's Avatar

@eaudemacro.bsky.social

153 Followers  |  148 Following  |  201 Posts  |  Joined: 19.11.2024  |  1.8582

Latest posts by eaudemacro.bsky.social on Bluesky


i truly hate how much we are living in a bad script

02.02.2026 13:42 β€” πŸ‘ 10502    πŸ” 1580    πŸ’¬ 178    πŸ“Œ 37
22.01.2026 22:10 β€” πŸ‘ 17    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Special Counsel Jack Smith in his Opening Remarks:

22.01.2026 15:43 β€” πŸ‘ 16956    πŸ” 5331    πŸ’¬ 289    πŸ“Œ 172

In light of the builders 3 doors down playing Coldplay for what is now running on 2 hours (meaning 2hrs too long), I can sympathise with @gmacdonell.bsky.social’s battles with neighbourhood leaf blowers more than ever.

09.07.2025 03:45 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 24.06.2025 02:54 β€” πŸ‘ 12302    πŸ” 3237    πŸ’¬ 1084    πŸ“Œ 243
Preview
American Democracy Might Not Survive a War With Iran The United States is well down the road to dictatorship. Imagine what Trump would do with a state of war.

Important and timely re: war with Iran and the peril here at home www.theatlantic.com/internationa...

21.06.2025 21:22 β€” πŸ‘ 14    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 2

I am, of course, not the New York Times.

But if I was the New York Times, I would take a professional interest in investigating, exposing, and embarrassing the hell out of that law firm and whatever partner made the decision to retaliate on a nazi’s and his federal judge friend’s behalf.

21.06.2025 12:27 β€” πŸ‘ 1218    πŸ” 126    πŸ’¬ 21    πŸ“Œ 1

101. You can get a cream for them

11.05.2025 13:51 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Corrupt AF

11.05.2025 13:37 β€” πŸ‘ 136    πŸ” 18    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 3
I’ve spoken with a lot of economists β€” plenty of whom I think you’re friendly with, as well as market participants, mostly in the bond market β€” who think that in order to take this position you’ve given up some of your intellectual integrity, and are willing to bend the facts and bend economic principles in service of the political goals of this administration. How do you respond to that view?

I think that’s ridiculous, and I think that it’s very common for people to project their own political preferences onto other people. You know, the administration is focused on creating a dynamic, healthy, robust economic boom for Americans β€” and we’re going to do that.

I’ve spoken with a lot of economists β€” plenty of whom I think you’re friendly with, as well as market participants, mostly in the bond market β€” who think that in order to take this position you’ve given up some of your intellectual integrity, and are willing to bend the facts and bend economic principles in service of the political goals of this administration. How do you respond to that view? I think that’s ridiculous, and I think that it’s very common for people to project their own political preferences onto other people. You know, the administration is focused on creating a dynamic, healthy, robust economic boom for Americans β€” and we’re going to do that.

Trump econ advisor Miran denies he's had to give up his intellectual integrity to work for the president and push policies most economists think are bad: "I think that’s ridiculous, and I think that it’s very common for people to project their own political preferences onto other people." Via NYT

11.05.2025 13:43 β€” πŸ‘ 18    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 2
Post image

America 2025. Bribery edition.

11.05.2025 13:15 β€” πŸ‘ 2370    πŸ” 482    πŸ’¬ 37    πŸ“Œ 6
Post image

When you make a Monty Python co-founder laugh out loud. πŸ’•

10.05.2025 14:57 β€” πŸ‘ 16438    πŸ” 3139    πŸ’¬ 902    πŸ“Œ 227

Miran being forced to actually defend his boss’s stupidity is super revealing. The entire project and everyone in it is personalist and a ton of folks knew this long before last fall some are still only barely figuring it out!

www.nytimes.com/2025/05/10/b...

11.05.2025 04:26 β€” πŸ‘ 158    πŸ” 24    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 4
May 5, 2025 cover of the New Yorker. 

Expository text:

https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-05-05

May 5, 2025 cover of the New Yorker. Expository text: https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-05-05

Barry Blitt’s first 100 days cover for the New Yorker.

28.04.2025 16:08 β€” πŸ‘ 31236    πŸ” 6303    πŸ’¬ 335    πŸ“Œ 251

Every factory on earth, except those located in the United States, can get the inputs they need from China, without paying an additional 145 percent markup.

27.04.2025 17:11 β€” πŸ‘ 5979    πŸ” 1525    πŸ’¬ 131    πŸ“Œ 85

Hey kids, check out these war plans

22.04.2025 12:37 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Not a chance

22.04.2025 03:48 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Policy wonk: So is the goal of the tariffs to bring manufacturing back or is it an opening to negotiate better trade deals?

EU trade representative: we do not understand what the US objectives are?

Vietnam: πŸ’‘

17.04.2025 18:28 β€” πŸ‘ 1007    πŸ” 254    πŸ’¬ 84    πŸ“Œ 14

Between him and Gillian Tett, the only explanation is that someone is putting hallucinogens in the high table port at Cambridge

18.04.2025 11:19 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

El Erian's comment is absolutely bonkers. The point of legislation giving the Fed independence is to allow it to do the job legislators set for it and not what the President wants to do on a day to day basis to ease his political difficulties.

18.04.2025 07:38 β€” πŸ‘ 69    πŸ” 14    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 1

Absolutely ridiculous and irresponsible from El Erian.

If you want to protect the integrity and independence of the Fed, you do not create gratuitous paths to power grabs that directly undermine independence

18.04.2025 07:58 β€” πŸ‘ 133    πŸ” 23    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 0

There’s a reason for that

17.04.2025 23:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Lucky he’s not a dog

17.04.2025 23:36 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I wonder what stocks will be in the Trump ETF …

17.04.2025 22:59 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Without doubt

17.04.2025 22:58 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Finally getting it, are they? That includes Dimon, though I’m not sure he’s that far advanced either.

16.04.2025 01:43 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

πŸš€πŸš€

15.04.2025 10:35 β€” πŸ‘ 59342    πŸ” 19008    πŸ’¬ 1612    πŸ“Œ 860

Well before β€˜Liberation Day’.

Papic and Saravelos are spot on.

14.04.2025 07:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

I wrote this note Thursday morning after watching the session in Asia on Wednesday. I truly believe it to be a major shift in attitude.

11.04.2025 19:57 β€” πŸ‘ 15    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 2
Post image

DUDLEY: β€œ.. The president’s attack on free trade is truly extraordinary in scope .. The impact will be devastating. Over the next six months, annualized inflation will likely climb to nearly 5%.” πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

@opinion.bloomberg.com
www.bloomberg.com/opinion/arti...

08.04.2025 05:13 β€” πŸ‘ 1340    πŸ” 418    πŸ’¬ 42    πŸ“Œ 23

@eaudemacro is following 20 prominent accounts