Mike Simonsen's Avatar

Mike Simonsen

@mikesimonsen.bsky.social

I help people understand the housing market. Now: Chief Economist, Compass. Prev: Founder CEO Altos Research (acq by HWMedia)

2,864 Followers  |  190 Following  |  735 Posts  |  Joined: 10.05.2023  |  2.1378

Latest posts by mikesimonsen.bsky.social on Bluesky

Post image

Maryland is just playing catch up!

03.10.2025 00:10 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Doing some work with the Compass data team today. Thought this looked cool

02.10.2025 19:55 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Looking at the MBA purchase mortgage applications on a 13-week rolling average really highlights the current trend

01.10.2025 18:25 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Such excellent insight and a fascinating story!

01.10.2025 14:51 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Existing home sales are inching above last year as reported by NAR.

In our weekly pending contracts, the slight growth over 2024 continues.

Last year the brief mortgage rate dip to 6.1% in September lifted the sales rate for Q4. Will be interesting if we can beat that this year.

25.09.2025 18:29 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Interesting that LA is less affordable than SF in your set. Is that because LA renters have significantly lower income?

24.09.2025 14:27 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

New home sales big print feels like survey noise to me. What would be the sudden catalyst?

Existing Home Sales tomorrow from NAR should show YoY gains but nothing in the real-time data says massive shift.

24.09.2025 14:24 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Some millennial will thank you for the infill opportunity.

24.09.2025 14:05 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

An interesting comment @mikesimonsen.bsky.social made in his weekly housing video for Compass this week is the sellers withdrawing listings aren’t those with tons of equity, it’s ones who bought more recently who don’t have that equity cushion and can’t afford to take a lower asking price.

24.09.2025 13:55 β€” πŸ‘ 38    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
Unaffordable by Design: What’s Next for America’s Intractable Housing Crisis? An exclusive dive into the roots of America’s housing affordability crisis β€” revealing how we got here and what it will take to chart a new path forward.

If you’d like to read more detail, I authored this Report in May:

www.housingwire.com/articles/una...

23.09.2025 15:12 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

In specific, you keep referencing data from several years ago.

Wall Street funds are in fact net sellers of homes right now.

So to the extent that they deserve blame for home price increases during the free money era, they deserve credit now for dropping prices in the towns where prices are down

23.09.2025 15:00 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The result is that we support existing home owners and their prices. To the detriment of those who don’t yet own.

I’m of the view that blaming Wall Street for the crisis is myopic and naive, when really we should be blaming β€œAmericans.”

23.09.2025 15:00 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

But those policies: eg zoning laws, low taxes, environmental laws, foreclosure prevention all exist for β€œgood” reasons.

We don’t want to kick grandma out of her house because of high taxes.
We don’t want to build on every square inch of land…

23.09.2025 15:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Because we’re so favorable to owners, real estate has been a great investment in that time.

Wall Street is a tiny tiny portion of the investor class. That money was what pulled us out of the GFC finally!

There are lots of policy changes we should make to fix the crisis.

23.09.2025 15:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Look, you’re not alone in seeking blame for our affordability crisis and there’s no more ready-made-villain than β€œWall Street Landlord.”

But in fact we have 60 years with every law, tax, policy in the US inflating home prices to help homeowners, to the detriment of those who do not yet own.

23.09.2025 15:00 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Furthermore, investors are an important and valuable part of the housing economy.

Most renters are not in a position to buy. They *need* rental homes to rent!

It is a misinterpretation to assume that if an investor buys a house that means a homeowner cannot.

23.09.2025 04:09 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
No, Wall Street investors are not buying up a bunch of homes The share of institutional investors buying houses is even lower in 2024 than last year, when it was nowhere near the reported 44%.

Investors is not the same a β€œWall St”

Only 4% of all investor purchases are firms with more that 1000 homes.

96% of investor purchases are people who own 1-4 homes. Otherwise known as β€œAmericans”.

www.housingwire.com/articles/no-...

23.09.2025 04:07 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

My guess is you’ll barely notice it. We’ve been anticipating the Silver Tsunami for at least a decade. Boomers are still net buyers of real estate. They don’t want to sell ever. At some point the grandkids will get a house or two.

23.09.2025 03:58 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I assume you shared that bc you think that β€œWall Street” is keeping prices artificially high?

Alas, nope. Wall Street owns a tiny fraction of the homes. Like 1%. In fact the towns like Tampa and Phoenix where those companies invested the most money are the markets where prices have dropped the most

23.09.2025 03:54 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Why Home Prices Aren’t Falling Like You Might Expect
YouTube video by Compass Why Home Prices Aren’t Falling Like You Might Expect

7/7 Some buyers are waiting for lower rates and lower prices. The data says they may get one or the other but both may be elusive.

This week's video:

youtu.be/r_kNzYC7J0Y?...

22.09.2025 23:16 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

6/7 We see it in the price reductions too.

41.5% of the homes have taken a price cut from the original list price. That level isn't increasing.

22.09.2025 23:16 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

5/7 This "downside stickiness" psychology is a key reason for price stability.
This week, the median price of new pending contracts ticked up to $397,500, coming in almost 2% above the same week last year.

22.09.2025 23:16 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

4/7 But here's the interesting part:

Even with limited supply, newly pending sales were up almost 5% from last year this week. We counted 77,000 sales contracts started this week.
More transactions are getting done in states with more available inventory.

22.09.2025 23:16 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

3/7 New listings are down and withdrawals are up.

This week we counted just over 66,000 newly listed single-family homes, 5% fewer than a year ago.

This 90-day rolling average shows the trend clearly.

22.09.2025 23:16 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

2/7 Data shows this in action:

National inventory has been unchanged at ~860,000 single-family homes since July. Last year it was rising quickly.

22.09.2025 23:16 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Why aren't home prices falling like you might expect now?

It's what Chip Case called "downside stickiness." When the market slows, sellers don't want to sell at a loss, so they withdraw listings, which keeps supply limited.

That's what we're seeing now. THREAD πŸ“½οΈπŸ§΅πŸ‘‡

22.09.2025 23:16 β€” πŸ‘ 53    πŸ” 13    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 0

hopefully we have rates near 6 in the coming months!

18.09.2025 20:22 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Everyone's talking Fed of course, but the real news of the day may be the new construction data

17.09.2025 19:01 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Title: Days on Market per State β€” U.S. Median Days for Single-Family Homes

U.S. map with states color-coded and labeled by median days on market (DOM)

Color legend / scale:
Medium blue: 42–49 days
Light blue: 56–63 days
Light red/orange: 70–77 days
Darker red/orange: 84–98 days

State values (selected):
42 days: Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin
49 days: Michigan, Massachusetts
56 days: Pennsylvania, Virginia, Minnesota, Maine
63 days: Washington, California, North Dakota
70 days: Utah, Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona, Oklahoma, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia
77 days: Oregon, Montana, Texas
84 days: Alabama
91 days: Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi
98 days: Hawaii

Source: Altos Research, Compass; median days on market for single-family homes.

Title: Days on Market per State β€” U.S. Median Days for Single-Family Homes U.S. map with states color-coded and labeled by median days on market (DOM) Color legend / scale: Medium blue: 42–49 days Light blue: 56–63 days Light red/orange: 70–77 days Darker red/orange: 84–98 days State values (selected): 42 days: Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin 49 days: Michigan, Massachusetts 56 days: Pennsylvania, Virginia, Minnesota, Maine 63 days: Washington, California, North Dakota 70 days: Utah, Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona, Oklahoma, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia 77 days: Oregon, Montana, Texas 84 days: Alabama 91 days: Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi 98 days: Hawaii Source: Altos Research, Compass; median days on market for single-family homes.

days on market context H/T @mikesimonsen.bsky.social

17.09.2025 12:41 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Three observations that continue to surprise me
A) Waymo taxis are just incredible
B) Tesla has a long way to catch up
C) maga is a deeply decel movement

10.09.2025 16:08 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@mikesimonsen is following 20 prominent accounts