void

The world is crumbling, but Piers Morgan is still on the holy quest of figuring out if a women can have a penis.

Federal Judges, Warning of ‘Judicial Crisis,’ Fault Supreme Court’s Emergency Orders

It's official:

-2025 is now a more threatening year for the survival of the republic than 1968.

-John Roberts will now go down in history as a worse chief justice than Roger "Dred Scott" Taney.

www.nytimes.com/2025/10/11/u...

I've bookmarked this in case, somebody from MAGA will claim they don't mean "anti-fascism" when they say "antifa".

Who said "attack"?

So, which generation of US citizens is an immigrant that became a citizen?

You mean an immigrant cannot be an US citizen?
Or do you mean they are 0th generation citizens?

Majority of Russia are pro-Putin. But the vast majority of Russians who left Russia are anti-Putin (and anti war). I think there are tons of facts if you want to see them. But Russians cannot publicly discuss them, because it unnecessary increases individual risks (you can do stuff, but don't speak)

bsky is not the best place to discuss this. Can we have a discord conversation or something? I'll try to elaborate.

Do they also vote against Putin, while secretly supporting him?

On your questions:
* Pretty much, yes.
* Mostly by sending money to Ukraine. Some do much more, but an average person would not take so much risk, so only money and secretly.

To make sure I understand correctly:
An ordinary Russian person, who just sleeps, works, and go back to family at home, would as a hobby somehow haunt down Russian special agents and overpower them to kill them?

You mean "polls lie" or who?

I think an average anti-Putin Russian does much more to help Ukraine than an average European.

But EU can do whatever it wants.

"go" how?

I thought we do need anti-Putin influence inside Europe.

This argument is very different argument. And is a much more understandable one.

I believe Putin lied about the reasons to invade Ukraine: he does not care about Russian speaking people at all. But ultimately in the shoes of Baltic countries I'd also be extra cautious about Russians (other reasons)

Well. "Truth does not exist, there are only opinions" is what Kremlin propaganda likes to push. Personally I prefer to think we can generally check if a claim is correct (or we should avoid making the claim, if we cannot check it).

With Putin support we can easily look at polls and votes.

What would be the objective way to check who is right?

From the europe community on Reddit: Exit Poll % for Putin among Russians in Europe (and some other places) Explore this post and more from the europe community

P.S.: Just random google search:
www.reddit.com/r/europe/com...

I'm not a westerner. I'm a Russian in immigration myself. And from what I've seen whatever Russian-speaking community you enter, you'll almost never find even a single Putin supporter.

I agree with this. But this is a completely different argument from accusing those who are likely victims of being the aggressors.

Those likely were anti-Putin people. Otherwise they likely would've stayed in Russia.

It's pretty hard to prove these claims. I believe being non-critical is the role of MAGA. We should be better than that and use better standards of evidences.

Um, yeah, it's happening...
🎁🔗
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...

Yeah, the "give me a peace prize or I shoot you" kind of a situation here.

<looking at the "Reform UK" bar>

As a resident of Ireland, I'm afraid of the UK as the neighbor.

Just remembered this jaw-dropping graph by @oceansclimatecu.bsky.social showing the rate of change in CO2 during the previous two deglaciations of the Pleistocene (which, as a fun aside, featured ~400 feet of sea level rise) as compared with today

Every single time...

Stop posting this stupid image.

1917: Ottoman empire and then British mandate
1946: still British mandate
1947: the first time the creation of Palestine was on the table, Israeli agreed but Palestinians rejected the plan.
1948: Arabs attacked Israel, lost the war and territory
<etc; text limit>

I think this is the first comment that I've seen from Joe Walsh that conveys a wrong message.

Indeed, Palestinians & Arab countries do need to acknowledge Israel.
But at the same time Israel must stop the settlers program, inhumane treatment of Gaza and so on.

> Right now? a LOT of bullish directional risk is being taken (everyone is long!)

I don't get it. Why are they doing that?