Ecomp

If you have acid reflux, it's because you're not swallowing pills with water. Had unexplained acid reflux for like 8 years. Started taking water with my pills and now no more acid reflux. It's a common side effect and can also cause ulcers.

You were never like this before

Landlord removed the black mold and now I'm not funny

Etch a sketch suicide note

Guy on the left needs a couple more lbs of facial piercings and he looks just like you

My joke was going to be "adding the youtube vids about dinosaurs that I watch to my goodreads account"

After a conversation, I decided that listening can be considered reading, too. Apologies for my snark.

February reading or February listening?

I follow you in spite of any of your posts

Just ratio'd a Youtube short

Money is fake but important. Like many other social constructs. Care has to be taken in dismantling or reforming social systems after careful analysis. You're not the one with the answers.

If you look up clips of Fight Corp by Erik Skog, that's a good one, still in development tho

Neither would I, but it's the most "multiple-heights" example I can think of.

Wind Waker is the closest I can think of

Even then, if I find out I can haunt you, I will

Not until I die

Those are me

We can start one

Cultivating livestock is explicitly NOT the hunter-gatherer lifestyle. What you need is a spear and a woven basket to pick some berries.

patrick star from spongebob squarepants is sitting on a couch with his mouth open Alt: patrick star from spongebob squarepants is sitting on a couch and snoring

Tundra areas in gaming

Crusader Kings 3

You still pop up

The people who call them "workers" are not doing so with a marxist analysis in mind. 'They did a job so they're proletariat' is a stupid qualifier. Weavers and textile manufacturers of the time were guild artisans, through and through. They were trying to avoid becoming workers. They're reactionary.

"Spending taxes" as a shorthand. Of course taxes aren't actually ever spent.

Yeah, that's a practical consequence. The argument is that having "risk as a job" is unethical, especially when the state props you up by spending taxes again sourced from the workers. The risk is also availed to workers before owners always. The worker loses their livelihood before the owner does.

The only reason they have any control over the profit is because they are backed by a state. Profit collected by an owner who provides no input into the production process is rent from the workers. Companies aren't tangible things, those profits are controlled and owned by people.

The guild artisans of the early 1800s do check these boxes.

Here's the quote

You're the one making an oversimplification. Any analysis of 18th century guild artisans would not place them as proletariat. The communist manifesto itself describes artisans as conservatives and reactionaries, only revolutionary by chance because they realize they're about to become proletariat.

What do you think petit bourgeois are