Do you have some kind of public embarrassment kink you’re working on or something? What is this?
24.11.2025 03:26 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@wheystandard.bsky.social
Cornell Law ‘14. Financial regulation, law, politics, България, and now featuring fatherhood.
Do you have some kind of public embarrassment kink you’re working on or something? What is this?
24.11.2025 03:26 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0“Why marry a woman, make her work for someone else” indeed. Treating your wife as a slave you can rent out would definitely be a problem.
24.11.2025 03:20 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Flantastic @scaniam67.bsky.social Follow No. You fail. You were given the opportunity to read and you failed. One person stated that we should look up the definition of socialism, and the followup was a dipshit meme that didn't define it. You fail, sir. You have shown yourself to be incompetent or illiterate. I don't care which. Nov 23, 2025 at 12:10 AM 1 quote 2 ฿ 1 ① ...
Hell, technically you posted this today! You were literally complaining that he “didn’t define it”. Not that he defined it inaccurately, but that he didn’t define it. Which he didn’t, and he was not asked to do.
24.11.2025 03:01 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0“Socialism is a scare word [Republicans] have hurled at every advance the people have made in the last 20 years.” Is not an attempt to define socialism, a thing you understood yesterday when you complained that he didn’t provide a definition of socialism.
24.11.2025 02:57 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Your dumbass position has gone from “he was asked to provide a definition but didn’t” to “I think stuff like “Socialism is a scare word [Republicans] have hurled at every advance the people have made in the last 20 years” is meant as a definition of socialism, but is inaccurate”?
24.11.2025 02:29 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0None were listed. That was literally your complaint, that Gary didn’t provide a definition (which is true, he did not, nor did he try to, nor was he asked to). Now your position is he did provide a definition, but it was wrong?
24.11.2025 02:27 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Neither of those posts imply that any definition of socialism previously provided in the thread is wrong, because no definition of socialism had been provided. Seek psychiatric help.
24.11.2025 02:23 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Patricia @pattidezgn4u.bsky.social • 17h I refuse to endorse Socialism. You may want to research what Socialism is ffs. 6 ①1 ① • ..
garybutler.bsky.social @garybutler... • 17h Bluesky Elder "Socialism is a scare word [Republicans] have hurled at every advance the people have made in the last 20 years. Socialism is what they called public power. Socialism is what they called social security. Socialism is what they called farm price supports. Socialism is what they called bank deposit insurance. Socialism is what they called the growth of free and independent labor organizations. Socialism is their name for almost anything that helps all the people. When the Republican candidate inscribes the slogan 'Down With Socialism' on the banner of his 'great crusade,' that is really not what he means at all. What he really means is, 'Down with Progress - down with Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal,' and 'down with Harry Truman's Fair Deal.' That is what he means" - Harry Truman • 1 0 1 Flantastic @scaniam67.bsky.social • 16h ...
Oh, “the comment”? Here are the two posts I addressed in my post that you replied to about “the implication”. Which one of these were you claiming that “the implication” of was that the definition of socialism was wrong?
24.11.2025 02:15 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The implication of what? What are you even responding to in what I said?
24.11.2025 02:08 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0No, it was asking them to research what socialism is, and they replied with a meme of a bunch of things they think socialism is. You’re welcome to ignore the words and live in your fantasyland where they were replying to a post asking for a definition, but it won’t change the words in the post.
24.11.2025 02:02 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0No, the response was a bunch of things socialism is to them. In response to a request to research what socialism is. Nobody asked for a definition, and nobody gave a definition, as I pointed out, and this upset you, and so you had a meltdown.
23.11.2025 22:13 — 👍 11 🔁 0 💬 3 📌 0You know everyone can go read it, right?
23.11.2025 18:38 — 👍 10 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It’s exactly what was said, bud.
23.11.2025 18:15 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0They could have ended this whole thing 3 months ago, claimed a victory of him being removed, and most Americans would have assumed yes, the admin won.
But being cruel was more important to them.
Patricia told people to research what socialism is, a Gary replied with an image macro of a bunch of things he believes socialism is. Nobody asked for a definition.
23.11.2025 13:45 — 👍 11 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Literally no one in the thread told anyone to “look up the definition of socialism”, this person is insane.
23.11.2025 12:46 — 👍 22 🔁 1 💬 4 📌 0And nothing says “leftist” like … aggies
23.11.2025 03:56 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Man, wait till he sees DSO in the oilfield services sector. I’ve seen guys with Chevron invoices pushing 150 days.
23.11.2025 03:19 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Some of my favorite George Carlin bits revolve around this exact sentiment.
23.11.2025 02:23 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Mine is still going strong 8 years later, only replaced the drum once.
23.11.2025 02:16 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Brazil and Mexico are federal republics not because they call themselves that, but because that’s an accurate description of their structures. Idk why Tom’s convinced that who elects the federal government is essential to federalism but the simple reality is isn’t, that’s not what federalism means.
23.11.2025 02:02 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The real issue is I never said that we should be more like Brazil and Mexico, I just pointed out that they are also federal republics and have a national popular vote for president, because who selects the federal government leaders isn’t actually a defining feature of federalism.
23.11.2025 01:48 — 👍 21 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 1Who made that argument, Tom? The straw man you have to fight because you can’t address what I actually said?
23.11.2025 01:42 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Also I feel pretty confident that fornication was a crime in Virginia in 1776 and 1789 (when he actually would’ve been having sex with his child slave in America).
23.11.2025 01:16 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0every single baby had to be
hospitalized.
They could have ended this whole thing 3 months ago, claimed a victory of him being removed, and most Americans would have assumed yes, the admin won.
But being cruel was more important to them.
Ken Klippenstein @kenklippenstein... • 19h Bluesky Elder Hakeem Jeffries was literally voting for a resolution condemning socialism while this meeting was taking place
Patricia @pattidezgn4u.bsky.social • 17h I refuse to endorse Socialism. You may want to research what Socialism is ffs.
garybutler.bsky.social @garybutler... • 17h Bluesky Elder "Socialism is a scare word [Republicans] have hurled at every advance the people have made in the last 20 years. Socialism is what they called public power. Socialism is what they called social security. Socialism is what they called farm price supports. Socialism is what they called bank deposit insurance. Socialism is what they called the growth of free and independent labor organizations. Socialism is their name for almost anything that helps all the people. When the Republican candidate inscribes the slogan
There are three posts in the thread above the one where you inexplicably bitch about one of them not containing a definition. Here they all are below. Which one is your illiterate ass claiming says anything about a “definition”? Ken’s, Patricia’s, or Gary’s?
22.11.2025 18:02 — 👍 9 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Yes, I should have just said “you’re the first one to bring up definitions, dipshit”
22.11.2025 13:33 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0