's Avatar

@amit-patel.bsky.social

33 Followers  |  58 Following  |  35 Posts  |  Joined: 15.11.2024  |  2.3085

Latest posts by amit-patel.bsky.social on Bluesky

Another jury sub-marines another DOJ case.

06.11.2025 23:09 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

But, does he have a building permit?

21.10.2025 12:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I could live with renaming it to the Obama/Biden Ballroom or the James Comey Dining Hall.

21.10.2025 02:27 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Bold move there at the end on rebuttal calling out the courts legitimacy...

16.10.2025 03:55 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"deferred." hmm. have they ever used that language in the past?

01.10.2025 15:23 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

*execution followed by a pardon.

26.09.2025 03:40 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Correct, pardoning his executioner.

21.09.2025 01:45 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

They weren't allowed to be here - Biden administration just didn't enforce the visa reqs.

15.09.2025 02:22 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You dont know about what you're talking. SK was in the wrong here. Don't be like a trumper - be better.

15.09.2025 02:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

No one's talking about the Epstein files now - are they? coincidence?

11.09.2025 18:26 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

In other shootings, the shooter wasnt two hundred yards away well beyond even the fringes of most security perimeters sans POTUS.

11.09.2025 03:29 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

No one's going to prison.

10.09.2025 02:47 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

a future (D) president should withhold congressionally appropriated funds allocated to pay for the security details of certain SCOTUS judges.

09.09.2025 21:58 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Pan says as much in her dissent.

29.08.2025 03:15 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Not enough do.

27.08.2025 22:01 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

one this should be clear by know, he knows his audience...

27.08.2025 15:26 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It's actually St. Eve Jobs.

29.07.2025 16:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

And he's 15.

28.07.2025 02:14 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Im voting for whomever pledges to publicly execute him. Torturing is a plus, but optional.

17.07.2025 20:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

doesn't "complete" relief necessarily mean a universal injunction in this context if say a child is born in one district which has blocked birthright citizenship but lives in another district that has not?

27.06.2025 14:39 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Survive the next 3.5 years, then address it head on with the full breadth of immunity now afforded a president - no room for the squmiesh b/c in this scenario its a full on purge.

08.06.2025 01:06 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Plaintiffs didn't have anything to appeal...how could they ask for something?

18.05.2025 01:40 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It's like he didn't even bother reading Bostock....

16.05.2025 18:30 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You're dumber than Trump if you actually believe the average American somehow now understands tariffs

16.05.2025 03:37 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Who's the third?

02.05.2025 01:43 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Or maybe ICE tried arrested them again?

26.04.2025 03:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Gott ist tott.

26.04.2025 02:36 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

This is simultaneously the grossest and most accurate ad I’ve ever seen.

#MAGABlowingYourTaxes

14.04.2025 20:11 β€” πŸ‘ 296    πŸ” 128    πŸ’¬ 19    πŸ“Œ 14

I have a better idea - Gov of Maryland should find a reason to detain Stephen Miller, throw him into a county jail, mysteriously lose him in the system and then offer to produce him in exchange for Garcia.

14.04.2025 22:57 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Follow-up: at what speed do you wager that SCOTUS will move when this matter reaches them a second time?

11.04.2025 21:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@amit-patel is following 20 prominent accounts