I think "idiosyncratic" is a bit generous.
02.03.2026 09:14 — 👍 14 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@davehone.bsky.social
Palaeontologist specialising in the behaviour of dinosaurs and biology of pterosaurs. Reader in Zoology @QMUL. Author of several books, podcaster, general sci-commer. Thoughts my own. He / him. davehone.co.uk
I think "idiosyncratic" is a bit generous.
02.03.2026 09:14 — 👍 14 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Has your height changed at all between papers? Could be a really fun one pager in the variation of Farke silhouettes.
26.02.2026 06:53 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Oh yes, they'd be fun to have back the next time we get some good flooding.
25.02.2026 20:22 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I have seen this and it is truly, monumentally, entertainingly, awful.
25.02.2026 20:20 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0And tigers. :)
25.02.2026 19:32 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0New episode of #TerribleLizards is out with @richardfallon.bsky.social talking about Crichton, Conan Doyle, and #dinosaurs in literature. terriblelizards.libsyn.com/tls12e02-1
25.02.2026 10:10 — 👍 33 🔁 10 💬 0 📌 1"Fruit synchronicity" would have been an interesting Police album.
23.02.2026 07:16 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0A perfectly reasonable response.
21.02.2026 20:33 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Yeah, he wrote to my university and told them they should withdraw my PhD. My crime was suggesting that rather than argue with me in the comments on my blog, he should submit his ideas in a paper for peer review.
21.02.2026 20:23 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 3 📌 0It's always been my biggest weakness. I do know a bit about Schroedinger's cat, but never got around to his Carnotaurus.
21.02.2026 20:14 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0He seems to have blocked me as I now can't see any of the preceding conversation. Obviously a class thing to slide into a conversation, suggest people are terrible at their work, and then preemptively block them.
21.02.2026 20:09 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0I mean, it's close enough in context given the absolute shoeing Wales have had in the last 2 weeks.
21.02.2026 19:57 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0This seems unfair, the others all go downhill.
21.02.2026 17:45 — 👍 47 🔁 6 💬 1 📌 1Called it.
21.02.2026 17:24 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Well England, for the second week running that was absolutely shocking.
21.02.2026 16:11 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0But are there long-horned and short-horned hornless horned dinosaurs? :D
20.02.2026 13:32 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I mean, it's literally the name we gave to another spinosaur species and based on the 'heron' model that Tom Holtz and I proposed, so pretty hard to claim it's an original quip.
20.02.2026 10:01 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Does that mean we can have short-tailed tailed tailless bats and long-tailed tailed tailless bats?
20.02.2026 09:51 — 👍 12 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Buried at the bottom, well below some chancer named Witton.
20.02.2026 08:39 — 👍 14 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0I've seen it pop up quite prominently on Reddit on threads about the new paper. So there are other people raising it.
20.02.2026 08:11 — 👍 15 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0I get a quote here on the new Spinosaurus paper in @newscientist.com www.newscientist.com/article/2516...
20.02.2026 08:10 — 👍 46 🔁 8 💬 2 📌 0Nah, we knew it was coming (and it gets a brief mention based on the SVP abstract since that was public knowledge). And IMO the only think really new here is the crest. After that there's a lot on signaling, wading and general stuff on their evolution, all things that are well established.
20.02.2026 08:07 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Why read one short paper on Spinosaurus when you can read an entire book?
19.02.2026 21:46 — 👍 53 🔁 4 💬 2 📌 0A "hell heron" eh? Wonder where they got that name from?
19.02.2026 19:56 — 👍 23 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Invade Greenland?
19.02.2026 13:41 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0In the UK at least, my set of four kids books on dinosaurs (of which I am very proud, I genuinely think these are excellent) is currently half price on Amazon!
19.02.2026 08:14 — 👍 18 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 0I do love Amargasaurus and that's a lovely rendition!
18.02.2026 11:34 — 👍 9 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I'm sure with enough time and money this is probably actually achievable (at least something genetically nearly identical could be made) but these timelines are obviously insane given the extraordinary number of major hurdles that need to be overcome.
18.02.2026 07:17 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It's in there. People have done late career shifts and worked independently - it is possible.
17.02.2026 19:36 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
"And there'll be one in ten years."
Does he want to bet on it? I'll even give him odds.
Provided of course it's not the bait-and-switch of 'we modified 5 genes and we call it a dire wolf and what is taxonomy anyway, so here's your resurrected species'.