SteveEarleSweatshirt

This is not how college level assignments work. Just because it says "personal opinion" does not mean you write a 4th grade journal entry. You always have to cite real sources and use actual arguments instead of tautologies.

10 points to react and discuss the content of the article and how it relates to the class they are taking, which the student does not do at all, not mentioning one developmental psychological term. 5 points for "clarity of writing" and we can all see this rant is not at a college level of writing.

Did you read the criteria? 10 points for a "clear tie to article" which the paper does not cite, say the author's name, or really engages with what the article is about. (Could you give me a summary of what that unnamed article is about from this paper?).

What are you even saying? You sound like a deranged old hag

You seem like your brain is so old it doesn't work anymore. Fuckin nasty terf scum

Oldass person who double spaces after periods like they are writing on a typewriter claims they're able to think for themselves and adapt lol

An actual monarchy funds the website you write for

Yeah! Fuck this... uh retired liberal nurse?

The profile of one of the accounts this user is wanting to slap. The avatar is a picture of 2 dogs in a doorway with the username "aging69ca" "I'm happily married with two adult children who still live at home. Retired registered nurse. I enjoy reading, nonograms, cross stitch"

You really don't need to fantasize about hitting a retired nurse who loves sewing and liberalism because she is confused by a bad faith right winger

Screenshot of the Vanity Fair promotional article for Olivia Nuzzi's book with the image of Nuzzi replaced with an image of the engineer from Prometheus, due to their similarity in look: "Vanity Fair's West Coast Editor Olivia Nuzzi was a star political correspondent until scandal led her into exile - and to a California up in flames. In an excerpt from her book, 'American Canto,' she takes stock of scorched earth."

Man this shit sucks

I think a fascist regime promoting the 80+ extrajudicial murders they have actually done is more serious than saying a supporter of pedophilia should be killed. I actually don't think the second one is wrong because I don't have the stunted morality of a tech bro

An edit of the Rob Whisman "Uber driver sucked me off??" Image with bill Clinton instead, and the words "Donald Trump sucked me off??"

That's who she is defending. Anger also gets directed towards the defenders of evil people.

The actual dynamic is the NYT publishes stories based on how they affect the interests of its owners and their wealthy friends, to the point they bury damning information about the president to help cover PR when their journalist solicited bribes from a child trafficker.

Something is deeply wrong with you to plug your billionaire boss's vanity project while defending other elites from complicity in child trafficking

Not directing this at the OP, they didn't write it I don't think

This revisionist history is pretty ridiculous. You don't need to both-sides Republican officials clearly engaging in a cover up. You could say media are complicit but the liberal voter has been incensed by this for years whereas conservative voters are pivoting to "actually it's ephebophilia"

and he also went insane on me during the solar eclipse last year telling me not to look at the eclipse cause it's actually a demon that the Mayans summoned thousands of years ago

The upside to me of the government banning hemp derived products is that I have beef with my local head shop owner cause he promoted voting for Trump to me last year. Feeling vindicated that this moron voted for a pedophile that will put him out of business.

The strategy of waffling on issues like this has been utilized by Democrats for decades. Joe walsh has had the Democratic party that he is currently advocating for since he was a Republican toady. But it's our fault that he and every empty headed old guy like him believes in a fabricated reality.

I'll give him this: a marine taking his shirt off, making everyone uncomfortable, then whining that everyone hates him is generally what happens when you spend time with a marine

Slicing it off with a boxcutter would relieve some of the shame, to me

I feel like people don't remember the same thing happened on old Twitter. There were just way more posts to obscure the annoying ones, and a lot of the time off-topic scold posts on something like a sports tweet were often hidden by moderation

If what the devs of this site say is true about their project being an open source architecture for communities to build themselves, the main thing that doesn't make sense to me is:
why is it a desirable outcome to have separate social media platforms that are segregated by minority status?

How is this not at odds with what your organization has claimed its end product goals are? Is the thing your service claims to offer not a current reality? bsky.app/profile/hail...

Feel like this explains the medbed ai video. His sycophants make that video for him, he says "post it everyone needs to see this", they realize how bad it looks and delete it

It would be cool if right wingers had like an ounce of honor and could act like humans

This has to be the dorkiest thing I've ever read. You sound like such a pussy saying this shit. The worst part is it's all virtue signalling

No I wouldn't, it's just a stupid fucking question that sounds like a 13 year old with ODD said it. Or I guess a 25 year old incel with adult ODD

I tell you what I wouldn't do with it, be a virtue signalling incel who is a cuck to a billionaire pedophile lol. What a sad fucking existence