No, sadly itβs always been here.
19.08.2025 23:55 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@brihard.bsky.social
Did a bit of CAF stuff, did a bit of school stuff (and going back for more), trying to keep up with global and national events. Interests in law, public safety, IR, and natsec.
No, sadly itβs always been here.
19.08.2025 23:55 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0CAF does have the CFNCIU that will work extremism files, but I imagine they have a lot on their plate. Itβs easy when idiots toss a Nazi salute at a party on video, but a lot likely manage to fly under the radar- probably the more potentially dangerous ones.
19.08.2025 23:55 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0This will be one where, I think, the legal authorities and positions of the parties will matter less than their respective political power and resolve. CUPE is more equipped than most to stick to its metaphorical guns here. Nobodyβs wallet wins a protracted legal fight (except Westjet and Porter?)
18.08.2025 15:16 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0This morningβs order of the strike as illegal was signed by a vice chair, so they at least appear live to the perceived conflict. From discussions I had with a labour law guy over at The Other Place, sounds like the CIRB approval of 107 is a rubber stamp. But she should stay out of it from here.
18.08.2025 15:04 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0(left)
15.05.2025 19:32 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0His legal training and graduate education certainly adds value. Anything in particular from his background that would specifically speak to the NS space such that he would jump out for NSICOP generally or chair specifically?
14.05.2025 03:02 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0They could model legislation off ours in this case. Our Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act allows domestic prosecution if: Cdn accused OR Cdn victim OR accused later enters Canada. It domestically criminalizes Rome Statute offences and any offences under customary IHL. Actually a robust law.
14.05.2025 02:53 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Dammit, I came here to say this.
14.05.2025 02:46 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Iβm literally supposed to be balancing work and grad school and a kid this year and they go and do this!?
03.05.2025 22:22 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Oh man I forgot this meme. I loved it the first time I saw it.
03.05.2025 16:01 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I like it. Seems like heβs here to calmly and maturely govern. He has shit to do and doesnβt want to get dragged into nonsense, nor put up with it from others. Boring and competent is good.
02.05.2025 19:44 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0And you just know that an intended next step is revocation of and retroactive disqualification for birthright citizenship to any minors, born in the U.S. to non-citizens, who have been removed with their parents.
28.04.2025 14:50 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I feel like itβs only a matter of time before they start demanding we de-list Proud Boys and the Threepersβ¦
24.04.2025 13:42 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0At this point it would just be GoTβs The Red Wedding dubbed over with new audio.
24.04.2025 10:55 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Rookie numbers. You gotta *work* to earn those sanctions.
23.04.2025 20:08 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I am shocked and in denial.
20.04.2025 16:05 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Thereβs a name I havenβt seen in a while! And yeah- instructing should be career advancing. βShe/he is worthy of teaching the next generation.β Not βWho can we dump on the school.β Trick would be doing this without it just becoming a box tick for regimental favourites.
20.04.2025 16:05 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Ok- so if that is in fact a new problem and it fundamentally changes the math on PRs, fair enough. Scrap the initiative. I think I started out (maybe a different reply) saying itβs numerically insignificant anyway.
How does the U.S. do it for green card holders?
Addendum: or that those units will never actually hold or use kit with that degree of control?
20.04.2025 15:43 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Right. But in the context of PRes combat arms in the domestic context, and what they actually hold and use, is this actually a problem with current or incoming systems? Is this an obstacle to recruiting PRs as, say, PRes Inf, knowing most will never actually need a Secret clearance anyway?
20.04.2025 15:22 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0With equal respect, for a decade and a half I used, and at a very basic level taught other reservists to use, the 521 and 522 radios. I only had ERS for the first three years, and thatβs all most of my troops ever had. Most reservists donβt get Lvl II clearances but are able to use basic comms kit.
20.04.2025 13:54 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yes, at enhanced reliability level absolutely. Simply possessing and using the regular tactical radios isnβt a barrier. The maintenance and crypto stuff that enters into the classified realm is a bit farther along. I was only ever a PRes dude who ate crayons; no clearance (Secret) til I deployed.
20.04.2025 13:48 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0No but fighter jets and artillery and subs, or videos of troops jumping out of a chinook, a RHIB full of boarding party, or SARTECHs jumping out of a Herc is a tangible βooh letβs buy more of that!β The public can sorta wrap their heads around it a bit more.
20.04.2025 13:45 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The real challenge seems to be recruiting (and retaining!) more technical skills that enable the rest of the force. Lifestyle is a more compelling issue after the first few years, when βwhat do I want to be when I grow up?β sets in. Retention and recruiting must be addressed hand in hand. 2/2
20.04.2025 13:42 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0*Super* hard, but yes what you say is true to greater or lesser extents. Easy to be geographically static as an Inf NCM or a naval tech; harder as a LogO or Sigs NCO. But attracting kids to an initial stint for the βfunβ army stuff isnβt too hard. Issue is process more than lack of applicants. 1/
20.04.2025 13:40 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Easy enough to fill spots in reserve combat arms units that only need enhanced reliability. Can still train (and facilitate training), and deploy on DOMOPS. Most reservists only get an actual clearance if deploying. Tougher to use them in the RegF if lack of citizenship precludes clearance.
20.04.2025 13:36 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Agreed. The hiring is absurdly slow. My original point was simply that increased hiring necessitates increased DP1 throughput. That in turn means much more demand on NCOs and training support staff. Itβs a zero-sum game; other things will need to slow down pending realization of trained growth.
20.04.2025 04:26 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The PR enrollment, so far as I can tell, is numerically irrelevant. It shouldnβt matter; CAF has all the raw material to be an easy sell if the kit is decent, training meaningful, and thereβs a reasonably decent climate without an excess of utter chickenshit. Recruiting shouldnβt be super hard.
20.04.2025 03:13 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0NATSEC at the nitty gritty level isnβt politically sexy. Relatively nobody wants to hear about foreign collection of HUMINT, or the Canada Evidence Act, or foreign agent registration etc. Itβs poor fodder for a punchy election platform.
20.04.2025 03:03 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Not sure thereβs a way around that when CAF needs to interoperate I. Classified environments and clearances to agreed upon allied standards are required.
20.04.2025 02:59 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0