OK team, I understand what you heard might have been “get the broadband twerk”, but what I actually told you to do was….
17.10.2025 11:18 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@andrewlxnen.bsky.social
I make electronic music as LX NEN lxnen.bandcamp.com I am Pageholder 39/400 I have an Erdös-Bacon-Sabbath number of 11 I was founder & former leader of the Pirate Party UK I finished in last place in FPL 23/24
OK team, I understand what you heard might have been “get the broadband twerk”, but what I actually told you to do was….
17.10.2025 11:18 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0And 2 sugars.
16.10.2025 14:10 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0All the world’s a stage, except when the budget would only stretch to an abandoned quarry.
16.10.2025 12:29 — 👍 11 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I feel seen.
16.10.2025 10:50 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0You just need to understand that the barista/customer relationship is analogous to the lawyer/client relationship. You pay them to distainfully explain intentionally obscure technical terms. On subsequently visits you are judged, so diligently repeat only what you were coached to say.
16.10.2025 08:04 — 👍 22 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 3The party of free market capitalism are shocking hypocritical when people freely choose the ‘wrong’ education!
08.10.2025 16:42 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Bernard is a charming chap who donated his fee for this public information film about flammable hairspray to charity.
02.10.2025 08:01 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Dancing, I assume?
02.10.2025 07:59 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Who do they turn to for grammar checking?
16.09.2025 07:50 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I prefer a smart 3 piece tiramisuit.
13.09.2025 08:08 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Today’s the day! I’m playing a gig at 2:15 at the Firefly, as part of the Worcester Music Festival. Expect 303s, 909s and a cover of a classic acid track: www.worcestermusicfestival.co.uk/bands/lx-nen/
13.09.2025 08:05 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Or you could do your job properly?
27.08.2025 08:07 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Why does the AI industry put such absurd value on PhD level intelligence? We have a bunch of those sitting around in our University cafe.
24.08.2025 14:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Sorry, you probably make a good point, but I'm too busy laughing at the bit where he wrote 'my column' then drew a tiny penis.
17.08.2025 11:32 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0minimalism is a scam invented by big small to sell more less
11.11.2023 20:23 — 👍 4823 🔁 1579 💬 52 📌 29The Condiment Girls
13.08.2025 20:57 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Magritte's painting "the treachery of images" (a painting of a pipe with the words "ceci n'est pas une pipe" underneath ('this is not a pipe'), but the painted pipe is replaced by the Tubular Bells logo from the Mike Oldfield album of the same name.
13.08.2025 20:46 — 👍 20 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0Frankie goes to Pasadena
My Chemical it’s Complicated
The Condiment Girls
The idea that websites all over the world would be expected to comply with this sort of thing from all 200-ish different jurisdictions worldwide is frankly ludicrous.
12.08.2025 18:30 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0‘North Atlantic’ is such a clumsy name, we should definitely rename it bread roll.
12.08.2025 09:04 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Not sure how you work that out
11.08.2025 17:51 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0But you lose all your UK traffic, which for local businesses could easily be 100%
11.08.2025 17:25 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Not a great plan for sites based in the UK!
11.08.2025 16:51 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It’s not just the startups that write ludicrous NDAs. I am still officially unable to disclose who the developer of M*cr*s*ft P*w*rP**nt is or what it will be called.
11.08.2025 11:21 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Categorising isn’t their strong point. As I understand it, the Marquis De Sade’s “120 days of Sodom” isn’t defined as harmful (text only exemption applies) but the Barbie move is (it’s a 12A cert, therefore reasonable to expect it’s harmful to under 12s so 17 year olds must be protected from it).
11.08.2025 10:50 — 👍 26 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0So sites have to either put in age checks even though they believe they are compliant or wait until after Ofcom decides that they have to pay a fine of up to £18m before they can defend themselves, plus there's a legal duty not to overreact and put the age checks in where not needed?
11.08.2025 10:35 — 👍 15 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Thank you, that was delightfully irksome.
11.08.2025 09:34 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I find it helps to think about reply threads as documents to be read by your followers rather than a series of 1-to-1 chats with individuals.
From that angle, your followers awarding zero likes is sufficient feedback to the author. It's also fine if a few followers find value/humour when you don't.
True, but would those parents care about their children using a VPN, fake ID or simply going to non-compliant web sites like Google?
11.08.2025 07:42 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0The money spent on the Online Safety Act would certainly have been better spent on educating parents, especially as the bill was always doomed to failure even if @Ofcom hadn't completely botched the implementation.
10.08.2025 22:01 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0