You’re in pretty good shape
For the shape that you’re in
— Dr. Seuss
@bahome.bsky.social
Professor, personal account. Genetics, genomics, brain development, other stuff. Typo-prone. If you’re nice I’ll post dog photos. If you click the Starter Packs tab below you’ll find two I made for genetics and genomics accounts.
You’re in pretty good shape
For the shape that you’re in
— Dr. Seuss
Well played, Spelling Bee. Well played.
06.12.2025 17:52 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0OK, we can get some fish tacos and make a corona disappear when you get back.
05.12.2025 00:59 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Pro-tip: check your inbox before you send that follow up email.
04.12.2025 18:07 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Your record swim across the Yangtze will never be equaled.
03.12.2025 04:23 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0We are in awe that you also did not allow a single hurricane to land this season
03.12.2025 03:23 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0This online seminar on GenAI is struggling with Zoom.
02.12.2025 20:43 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Gift link for NY Times article on cuts at NIH and NSF:
www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
Kids Can Press company logo and logo and image of Franklin character with statement text,”Franklin the Turtle is a beloved Canadian icon who has inspired generations of children and stands for kindness, empathy, and inclusivity. We strongly condemn any denigrating, violent, or unauthorized use of Franklin’s name or image, which directly contradicts these values.”
01.12.2025 23:18 — 👍 15130 🔁 4071 💬 1 📌 675Screenshot of New York Times post, “If the thought of installing a smart lock intimidates you, don’t be.”
Grammar are for chumps, I supposes.
01.12.2025 19:02 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The arc of the moral universe, unable to bend, is seeking a referral to metaphysical therapy and hoping insurance will cover it.
01.12.2025 04:38 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Hot darn!
29.11.2025 05:29 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Have I been good @profanity.accountant ?
29.11.2025 03:59 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The longer you’ve been at it the more magical this seems.
27.11.2025 16:51 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I am thankful for gene synthesis, hi-fi assembly, and inexpensive whole-plasmid sequencing.
27.11.2025 16:26 — 👍 18 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 2Typo of the day:
“pot-baccalaureate program”
I mean, Steve Gadd’s chart on the title track is still amazing.
26.11.2025 19:08 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0One month later and those 30 billion base pairs are crammed into just about 14 chromosomes. HOT DANG! This seemed impossible 4-5 years ago.
26.11.2025 15:58 — 👍 39 🔁 5 💬 3 📌 0Always write for your audience, not for numbers of writing units submitted.
25.11.2025 17:37 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Self evident truths. Fight for them!
25.11.2025 04:06 — 👍 6 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 0Open faculty position (Assistant or Associate) in UW Medical Genetics. As you might expect, faculty often end up also interacting with Genome Sciences, so we're hoping for some great prospects! Note the clinical requirements for the position. apply.interfolio.com/176466
24.11.2025 19:23 — 👍 19 🔁 30 💬 0 📌 0Partisan mood affiliation has led some people to take the stance that AI and robotics and biotech are no big deal and our lives will go on largely unaffected, or that they are all bad and we should simply resist. I’d much rather have those people thinking carefully about the big changes to come.
24.11.2025 20:26 — 👍 53 🔁 4 💬 2 📌 0I had to look up the term and now I’m sorry I did.
22.11.2025 22:27 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0A REAL PHAGE TURNER
Great work in Nat Comm from the UC San Diego laboratories of David Pride and Justin Meyer—experimental evolution of bacteriophage to successfully expand their host range against MDR strains of the critical threat pathogen Klebsiella pneumoniae.
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
It’s not dogma or orthodoxy it is actual science. I can’t take it with you guys
21.11.2025 23:48 — 👍 29 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0A microscope on the left, an identical one on the right except that it's glowing green. The left is captioned "Fluoresence Microscope", the right "Flueorescent microcscope"
Know the difference.
19.11.2025 22:08 — 👍 140 🔁 31 💬 3 📌 2Calling something "scientific orthodoxy" rather than "established fact" or even "scientific consensus" is so incredibly damaging.
21.11.2025 19:05 — 👍 698 🔁 86 💬 8 📌 3