paddyor.bsky.social

Actually they changed that. It’s now away team that changes strip. So yeah he’s right.

Its's owned by part of the british govt iirc. Or was and that was a problem at one point.

What are you talking about?

The kiwis are perfectly capable of cash grabs without the aid of PE tbf.

He’s the guy who sank the titanic in o kill opponents of the fed. Everyone knows that guy.

Wagner thought he was a wanker and Nietzsche found out?

That’s a girls name, means freedom and I’ll guess a hard left Irish republican/nationalist. So this is fairly par.

Best to start cutting down on the appliances now.

Same

It’s not a great venue for a rugby match. Pitch is a bit lost in it, very far from the action.

Disposable vapes apparently cost more in italy

The shipping containers on derelict sites in 1 were a pretty big tell (which I ignored)

It’s 30 full games so not all.

In the case of Irish players the union owns their image rights. So they can’t advertise for a sponsors competitor.

Sent a mail about it last night.

WHo could forget the "accidnental landlord" sob stories of the early 10s. Like fucking hell the past is another country.

The other thing is homeowners are a permanent constituecy and people agitated by the housing crisis are not.

Claiming it’s a had a huge negative effect on growth is vibes. Always struck me as wish casting when McWilliams’s first started saying it 6 or 7 years ago.

They’re not meant to be solutions to the root of the problem. They’re meant to ameliorate the worst of the conditions for as many people as possible and they do that. Like if you don’t do HAP how exactly are you going to house those people?

Oh vibes. Well then.

By the housing crisis are not.

The only thing that will materially change house and rent prices is supply. But you can still materially change people’s circumstances and it’s not all bad.

Surely you know someone who benefited from RPZs, HAP, low cost rental, first buyer, tenant in situ and even part 4 -and part 4 tenancies? Anyway the point is even a moderately successful housing policy will ensure that homeowners remain a permanent constituency in a way that the lose affected by 1/

Huge how? Like economic indicators have been pretty strong for about a decade Covid excepted. And even there the economy bounced back. People still have plenty of money to go on holiday or drop 300 for oasis. But if you think that then you also think RPZs, first time buyer schemes are a big help too

I don’t think it is badly affecting the economy which doesn’t mean it’s not bad just not in that way.

The other thing which people seem to ignore, is the measures taken by the govt will reduce those affected YOY (and have done for the guts of a decade) those affected by the housing crisis.

Don’t know how to say zed

It rarely accomplishes anything resembling an end goal of the perpetrators, usually quite the opposite(Caesar, Franz Ferdinand Lincoln)

Needs an IV drip

The fantasy is they explode ushering in a “moderate” con govt as a corrective I guess.

Seizing 10% of a company seems like a wealth tax tbh

Is that the one that ripped off the plot of deep blue sea?

The walkman clipping is a stone cold suicide. Even with noise cancelling you'd feel the train approaching.