump post is just this to me

nirvana stealing eighties from them probably helped them a lot in that regard

really crazy band to read about too. if i remember right the singer ran off to be in a doomsday cult for a while

YouTube video by KillingJokeOfficial Killing Joke - Pandemonium

check this one youtu.be/skUUVejxDZc?...

correct bsky.app/profile/refr...

Twitch Twitch is the world

when i get home today (about 630 est) i am going to play disco elysium completely blind. all i know is its a left-aligned detective rpg-adjacent visual novel-style game. show up or miss out on my irreverent humor and thoughtful political commentary twitch.tv/aceghost

coal keeps the lights on, i drive my $88k truck to an office. i've never used my hands or seen a coal mine. im scared of the subway and books. if you say anything about how i am actually a tiny little baby scared of the world with no interests or values i will get fascist real quick like. manly manl

i did twenty two squats with 30 pound barbells instead but i bet that isn't good enough for [heel voice] YOU PEOPLE

i just tried and am immediately at failure so i will check back in tomorrow, when my count will surely be in the triple digits

ok im done arguing with "centrists" and i have to do.... 16. i uh need water, one second

again, and just before i mute you, we get it: you have failed your entire life. the rest of us would like the world to be better. if you want to continue playing rhetorical games to pretend you're definitely in charge, do it on your own time

"we can't do good things because reality won't allow that" isn't the ideological flex you think it is. you embarrass yourself. please go learn anything about the real world

it is the obvious inevitable conclusion for you, a whining misanthropic wimp

your loser mindset of "we always have to plan on trump winning and not doing anything too hasty" is projection. please go piss your pants in private and leave politics to the grownups

you responded to the suggestion that the democrats should have worked to expand the court while in power (obviously true) with the bootlicker scenario of "ummm actually the REAL problem is hillary didnt win!" as though hillary didnt have the exact same stink on her as the rest of the party

your insipid hypotheticals begin and end with democrats winning elections, because you are a shortsighted intellectual child who cant imagine political accountability outside of voting

i can actually, in my brain which is normal, imagine all the things that the democrats should have done, and reconcile all of them at the same time. it's called having principles. i am sorry this is hard for you

if he was still demented why would he have expanded the court to begin with? can you work backwards from your children's fantasy logic for two seconds?

great point, the democrats should not have run joe biden in the first place. you're getting the idea, very very slowly

use context clues buddy. what time frame do you believe this references:

joe biden, kamala harris, and the rest of the party leaders and cabinet demonstrably did not work to expand the court whatsoever. if they did, that would mean they had entirely different principles, wouldnt it?

hey real quick question: if you run on abortion after your party won a major victory on abortion, does that look better or worse for you than if you didnt do anything while in office

yes. joe biden should be an entirely different type of person with different values and perform entirely different actions. i agree with that person. your problem seems to be that you can only imagine joe biden doing one thing he should have done and everything else being exactly the same

you are imagining a world where a senile conservative playing as a democrat would have expanded the court when he couldnt even survive a debate. the presupposition that the court be expanded by the dems requires a dem who wants to do that, ie a different person. what about this is hard for you

but you, like most dems and centrists, operate on a political spectrum of cowardice and wimpery, so