Personally, a lot of the times I donβt even think
10.10.2025 19:40 β π 10 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0@felipefv.bsky.social
PhD researcher @UGent | https://felipelfv.github.io | I like statistics, psychometrics, and metascience sometimes; pasta and ice cream, always | Donate to lavaan: https://lavaan.ugent.be/
Personally, a lot of the times I donβt even think
10.10.2025 19:40 β π 10 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0And then someone tells you about randomised non-comparative trial
04.10.2025 14:08 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The authors probably donβt understand the derivation either & asked a bot too π
03.10.2025 17:07 β π 38 π 10 π¬ 1 π 1Indeed, there are always better ways to say something. The thing is that a course on causal inference can go into many different directions. Part of the causal inference literature is hard to follow imo, but there are definitely many concepts that can be learned and useful without those 5 years
19.09.2025 18:41 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Well well well: www.cambridge.org/core/books/e...
19.09.2025 15:52 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0rixpress is now an @ropensci.org package!
Link: docs.ropensci.org/rixpress/
Whoaβmy book is up for pre-order!
ππ¨πππ₯ ππ¨ ππππ§π’π§π : ππ¨π° ππ¨ ππ§πππ«π©π«ππ ππππ & ππ ππ¨πππ₯π¬ π’π§ #Rstats ππ§π #PyData
The book presents an ultra-simple and powerful workflow to make sense of Β± any model you fit
The web version will stay free forever and my proceeds go to charity.
tinyurl.com/4fk56fc8
And hopefully no rethinking my rethinking π
11.09.2025 10:51 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Rethinking measurement invariance causally Highlights: It is preferable to work with a causal definition of measurement invariance A violation of measurement invariance is a potentially substantively interesting observation Standard tests for measurement invariance rely on strong assumptions Group differences can be thought of as descriptive results
Conceptual graph illustration the central points of the manuscript. A group variable is potentiall connected to a construct of interest which affects items. Measurement invariance is violated if the group variable directly affects the items, for example by modifying the loadings from the construct to the items, or by directly affecting an item
To make this less abstract, consider a scenario where students take an exam, R, meant to capture some ability, T, and then are admitted to a program, V, depending on their exam results: Rβ―ββ―V. This is sufficient to result in a violation of the statistical definition of measurement invariance. Exam results and admission are not independent given ability because exam results have a direct effect on admission. Even if we know somebodyβs ability (e.g., we know itβs very high), learning about their admission status (e.g., they were not admitted) can tell us something about their exam result (e.g., it may have been worse than expected). According to the causal definition, this in itself does not constitute measurement bias, which seems a sensible conclusion here. After all, the scenario does not involve any reason to believe that the measurement process varied systematically by admission status. Admission happens after the exams took place, it cannot retroactively influence the measurement process (and, for example, lead to unfair treatment depending on admission status).
New paper out with @boryslaw.bsky.social π₯³ In which we sketch out how to rethink measurement invariance causally for applied researchers. And provide a causal definition of measurement invariance!
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Wwuuuuuuut
11.09.2025 10:10 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The authors "conclude that psychometric standards must be sufficiently rigorous to distinguish genuine constructs and associations from methodological artifacts that can otherwise pose a serious validity threat." Which sounds great, but is typically *impossible* to achieve in psychology
1/5
Luc is also currently working on this package that will give you (not only) tikz-based diagrams. Still very early on, but something to look forward to!
25.08.2025 19:34 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0#statstab #405 Best Practices for Estimating, Interpreting, and
Presenting Nonlinear Interaction Effects
Thoughts: Guidance on nonlinear interactions, reporting (probabilities) and visualisations.
#probit #logit #logisticregression #nonlinear #guide
sociologicalscience.com/download/vol...
The thing with dating apps is that it is literally like getting a job: it doesnβt work until it works
15.08.2025 19:37 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Fair coins tend to land on the same side they started: evidence from 350,757 flips. 
That's the title of our paper summarizing ~650 hours of coin-tossing experimentation just published in the Journal of the American Statistical Association.
doi.org/10.1080/0162...
We're happy to share the main talks for the Shiny in Production Conference 2025!
This year's lineup includes some great talks on using Shiny in real-world projects, from building apps to scaling them in production.
Looking forward to seeing everyone there!
#ShinyInProduction #RStats #DataScience
It was so so good to work with Monash Uni students on their first steps in C++ programming for R applications! πβ¨ They made it! And now, they're ready to code! π€πΎ
arp.numbat.space/week11/
#rstats #rcpp #armadillo
I used to do that during my bachelors and (less but still) masters. That habit got me in touch with my previous internship supervisor. It also allowed me to exchange a few emails with cool people, like Yalom, and it is also how I got in touch with my phd supervisor
24.05.2025 15:10 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0PhD fellowship to work with me and Benedetta Franceschiello on the analysis and modelling of fast sampled fMRI data!
www.ugent.be/en/work/scie...
The landing page of the course "ggplot2 uncharted" with the title teasing it with "Master Data Visualizations with ggplot2".
Excited to launch "ggplot2 [un]charted" with @yan-holtz.bsky.social! π
An online course to master #ggplot2 with exercises, quizzes, and modulesβand hands-on code running in your browser!
Still WIPβsign up now for a limited discount:
π www.ggplot2-uncharted.com
#rstats #DataViz #DataVisualization
Mastering typefaces and fonts in #rstats has always been harder than it should. 
I have tried to collect much of my relevant knowledge in this deep-dive blog post so you can spend your time picking the right typeface instead of cursing at the computer
Every month you get a "Bad stats" article as part of Significance. This month we have something on randomised non-comparative trial (RNCT): academic.oup.com/jrssig/artic...
10.05.2025 15:51 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Very beautiful moment tbh
10.05.2025 12:05 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Not-so-modest shoutout to our own paper on interactions in which we discuss both issues β scale dependence and confounding π journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
10.05.2025 10:21 β π 46 π 11 π¬ 2 π 0Omg, I recently had a chat with LLM about this and out of nowhere it finished with a quote (and more) from Alfred Korzybski: "The map is not the territory β the scale you choose shapes what you see"
10.05.2025 12:03 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Also note that "removable" here is a mathematical term: an interaction is removable if we can nullify it with a monotonic transformation. But just because an interaction is "removable" doesn't mean it isn't substantial!
10.05.2025 11:48 β π 4 π 1 π¬ 2 π 0Oh, completely missed that reply. Thanks!
09.05.2025 15:27 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0