Riggs

It absolutely does. The CPI is about 40% housing (rent/owner-equivalent rent).

It was a general situation though. The emergency caused a generalized supply crunch that took years to unwind. I don’t know where you got the idea that it was some kind of special emergency pricing that would go down once the emergency was gone, but … that was never the case.

The CPI does include hedonic adjustments for the quality of items.

They probably did, saw there was too much Trump in there, thought “this is too political”, and refused to pursue it.

That you use it as a contentless pejorative?

I said infinitely large, because that's the maximum possible impact it could have. Increasing it to ~600 seats does practically nothing.

Expanding the house to be infinitely large would make the EC about 10% less unfair. That’s pretty insignificant.

The NPVIC doesn’t require a constitutional amendment.

Americans have spoken and they demand wokeness

Several times? That's a lie.

The modern filibuster rule was put in place in 1975. Since then, Democrats have had a filibuster proof majority in the following periods:
1975-1979
7 months in 2009

That's it.

That poll doesn't seem very reliable. There is absolutely no way the shift among young voters was *that* inconsistent. Probably a tiny sample.

Did young voters shift somewhat towards Trump? Probably. Was there a 31-point difference between the shifts in Michigan and Georgia? Literally unbelievable.

It’s wiggling so much he can’t walk in a straight line

the key to understanding today's moment in journalism is specifically a subset of elite journos at NYT/Free Press/WaPo who basically adopt the position of the main character of NIGHTCRAWLER (2014) when it comes to their role in the news

What?

The biggest failure of the Obama era was doing austerity, making the economic recovery anemically slow.

The central policy of the Biden era was to provide a ton of financial stimulus during COVID, making the economy boom.

Biden's biggest failure was letting the fascists go free.

Well, that’s absurdly wrong.
As always, most of the US federal budget goes to social security and healthcare (Medicare/Medicaid).

Aid to Israel, at it highest, is about 0.3% of the federal budget.

Am I reading this right? Is he simultaneously the mayor of Union City and a member of the State Senate?

Ok, so technically, the record on wikipedia (shared by 4 players now) is just times on base (9), but two of the other guys, Max Carey (1922) and Stan Hack (1942), also did it in only 9 PAs.

Max Carey also stole home in that game (and got 2 other SBs)!

Very blaseball

It's tied for the record (it's already on wikipedia)

A screenshot of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Times_on_base#Single_game showing Ohtani's current performance.

Making some wikipedia edits

boooo

God, this game is incredible

Which is extremely incorrect.

When you make people hungry, they usually don’t overthrow the system; they usually just starve.

By agreeing with the implicit sentiment that welfare is bad and that we wouldn’t need it in an ideal world. Which is extremely incorrect!

That’s not the root cause though. We would still need welfare even if wages were 5x what they are now.

Most people in poverty are non-workers. You cannot help them through higher wages. You can help them via welfare.

Ok, but we definitely shouldn’t do that trade. Welfare isn’t a regrettable necessity that only exists because of low wages; it’s a necessary redistribution to non-workers at all wage levels.

Thank you for your insight!

At least using literally like that had a purpose (at its inception): sarcasm

Using POV like that has nothing to do with the term