PEQG website live! genetics-gsa.org/peqg-2026/
09.10.2025 16:08 โ ๐ 37 ๐ 22 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 1@yundeng.bsky.social
PEQG website live! genetics-gsa.org/peqg-2026/
09.10.2025 16:08 โ ๐ 37 ๐ 22 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 1Our latest work is out in Nature today. In this paper, we introduce an improved version of NanoSeq, a duplex sequencing protocol with <5 errors per billion bp in single DNA molecules, and use it to study the somatic mutation landscape of oral epithelium in >1000 people www.nature.com/articles/s41...
08.10.2025 16:30 โ ๐ 81 ๐ 44 ๐ฌ 5 ๐ 1Our paper (Brieuc Lehmann is the first author) is now online in Genetics.
academic.oup.com/genetics/adv...
Now published! Our paper on:
(1) Accurate sequencing of sperm at scale
(2) Positive selection of spermatogenesis driver mutations across the exome
(3) Offspring disease risks from male reproductive aging
[1/n]
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Excited to preprint our latest work (w/ Drew DeHaas, Zhibai Jia, Leo Speidel) on using ARGs for demographic inference. w/ applications using data from 1000 Genomes Project. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
08.10.2025 14:48 โ ๐ 45 ๐ 23 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I want to try something again at #ASHG25 this year: I'll block some time on Thursday and Friday afternoons to meet with trainees who would be interested to chat on any topic.
I did this last year and it was great to meet a whole bunch of new people, at all career stages!
Delighted that our paper about the distribution of genomic spans of clades/edges in genealogies (ARGs), and using this for detecting inversions and other SVs (and other phenomena that cause local disruption of recombination) is out in MBE academic.oup.com/mbe/article/... (1/n)
03.10.2025 09:54 โ ๐ 61 ๐ 37 ๐ฌ 4 ๐ 1We are excited to share GPN-Star, a cost-effective, biologically grounded genomic language modeling framework that achieves state-of-the-art performance across a wide range of variant effect prediction tasks relevant to human genetics.
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
(1/n)
Btw do you have any insights about the acceleration performance from SqS3 versus quasi-Newton updates? Is one of them significantly better than the other, or do they perform roughly equally well? Thanks!
12.09.2025 17:24 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0We did more comprehensive benchmark and expanded the empirical analysis for the first round, not so much for the following rounds. The methodology never changes throughout the revisions.
12.09.2025 17:21 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0SINGER is a fantastic method for ARG Inference and based on some of the analyses I've seen definitely the best trade off between accuracy and sample size
11.09.2025 04:23 โ ๐ 23 ๐ 8 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0SINGER, our ARG inference method, is finally published and freely available online:
doi.org/10.1038/s415...
It was a long journey โ 16 months from initial submission to acceptance. Is it just me, or has peer review gotten more arduous lately? 4+ rounds of review isn't so unusual these days...
Super useful insights! Thanks a lot!
10.09.2025 00:32 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Hi Arun, thanks for sharing this work! Any particular reason you performed acceleration on the EM updates rather than the quasi-Newton updates as ADMIXTURE does? Is it because the convergence is already fast with accelerated EM?
09.09.2025 19:06 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0