Neither numbers nor random ๐
10.10.2025 20:29 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@alastairw123.bsky.social
Neither numbers nor random ๐
10.10.2025 20:29 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Watts joules Seconds
10.10.2025 20:28 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0W = J / S
10.10.2025 19:06 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0whats a flyer ?
08.10.2025 21:00 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0First crack on a voi bike Not the perfect, first 2 I went 2, I unavailable, 1 couldnโt hire because of internal error
Fairly shoots off on first pedal, basket points forwards all the time Both a bit disconcerting first time
I think the idea of ETRO is you put in a change,folk comment based on experience in first 6 months So if it was decided to change to option 1 after 6 months, how would that work ?
01.09.2025 17:32 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Looks like it Apparently we can make comments now, but they just go on a big pile with those put in during the 6 months of consultation. Mind, I then get really confused about how โfalling back to option 1โ works in an ETRO.
01.09.2025 17:30 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0And yes, can have options, but with conditions ( I think) but the published diagrams donโt set those out ?
01.09.2025 13:21 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Re first point The councils webpage says it is open for comments So why does this contradict your explanation?
01.09.2025 13:19 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0hi... I'm trying to get answers to 2 questions (1) can an ETRO contain options (ie the modal filters OR protected lanes) ? a quick check via chatgpt suggests not, but I've only seen the diagrams and (2) the website does solicit feedback from the general public (as per pic)
01.09.2025 10:26 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0... unless they're a trip hazard !
27.08.2025 16:46 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@spokes.org.uk
Re roseburn tram design. The proposal sounds good, but I remain concerned that we get a โbalgreenโ type solution Ie segregated, etc, looks nice on paper, but you have to stop regularly to cross roads ( for roseburn thatโd be tram tracks) Is there a detailed design anywhere ?
๐จ ANNOUNCEMENT: UK Terror Threat Level RAISED.
๐๐ป Please watch this #MondayMorning edition of #BrokenNews and repost it using the hashtag #BrokenNews.
youtu.be/8vE1tvIwXaM
And oddly, corners of Facebook believe they are puppets of the evil cycling sustrans
15.08.2025 20:55 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I think this is the legislation www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1999/61.... A quick search suggests no references to cost/budget/timescales; therefore (being simplistic) that's all outwith statutory scope & therefore outwith ToR for sub-committee.
14.08.2025 11:57 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0understand... but is the timing within scope of 'statutory part' of TROs ? if not, shouldn't the chair move discussion on (or have a vote) ?
14.08.2025 11:50 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0sorry...I was tripping over you with my extra notes :-)
14.08.2025 11:46 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0My reading of the ToR for Sub-committee suggests that funding/pacing of replacement is out-of-scope for the sub-committee (its outwith the statutory element of TROs). Anybody know if that's right ? and if-so, why did the chair not step in ?
14.08.2025 11:44 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Aug mtg had same report input. My understanding is that only the trip hazard objection was contentious, and officals verbally said that permanent infra would slowly replace over time. Cllr Lang's issue is whether there's budget (etc) to do that replacement. And seemingly no progress made in Aug
14.08.2025 11:41 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0I'm trying to get my head round how TROs & sub-comm works, using this example. Its quasi-judical, and is there to respond to consultations & approve. For this one there were 34 objections, of which 7 were trip hazards. Officials were inclined to ignore; but discussion carried from May mtg to Aug
14.08.2025 11:38 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0It could be that cycle lane is under an existing etro When it expires, the cycle lanes go So this one then implements the no waiting?
12.08.2025 19:28 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Double checked this am and road not fixed
09.08.2025 10:42 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0How reliable do you think the dates are ? 3 weeks ago I took this copy, after the end date shown for work. Itโs disappeared and I donโt think work done ( been away for a week and not checked)
09.08.2025 06:17 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0As I think I said ( stuffs a bit blurry) in Richmond, that is a fantastic looking bike
06.08.2025 17:15 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Iโm on Orkney Thereโs signs about reporting stoats, and stoat traps, everywhere Apparently ( according to my wife) they arrived here on boats, as stoataways
27.06.2025 17:50 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0From about half a km from your route
13.06.2025 18:42 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0i'll drink to that
13.06.2025 10:55 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I've got 2 lists from recent TEC (democracy.edinburgh.gov.uk/documents/s8... and democracy.edinburgh.gov.uk/documents/s7...) but these seem incomplete, and wonder if you understand it better than me
09.06.2025 14:30 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0โช@merchistoncc.bsky.socialโฌ โช@longstonecc.bsky.socialโฌ would either of you be available for a chat about how CEC (1) puts roads onto repair/improvement lists and (2) track when it will get done ?
09.06.2025 14:29 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Scafells good, but is it Blackford Hill good ?
04.06.2025 21:15 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0